Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Awful.

My life has consistently gotten better since removing myself from this forum to an almost 99.9%. I will continue to do so.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
My life has consistently gotten better since removing myself from this forum to an almost 99.9%. I will continue to do so. Broly you are a top bloke, we may not see eye to eye on politics but beyond that. I like you can't be assed with the squabbling these days.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
My life has consistently gotten better since removing myself from this forum to an almost 99.9%. I will continue to do so.

*shrugs* No need to let this place impact you this much.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Broly you are a top bloke, we may not see eye to eye on politics but beyond that. I like you can't be assed with the squabbling these days.

Lol the goal of the topic was to get people to squabble.

The poll is just obvious fun; it's not to be taken seriously.

The story is the story, either source.

Neat, but the passive aggressive poll kinda nukes any chance at meaningful discussion.

And this also could have been posted in the trump thread.

Originally posted by Surtur
Neat, but the passive aggressive poll kinda nukes any chance at meaningful discussion.

And this also could have been posted in the trump thread.

It's only passive aggressive if you're a sensitive type. Normal people will see it for the humor it is.

Yeah, that part's possibly true.

Nah, it's passive aggressive. But feign ignorance, it's not worth debating

Option 4 is the greatest thing ever created.

Originally posted by Robtard


Yeah, that part's possibly true.

no, this is a poll

Report: Air Force calls diversion of funds for border wall a national security risk

The U.S. Air Force, in a report revealed Friday, said the planned $3.6 billion diversion of military funds for a border wall is a risk of national security.

The report, obtained by NBC News, outlines 51 military projects scheduled to lose funding, and their importance to national security. -snip

Pretty sure I remember you saying you'd cut military spending too.

As did almost everyone on the boards.

I'm sure we could all find better things to spend it on though.

Not gonna lose any sleep over the military losing some funding. And hey if the dems had given trump the money he wanted this wouldn't be necessary. Oh well.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Pretty sure I remember you saying you'd cut military spending too.

As did almost everyone on the boards.

I'm sure we could all find better things to spend it on though.

I would, but not at the expense of schools, hazardous waste treatment and day care.

Originally posted by Surtur
Not gonna lose any sleep over the military losing some funding. And hey if the dems had given trump the money he wanted this wouldn't be necessary. Oh well.
^

-Blames Democrats (as usual)

-Ignores that Trump had a Republican controlled government for two years and Republicans said a big "No" to his wall too

Doesn't the USA spend more money on their military than the next like dozen countries combined?

I'm sure they will be fine, lol.

Originally posted by Robtard
^

-Blames Democrats (as usual)

-Ignores that Trump had a Republican controlled government for two years and Republicans said a big "No" to his wall too

^Same side that blames republicans for everything. I laughed out loud.

Originally posted by Trocity
Doesn't the USA spend more money on their military than the next like dozen countries combined?

I'm sure they will be fine, lol.

This is not a cut to military spending, it is a cut to military service projects, e.g. building a levy to protect homes in a flood zone.

It is not the military that is going to suffer, it is the citizens in these states who will not have their necessary projects completed.

The Democrats could always propose a bill that could replace the funding, if they actually cared about the citizens affected.

I guess we'll see if they really care.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
This is not a cut to military spending, it is a cut to military service projects, e.g. building a levy to protect homes in a flood zone.

It is not the military that is going to suffer, it is the citizens in these states who will not have their necessary projects completed.

Bingo.

That was mentioned multiple times and conveniently ignored by Trump's apologist.

Originally posted by dadudemon
I'm not upset that he's pulling funding from those projects.

Not at all.

Good!


I'm upset that he put the money elsewhere instead of trying to do better budgeting.


He needs to cut about $250 billion more from annual military spending.

Yeah I'm confused, you'd think dems would be okay with pulling funding from the military. Isn't it usually that side that whines about military overspending? Isn't it usually the Republicans pushing for more and more and more military spending?

I want the left to be honest: even if Mexico legitimately offered to pay for the wall they'd still be against it(this is why I laugh whenever they go "herp derp I thought Mexico wuz payin!", as if they'd be okay with that). This is not about money or even feasibility. It never has been. Nancy Pelosi gave the game away by calling the wall immoral(it's not).

Originally posted by Surtur
Yeah I'm confused, you'd think dems would be okay with pulling funding from the military. Isn't it usually that side that whines about military overspending? Isn't it usually the Republicans pushing for more and more and more military spending?


This will fix your confusion:

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
This is not a cut to military spending, it is a cut to military service projects, e.g. building a levy to protect homes in a flood zone.

It is not the military that is going to suffer, it is the citizens in these states who will not have their necessary projects completed.

You can also read the opening post link and a few posts after for the same info on the first page.

Yeah I see some nice spin there. So sorry about those flood zones.