Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

So now all the people who said this would never happen twice, and the second time in an absolute blowout.

Will it be Russia to Blame?

Probably didn't help Labour any that the UK has been swept up in nationalism due to Brexit.

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
So now all the people who said this would never happen twice, and the second time in an absolute blowout.

Will it be Russia to Blame?

I think the British, like the US, is experiencing the Bradley Effect.

Hardly anyone wants an invasion of a bunch of poor, crime-ridden, immigrants/refugees.

Very few people like to be publicly shamed into giving up their homes, money, and resources.

And, still, not very many people want to pay more in taxes.




Seflishness is really what all of this is about. And I'm okay with selfishness up to a certain point. As more and more of the young people grow up the be conservative, we will see this trend continue.

Thanks, Gen Z! The overly politically correct Gen X and Millennials need to drink a nice large warm cup of STFU. I will try my best to hire as many hard-working, un-virtue signaling, Gen Z folks.

How did Jeremy Corbyn lose? He announced his pronouns and everything.

Where is wobbie? I want to gloat.

https://i.imgur.com/DhysVKb.png

kek my constituency went conservative for the first time ever!
What mad lads!

So sounds like this was basically a second vote on Brexit for most people and the pro brexit crowd won. Now the conservatives will have no excuse not to execute on Brexit and reap the rewards or take responsiblity for whatever happens as a result.

Originally posted by dadudemon
I think the British, like the US, is experiencing the Bradley Effect.

Hardly anyone wants an invasion of a bunch of poor, crime-ridden, immigrants/refugees.

Very few people like to be publicly shamed into giving up their homes, money, and resources.

And, still, not very many people want to pay more in taxes.




Seflishness is really what all of this is about. And I'm okay with selfishness up to a certain point. As more and more of the young people grow up the be conservative, we will see this trend continue.

Thanks, Gen Z! The overly politically correct Gen X and Millennials need to drink a nice large warm cup of STFU. I will try my best to hire as many hard-working, un-virtue signaling, Gen Z folks.



That sounds like sour grapes to me. Waah, waah, waah, more people are growing up to be conservative, wah, wah, wah!! Cry me a river, socialist.

Nah, people who are totally ok with government taking most of someone's income and then redistributing around to people it doesn't rightly belong to are the really selfish ones. People who think they are entitled to have all of their student loan paid off by taxpayers are the truly selfish ones. Conservatives aren't the selfish ones. The crybaby socialists who think they are entitled to everything are.


And nope, as someone who is proudly part of gen X, I'm not gonna be shutting up anytime soon about conservatives winning, dude, so get f***ing used to it, sore loser. Save your crybaby tears though... you're gonna be needing them even more in November of next year.

Originally posted by Blakemore
Where is wobbie? I want to gloat.


Notice how his wittle butt buddy pooty is also nowhere to be seen lmao.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
That sounds like sour grapes to me. Waah, waah, waah, more people are growing up to be conservative, wah, wah, wah!! Cry me a river, socialist.

Nah, people who are totally ok with government taking most of someone's income and then redistributing around to people it doesn't rightly belong to are the really selfish ones. People who think they are entitled to have all of their student loan paid off by taxpayers are the truly selfish ones. Conservatives aren't the selfish ones. The crybaby socialists who think they are entitled to everything are.


And nope, as someone who is proudly part of gen X, I'm not gonna be shutting up anytime soon about conservatives winning, dude, so get f***ing used to it, sore loser. Save your crybaby tears though... you're gonna be needing them even more in November of next year. This stupid retard can't even read lmao

Make me your king and I will extend the borders of your nation until they meet, then we will conquer the stars.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
That sounds like sour grapes to me. Waah, waah, waah, more people are growing up to be conservative, wah, wah, wah!! Cry me a river, socialist.

Nah, people who are totally ok with government taking most of someone's income and then redistributing around to people it doesn't rightly belong to are the really selfish ones. People who think they are entitled to have all of their student loan paid off by taxpayers are the truly selfish ones. Conservatives aren't the selfish ones. The crybaby socialists who think they are entitled to everything are.


And nope, as someone who is proudly part of gen X, I'm not gonna be shutting up anytime soon about conservatives winning, dude, so get f***ing used to it, sore loser. Save your crybaby tears though... you're gonna be needing them even more in November of next year.

