Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

If the Dems want to win the WH in 2020, they need to stop doing dumb shit like this.

Every time they try some underhanded tricks and lose ground, all they doing is giving Trump leverage over them.

How is that such a hard concept to understand?

Originally posted by SquallX
If the Dems want to win the WH in 2020, they need to stop doing dumb shit like this.

Every time they try some underhanded tricks and lose ground, all they doing is giving Trump leverage over them.

How is that such a hard concept to understand?

He has so much ammunition now that his campaign speeches have practically written themselves.


That's stupid. The Dems are ruining the country.

Nah. Dems being Dumb will probably help them...cause lotta Dumb People gonna Vote Dem anyway.

Originally posted by dadudemon
He has so much ammunition now that his campaign speeches have practically written themselves.


That's stupid. The Dems are ruining the country.

The worst part is that his speeches will lack substance and fall back to how yuge his wins are and why we need him <insert bad-mouthing statement here.>

Originally posted by dadudemon
He has so much ammunition now that his campaign speeches have practically written themselves.


That's stupid. The Dems are ruining the country.

If Trump wins in 2020 do you think the dems will have played an even larger role in his victory than they did in 2016?

Originally posted by Surtur
If Trump wins in 2020 do you think the dems will have played an even larger role in his victory than they did in 2016?

Yes. At this stage in the game, Trump can only lose if he so chooses if the Dems stays the course.

Originally posted by SquallX
Yes. At this stage in the game, Trump can only lose if he so chooses if the Dems stays the course.

The funny thing is that all they needed to do to win was act sane.

Rob is mysteriously absent during all this winning

I don't think any of them are to "weak." The system we have in place for political discussion is a sham, it favors sound bites and wicked good comebacks rather than substance. Headlines lament individual attacks rather than sound policy and solution-based discussion, in that regard the potential candidates will have a hard time with Trump. Not because they are "weak" but because the circus of politics demands their eneterainers and sacrifices at the expense of honesty and good faith for voters.

Originally posted by Surtur
If Trump wins in 2020 do you think the dems will have played an even larger role in his victory than they did in 2016?

Yes. It is like they setup up his wins, over and over, just so he could have talking points.



Also, I agree with Squall's assessment of the candidates. I like Yang the most and we agree a lot. But he's too damn weak.

Originally posted by snowdragon
I don't think any of them are to "weak." The system we have in place for political discussion is a sham, it favors sound bites and wicked good comebacks rather than substance. Headlines lament individual attacks rather than sound policy and solution-based discussion, in that regard the potential candidates will have a hard time with Trump. Not because they are "weak" but because the circus of politics demands their eneterainers and sacrifices at the expense of honesty and good faith for voters.

Agreed, it's made the Broly's of the world.

Originally posted by cuck
Agreed, it's made the Broly's of the world.

Says the guy who only can post one line zingers and not actually debate a single issue about anything, ever. You have never debated anything since being on this forum.

How in the world can anyone debate against an airtight argument like "Duuuuur, Damokratz baaaaad, huuuur."


Just too good for me, QuanBlowupDoll.