Twitter has never slapped warnings on Iranian leaders glorifying violence
Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.
BrolyBlack
What a bunch of pussies
Surtur
They will get to it. They are busy going back fact checking all the tweets from reporters about Russian collusion over the past few years. Once they finish that they will get to the Iranians.
eThneoLgrRnae
LoL. Oh, I'm sure they will lol.
dadudemon
Originally posted by BrolyBlack
Twitter has never slapped warnings on Iranian leaders glorifying violence
What a bunch of pussies
https://i.imgur.com/x4FIdb8.gif
Bashar Teg
they only began this new "no exceptions to the rules" policy 2 days ago, so not sure what OP is trying to prove
Bashar Teg
no, it isn't. twitter did not retroactively amend trump's old lie-tweets from before new policy was enacted. but you go ahead and enjoy your baseless circlejerk

BrolyBlack
Feel free to see your way out of the thread
dadudemon
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
they only began this new "no exceptions to the rules" policy 2 days ago, so not sure what OP is trying to prove
So if anyone finds a single example of a tweeter that tried to keep the case going for the Russian hoax stuff, you'd agree that Twitter is unfairly applying their rules?
Bashar Teg
what part of "new policy" + "no exception to the rules" was I unclear about?
Darth Thor
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
they only began this new "no exceptions to the rules" policy 2 days ago, so not sure what OP is trying to prove
Broly is a bit dumb.
Quick to whine and ***** but never fought for a good cause in his life.
BrolyBlack
Originally posted by Darth Thor
Broly is a bit dumb.
Quick to whine and ***** but never fought for a good cause in his life.
More slander and lies, your a piece of shit and loser, nothing will change that
Bashar Teg
Originally posted by Darth Thor
Broly is a bit dumb.
Quick to whine and ***** but never fought for a good cause in his life.
I disagree with that part about "a bit"
BrolyBlack
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
I disagree with that part about "a bit"
Try to get a life, or a girlfriend. It might help your impotent rage syndrome
dadudemon
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
what part of "new policy" + "no exception to the rules" was I unclear about?
Okay, so if they want to keep arguing with you, they just have to find a single example and end the argument, then move on...
Then we don't have to argue for 30 pages.
Bashar Teg
Originally posted by dadudemon
And before anyone gets buttmad
dadudemon
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
No U!
https://i.imgur.com/NjkQgxd.jpg
eThneoLgrRnae
Originally posted by Darth Thor
Broly is a bit dumb.
Quick to whine and ***** but never fought for a good cause in his life.
Broly honorably served his country which is probably more than I can say for you.
Robtard
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
they only began this new "no exceptions to the rules" policy 2 days ago, so not sure what OP is trying to prove
It's Twitter's fault for not inventing time travel and apply this new rule to tweets from the past. See now?
BrolyBlack
Originally posted by Robtard
It's Twitter's fault for not inventing time travel and apply this new rule to tweets from the past. See now?
Trump did invent time travel
Surtur
Originally posted by dadudemon
So if anyone finds a single example of a tweeter that tried to keep the case going for the Russian hoax stuff, you'd agree that Twitter is unfairly applying their rules?
We've already got proof of them not being consistent.
So these places bring this shit on themselves when they can't be consistent and they lack the sac to admit it.
dadudemon
Originally posted by Surtur
We've already got proof of them not being consistent.
So these places bring this shit on themselves when they can't be consistent and they lack the sac to admit it.
Just find a single example. PVS is not being unreasonable with his "bar" for this particular case. Find one, argument is done.
Surtur
Originally posted by dadudemon
Just find a single example. PVS is not being unreasonable with his "bar" for this particular case. Find one, argument is done.
Lol but is it even worth it cuz I can see these weasels already busting out excuses with "well he's the president". But nah Surty don't play that bullshit game. They need to apply this shit equally.
If they lack the resources to apply it equally then do not do it.
Surtur
Actually lol nah. He's not getting anything. I posted the proof in another thread and just noticed he responded with "whataboutism".
Oh well, weasels gonna weasel.
dadudemon
Originally posted by Surtur
Lol but is it even worth it cuz I can see these weasels already busting out excuses with "well he's the president". But nah Surty don't play that bullshit game. They need to apply this shit equally.
If they lack the resources to apply it equally then do not do it.
No, he made his point very clear. Check the previous page: there's no weasel-room. So just prove your point and the topic is done. We're talking about it more than he is.
Post just a single example from the last 2 days to prove your point.
Surtur
I already posted twitter not being consistent in another thread.
He cried whataboutism.
So if I post it again here what do you feel will change?
Surtur
And just to be clear I said nothing about Russian hoax tweets I said we have proof of them not being consistent. And we do. And I posted it.
And weasels...weaseled.
Surtur
Originally posted by Surtur
And so it begins. They already aren't being consistent.
Twitter Censors Trump Tweet Denouncing Riots; Took No Action On Tweets Supporting Riots
Just for kicks tho.
Robtard
Originally posted by dadudemon
Post just a single example from the last 2 days to prove your point.
^Surt, well?
dadudemon
Originally posted by Surtur
Just for kicks tho.
Okay. So you're point is proven. This happened in the last 2 days.
Case closed. No argument.
To be clear, the case was proven that Twitter censored Trump for his violation of their policies but Twitter did not censor others for their exact violation of those same polices, all within the last 2 days, right?
Meaning, they have lost their section 230 immunity and have now opened themselves up for massive amounts of litigation.
Surtur
Originally posted by Robtard
^Surt, well?
Originally posted by dadudemon
Okay. So you're point is proven. This happened in the last 2 days.
Case closed. No argument.
To be clear, the case was proven that Twitter censored Trump for his violation of their policies but Twitter did not censor others for their exact violation of those same polices, all within the last 2 days, right?
Meaning, they have lost their section 230 immunity and have no opened themselves up for massive amounts of litigation.

Surtur
Now I'm not actually saying something should or shouldn't be done I'm saying they can no longer cry about it. They bring it on themselves.
And if the excuse is that the technology isn't up to snuff then they shouldn't have rolled this out now. But a Karen called and complained to the manager about Trump being mean.
Oh well, they reap what they sow, that's how it go. I have zero sympathy and I sure as f*ck don't wanna see leftists cry about the 1st amendment. It's not sincere.
Old Man Whirly!
False equivalence is retarded.
Surtur
And we see the excuses already.
This is why the left just brings it on themselves. You gutless dweebs can't even call a spade a spade. Oh well

Bashar Teg
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
False equivalence is retarded.
*special
Old Man Whirly!
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
*special

eThneoLgrRnae
Originally posted by Surtur
And we see the excuses already.
This is why the left just brings it on themselves. You gutless dweebs can't even call a spade a spade. Oh well
Yeah, it's sad and quite pathetic.
Old Man Whirly!
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Yeah, it's sad and quite pathetic. durwank
Surtur
I did warn them that if these companies didn't get their shit together something like this would happen and they'd be targeted.
Looks like I was correct. Oh well. They certainly had plenty of chances to change.
Text-only Version: Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.
Copyright 1999-2025 KillerMovies.