Never in the history of KMC has someone ever been so stupid as to argue against a post they agree with.

It's actually pretty sad.

He's anidiot dadudemon.

Originally posted by Blakemore
He's anidiot dadudemon.



Look who's talking.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Never in the history of KMC has someone ever been so stupid as to argue against a post they agree with.

It's actually pretty sad. lmao

Corbyn is delusional.

Yeah, "we lost, but we won".

Who does that remind you of? It certainly does sound familiar...it's as if we are seeing a phenomenon similar to what began a few years ago, right around late 2016/early 2017. Maybe not on as large a scale, but oh it's there.

And the guardian is also calling for the UK to have their own Mueller Report about Russia now.

F*cking giggle.

LOL@ leftists and their constant pretend winning when they are clearly constantly losing.

Whats your name?

Assuming you're talking to me since you replied right after me, I'm not about to tell you my real name lol.

TheLoneRanger

WTF

Little PutinBot is still nowhere to be seen lmao. I wonder why... hmmm...

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Little PutinBot is still nowhere to be seen lmao. I wonder why... hmmm...

Working on his Ph.D., is busy with work, and busy with holidays.




I got really great grades in school and college. Because I paid attention and retained detailed information that was helpful for homework and tests.

Now I must go: my arms are getting cramps again from patting myself on the back so much.

PB has finally gotten up the nerve to show himself over two weeks after his side got their butts kicked in the UK election. Notice he didn't post in this thread though. What's the matter, pooty? Cat got your tongue? Or maybe it's those pesky russians again, eh?

Originally posted by Surtur
Yeah, "we lost, but we won".

Who does that remind you of? It certainly does sound familiar...it's as if we are seeing a phenomenon similar to what began a few years ago, right around late 2016/early 2017. Maybe not on as large a scale, but oh it's there.

And the guardian is also calling for the UK to have their own Mueller Report about Russia now.

F*cking giggle.

There already is a parliamentary report into russian donations to UK political parties. It was withheld by the government until after the election.

It likely will never be published now that the Tory Party gained a majority.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
There already is a parliamentary report into russian donations to UK political parties. It was withheld by the government until after the election.

It likely will never be published now that the Tory Party gained a majority.

That's just too funny.

LOL. As expected, people *coughjadencough* are already starting the expected sore loser "it was Russia" crazy conspiracy theories lmao. Poor, poor leftists... smh.

Whatever soothes your buthurt, jaden. Now go ahead and post your obviously biased left-leaning source that "proves" it was Russia lmao.

At this point I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and assume he was merely pointing out the existence of the russian report and not actually succumbing to russian hysteria.

Originally posted by Surtur
At this point I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and assume he was merely pointing out the existence of the russian report and not actually succumbing to russian hysteria.


I actually question the validity of the so-called "report" itself and it doesn't surprise jaden is so quick to takes it as gospel because he so desperately WANTS to believe it. There are people in power who just don't want to admit that their leftist globalist ideology sucks and that the masses are actually rejecting it. It has nothing to do with Russia and they damn well know it. This "report" is just the latest tool they are using to try and fool everyone into thinking that their losses aren't actually legitimate losses. In other words, they're butthurt sore losers... but we all already knew that lol.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
PB has finally gotten up the nerve to show himself over two weeks after his side got their butts kicked in the UK election. Notice he didn't post in this thread though. What's the matter, pooty? Cat got your tongue? Or maybe it's those pesky russians again, eh?

Poor Pooty!

Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Poor Pooty!


Yup lol.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
LOL. As expected, people *coughjadencough* are already starting the expected sore loser "it was Russia" crazy conspiracy theories lmao. Poor, poor leftists... smh.

Whatever soothes your buthurt, jaden. Now go ahead and post your obviously biased left-leaning source that "proves" it was Russia lmao.

Odd comment given the party I voted for got 48 out of 56 (86%)seats (an increase of 13) with the highest % vote share of any party.

But here's a "left-leaning" source...Sky News (owned by Rupert Murdoch who owns Fox News and is the UK equivalent of it.

https://news.sky.com/story/government-wont-release-report-on-russian-interference-and-could-face-legal-action-11865089

Or the wholeheartedly Conservative Party supporting Telegraph owned by Tory Party donors the Barclay Brothers

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/2019/11/06/government-must-publish-report-russias-involvement-british-politics/

Or the massively pro Conservative Party Daily Mail

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7668803/Boris-Johnson-compromised-Russian-businessman.html

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
I actually question the validity of the so-called "report" itself and it doesn't surprise jaden is so quick to takes it as gospel because he so desperately WANTS to believe it. There are people in power who just don't want to admit that their leftist globalist ideology sucks and that the masses are actually rejecting it. It has nothing to do with Russia and they damn well know it. This "report" is just the latest tool they are using to try and fool everyone into thinking that their losses aren't actually legitimate losses. In other words, they're butthurt sore losers... but we all already knew that lol.

The "so-called" report is written by the Tory Government.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Odd comment given the party I voted for got 48 out of 56 (86%)seats (an increase of 13) with the highest % vote share of any party.

But here's a "left-leaning" source...Sky News (owned by Rupert Murdoch who owns Fox News and is the UK equivalent of it.

https://news.sky.com/story/government-wont-release-report-on-russian-interference-and-could-face-legal-action-11865089

Or the wholeheartedly Conservative Party supporting Telegraph owned by Tory Party donors the Barclay Brothers

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/2019/11/06/government-must-publish-report-russias-involvement-british-politics/

Or the massively pro Conservative Party Daily Mail

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7668803/Boris-Johnson-compromised-Russian-businessman.html

If they end up releasing the report, would you think that holding onto it until after the election was the right thing to do or would you think they still should have released it prior to the election?

An Intelligence Report Will Say UK Spy Agencies Found No Evidence Of Russian State Interference In The Outcome Of The Brexit Referendum

This is from November and it is also from Buzzfeed so not necessarily a reputable place. Their anonymous sources have been wrong before when it comes to stories about Russia.

It wouldn't shock me if the report said that Russia engaged in shenanigans similar to what they did to the USA in 2016: trolling on social media, etc. Nothing major and nothing that had any real impact

Originally posted by Surtur
If they end up releasing the report, would you think that holding onto it until after the election was the right thing to do or would you think they still should have released it prior to the election?

Well if a report into it cleared the government of any conflict of interest you would think they would be happy to publish it.

Here's a few bits from Conservative Party supporting outlets like The Times, The Financial Times and the Daily mail

.

They should definitely release the report now. Did they even give a reason why they waited?

Originally posted by Surtur
They should definitely release the report now. Did they even give a reason why they waited?

I agree. And no. The chairman of the committee that published it (a former Tory Party minister, Dominic Grieve said no reason was given for the delay.

Interesting fact about this "blow out" is more people voted for anti Brexit Parties than pro... First past the post is such a silly system.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Interesting fact about this "blow out" is more people voted for anti Brexit Parties than pro... First past the post is such a silly system.

I don't know about that.

I found this from the Telegraph and I assume it makes you wrong:



https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/13/world/europe/uk-election-brexit.html



That seems heavily pro-Brexit, to me.

But what about the "lawyer" way of claiming all other parties are pro-Brexit and, so, add up to a larger percent of the popular vote (but lost)?

That doesn't work, either:

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-48027580


The plurality of votes went to pro-Brexiteers. A smaller vote went to the minority Remainers.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/election-result-boris-johnson-pro-brexit-referendum-voters-conservatives-a9245866.html?amp#aoh=15776014846169&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s

Pro referendum parties got 52% of the vote mate. It's why first past the post is as shot as your electoral college system.

52% will always be more than half.

Still crying over the UK election results, pooty?


"Russia! Russia! Russia! It was the russians!!!"

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Interesting fact about this "blow out" is more people voted for anti Brexit Parties than pro... First past the post is such a silly system.

Cmon pooty, it was a blowout.

Poor pooty. Pretending like the election was some kind of victory for his side.


Leftists and their pretend winning lol.

52 will always be greater than 48

Originally posted by Putinbot1
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/election-result-boris-johnson-pro-brexit-referendum-voters-conservatives-a9245866.html?amp#aoh=15776014846169&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s

Pro referendum parties got 52% of the vote mate. It's why first past the post is as shot as your electoral college system.

52% will always be more than half.

I don't see how those numbers add up to your claim. By the numbers, and by election results, it's impossible.

Let me be clear that your claim is not the same claim in the article you posted.

From the pollster (a very good one, by the way: he makes predictions that are often criticized but shockingly correct):





Remember, your claim is this:



The actual election results do not reflect this claim.

The exit poll you reference is not a "pro-Brexit, anti-Brexit" binary. They asked a different question. Do you have he poll results in its raw form? We could see the actual questions asked. I don't trust a news article summary - I prefer to see the actual questions asked. Who knows? Perhaps the questions actually do reflect your point and the Independent misrepresented the poll?



Also, election results show that your point is directly wrong simply because the numbers do not add up (I cited my sources). The actual numbers from the polls do not add up to the claim you're making. The votes cast and tallied do not equal your point. That's because the poll you're referencing is not the point you're making. Which reconciles the facts and confusion.

52% voted for second referendum parties. Fact!

Originally posted by Putinbot1
52 will always be greater than 48

^ He's right, you know.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Well if a report into it cleared the government of any conflict of interest you would think they would be happy to publish it.

Here's a few bits from Conservative Party supporting outlets like The Times, The Financial Times and the Daily mail

They'll be no shortage of useful idiots defending Russia.

That seems like a good thing it balances out the idiots blaming Russia for everything bad.

If you say so, comrade.

I see. So defending Russia=bad

Being so delusional you blame them for brexit=good

You've been blanket defending Russia since Trump told you in 2017, you decide if that'd good or bad or whatever.

Odd, I don't recall ever blaming Russia for Brexit. Surely you have a post?

Though I do know that a fractured and weaker EU is beneficial to Putin/Russia. So the idea that they helped push for an exit with large donations and misinformation campaigns isn't tinfoil hat level, which is what I've seen some people mention.

I know bro left leaning conspiracy theories are never "tinfoil hat" level stuff to you guys.

Originally posted by Surtur
I know bro left leaning conspiracy theories are never "tinfoil hat" level stuff to you guys. Because buying political influence with money and spreading misinformation to achieve a goal are unheard of or something. Okay then, Ronnie.

However you wanna spin your conspiracy theories. It's always different when u guys do it

You're using equalization tactics again, as standard. Because thinking a government threw money to achieve a goal in a foreign country is as "crazy" as believing in pedophile rings in the non-existent basement of a pizza parlor or that the previous President was born in Kenya and was secretly trying to replace the US Constitution with Sharia Law. Surt, please never change.

You're using that bullshit defense again, as standard.

My advice: drop the russian bullshit. No, russia isn't the cause of brexit or trump. It's an easy scapegoat for unintelligent individuals to use if they're too stupid or stubborn to admit their party f*cked up.

Not everything being equal levels isn't bullshit, it's a fact.

Now you're strawmanning me again, as I didn't blame either on Russia. Acknowledging foul play isn't giving absolute blame. In fact, I blamed the voters/supporters. People who voted for Trump and support Trump are responsible for Trump winning. Same goes for Brexit, if you voted for/supported Brexit, it's on you.

Hell I mean you could even argue Russia put out pro brext propaganda, but that similar to the 2016 election in America it had no real impact on the election.

But you aren't even gonna try to make that distinction, amirite?

And it's true Rob you technically didn't flat out blame Russia. You spouted some utterly dumb bullshit though that implied it wouldn't be crazy to blame them. If I'm wrong and you are willing to type out "it would be crazy to blame them" I will of course apologize.

See my post above, Ronnie. I covered your questions proactively, because I know your antics all to well.

Oh so you're merely acknowledging foul play existed(as our country commits foul play all the time too as does the UK so nothing anyone has the right to whine over) you are not saying it's reasonable to blame Russia at all?

Confirm for me I'm interpreting you correctly, thanks in advance!

Russia interfered in 2016, yes. Repeat: I blame Trump voters/supporters for Trump winning, that's how you win, with votes and support.

You're also playing games as we've had this convo many a time, and when I've said "Trump voters are responsible for Trump winning" in the past, you'd screech and say some kind of "BOTH SIDEZ ARE TO BLAME!".

Originally posted by Robtard
Russia interfered in 2016, yes. Repeat: I blame Trump voters/supporters for Trump winning, that's how you win, with votes and support.

You're also playing games as we've had this convo many a time, as when I've said "Trump voters are responsible for Trump winning", you'd screech and say some kind of "BOTH SIDEZ ARE TO BLAME!".

Oh yes both political parties played a role in electing trump that's clear to anyone with a brain.

But I'm glad you aren't arguing Russia had an actual impact on brexit, you're learning

See? You've just acknowledged your shit games as you do recall. You also still can't take responsibility for your own vote and it's still hilarious to me.

I don't personally know what impact Russian meddling had in the initial Brexit vote, we've also had this convo as well, were I noted that the Brexit vote came down to a few points (51.%9 to 48.1%?), it wouldn't have taken much foreign money and misinformation campaigns to sway it. Maybe zero, maybe some but not enough, or maybe just the 2% to flip it. I don't know though.

Edit: How are you so sure it had no impact?

Lol so in other words it's valid to blame Russia for brexit, but not to say democrats played a role in electing Trump.

I love it.

To your edit: How are u so sure Dems played no role in electing Trump?

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol so in other words it's valid to blame Russia for brexit, but not to say democrats played a role in electing Trump.

I love it. I just showed you the Brexit numbers again, it's only 2%. Again, I don't personally know, I doubt I ever will. But it's not an insane pizzagate level idea.

How are you so absolutely sure that there was no impact?

How are you sure Dems had no impact on Trump winning?

Originally posted by Surtur
To your edit: How are u so sure Dems played no role in electing Trump? Originally posted by Surtur
How are you sure Dems had no impact on Trump winning?

1) It's rude to dodge a question and then ask one yourself. Answer and ask. You've dodged twice now.

2) I made no such claim. My claim was that Trump's 2016 victory is at the hands of his voters/supporters. You people are responsible for Trump.

Oh please u little weasel. U mock the claims Dems played any role. And I'd sit out any discussion in the future you of all people wanna bring up about dodging.

If Dems played a role in Trump's it's in their hands too. Period.

So another dodge concerning your Russia/Brexit claim, even after I answered your questions. Figures. Poor form, Ronnie.

It's very telling that instead of embracing that people like you are the reason Trump is President, as you voted/support him, you make it as a negative and try to equalize the blame.

If Dems played a role Trump's victory was in their hands too. You won't weasel out of that

Originally posted by Surtur
If Dems played a role Trump's victory was in their hands too. You won't weasel out of that

HYG again:

Originally posted by Robtard

It's very telling that instead of embracing that people like you are the reason Trump is President, as you voted/support him, you make it as a negative and try to equalize the blame.

Kiddo did dems have a hand in Trump's victory yes or no?

Cuz I mean how isn't it very telling that you can't admit lefties had a hand in Trump's winning.

HYG again:

Originally posted by Robtard
1) It's rude to dodge a question and then ask one yourself. Answer and ask. You've dodged twice now.

2) I made no such claim. My claim was that Trump's 2016 victory is at the hands of his voters/supporters. You people are responsible for Trump.

HYG again:

Originally posted by Robtard

It's very telling that instead of embracing that people like you are the reason Trump is President, as you voted/support him, you make it as a negative and try to equalize the blame.



You're trying to pass the "blame" on Trump winning, which should tell you something as you're a Trump voter/supporter. Someone who is happy with his vote/support of Trump and with Trump as POTUS would be embracing that they're responsible and swimming in the taking-credit pool. Do some soul searching here.

ps Have a happy new year, Surt.

No son that isn't what is happening. I'm correctly pointing out both sides had a hand in it. Moving on.

Awww, poor little robbie is still blaming Russia for Hillary losing. Poor wittle butthurt crybaby.

Illegal aliens illegally voting had a much bigger impact than anything russia did but of course robbie will never admit that because it doesn't soothe his poor little butthurt.


Illegal aliens interfered in our 2016 election yet Trump still won despite that lol.

52% is always greater than 48% and 52% voted for pro referendum 2 parties fact!

Originally posted by Putinbot1
52% is always greater than 48% and 52% voted for pro referendum 2 parties fact!

Relevance?

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Relevance? 52% voted for pro referendum two parties.

Double post

52% voted for 2nd referendum parties over 48% . Fact!

Originally posted by Putinbot1
52% voted for 2nd referendum parties over 48% . Fact!

Hate to rub salt in your wounds, buddy. But a good 30% of Labour voters voted to Brexit.

To anyone who can answer: what was the share of votes Labour got in the election?

52% voted for 2nd referendum parties.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
52% voted for 2nd referendum parties.

Yup. But Brexit support was strong in referendum party voters.

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Hate to rub salt in your wounds, buddy. But a good 30% of Labour voters voted to Brexit.

To anyone who can answer: what was the share of votes Labour got in the election?

32%.

https://media.giphy.com/media/pUeXcg80cO8I8/giphy.gif

Kek. Now a jew is running against Corbyn. You can't make this up!

52% voted for 2nd Referendum parties...

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Yup. But Brexit support was strong in referendum party voters.

52 will always be greater than 48

Originally posted by Putinbot1
52 will always be greater than 48

As long as you don't need to add up the numbers of a bunch of different groups in order to get to that 52.

Cuz if that was the case? Boy oh boy would it look sad, deranged, and desperate to keep harping on this 52 shit.

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Yup. But Brexit support was strong in referendum party voters.

Originally posted by Surtur
As long as you don't need to add up the numbers of a bunch of different groups in order to get to that 52.

Cuz if that was the case? Boy oh boy would it look sad, deranged, and desperate to keep harping on this 52 shit.

You also have to do it to get the 48%

You people don't make sense.

52 will always be greater than 48. Fact!

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Yup. But Brexit support was strong in referendum party voters.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
52 will always be greater than 48. Fact!

Your side lost. Badly. Take the L.

Also, learn from the experience. It's not that being a conservative has suddenly become more appealing for people, it's that the other side has gotten quite deranged and shifted way too far to the left. Leaving the non-crazies almost conservative by default.

Keep that in mind, your side doesn't really truly have to change that many hearts and minds...just don't act insane.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
52 will always be greater than 48. Fact!


You're a butthurt sore loser. FACT!

When Boris Johnson triggers the brexit he can just repeat "52 is greater than 48" to soothe himself.

Originally posted by Surtur
Your side lost. Badly. Take the L.

Also, learn from the experience. It's not that being a conservative has suddenly become more appealing for people, it's that the other side has gotten quite deranged and shifted way too far to the left. Leaving the non-crazies almost conservative by default.

Keep that in mind, your side doesn't really truly have to change that many hearts and minds...just don't act insane.

That seems like sense on the surface. But how many centrists do you know nowadays?

Exactly, if the "the Left has gone too far to the Left!" is legit and not just a regurgitated talking point started at the top and filtered down through the media heads, then the youtubers and finally forum warriors, then the Right has certainly shifted too far to the Right.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
That seems like sense on the surface. But how many centrists do you know nowadays?

Not many, but you can be on the left without going so damn far to the left you screw your own side over.

52 is greater than 48... I dont know why people struggle with numbers.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
52 is greater than 48... I dont know why people struggle with numbers.

So Boris Johnson isn't your prime minister? Neat. Name who is.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
52 is greater than 48... I dont know why people struggle with numbers.


Waah, waah, waah!! Keep whining over your side's loss, dude. You lefties excel at that. You remind me of butthurt Hillary supporters who still pretend she won the 2016 election when they cry about "muh popular vote!" lol.

Originally posted by Surtur
So Boris Johnson isn't your prime minister? Neat. Name who is.


Let the poor pathetic soul have his little pretend win.

52 is greater than 48.

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Yup. But Brexit support was strong in referendum party voters.

Originally posted by Robtard
Exactly, if the "the Left has gone too far to the Left!" is legit and not just a regurgitated talking point started at the top and filtered down through the media heads, then the youtubers and finally forum warriors, then the Right has certainly shifted too far to the Right. The right shift, if there is one, was mainly a reaction to the stupidity of the left.

Are you blaming your far-Right views or at least the ones you had from 2016-mid2019 on other people's "stupidity"? Are you not a master of your own mind?

I think you are in control of your own thoughts and views.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
52 is greater than 48.

Name your prime minister please.

Ease up on him, Surtur; you're gonna ruin his pretend winning and make him cry lol.

It gets kind of zen after a while. Life is a dream. Time is a river. 52 is greater than 48.

Kek it was a good saga.