Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

https://www.ajc.com/news/fbi-finds-evidence-antifa-involvement-national-unrest/qVI3U9wb8Q6u1QEvVsJ7AJ/

Stupid, gullible, hate filled, fascist enabling Trumpers.

How do you like them apples?

everyone with a cool head, capable of objective thinking, and doing minimal research spotted it from the start, whirly. I was accused of "shilling for antifa", "confirmation bias", being "on the wrong side of the law, etc.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
explain this then:
https://twitter.com/antifaintl?lang=en

divisive twitter troll accounts are easy to make. ask putin
as far as the link you provided
https://archive.fo/https://twitter.com/ANTIFA_US/status/1267184839339290625

appears to have just been made today

why should i believe it was genuine? convince me, black lion

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
everyone with a cool head, capable of objective thinking, and doing minimal research spotted it from the start, whirly. I was accused of "shilling for antifa", "confirmation bias", being "on the wrong side of the law, etc. The thing is, we have been o er this million times, you, rob, me and many others have given multiple examples of Police, Alt-right incels and non incels wtc. Killing people, Antifa... not so much, because it simply doesn't happen. Apples and oranges, except the apples are rotten.

do you think trumpers will even acknowledge that they were completely wrong about who was behind the agitation? i'm sure they won't try to opportunistically derail this topic, just to avoid the facts

oh btw, here is the actual thimble where their intellectual honesty is kept. as you can see, it's empty

https://i.imgur.com/31zly6D.jpg

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
do you think trumpers will even acknowledge that they were completely wrong about who was behind the agitation? i'm sure they won't try to opportunistically derail this topic, just to avoid the facts

oh btw, here is the actual thimble where their intellectual honesty is kept. as you can see, it's empty

https://i.imgur.com/31zly6D.jpg I'm sure you are right, why would Trumpers try and derail this thread?) And no, they will never admit it

maybe now that white supremacists have been identified by the fbi as the very agitators which trumpers were (so passionately) seeking out, they will support white nationalists being federally labeled as a terrorist group.

(i would disagree of course, since fascism and antifascism are ideals protected under the 1st amendment)

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
maybe now that white supremacists have been identified by the fbi as the very agitators which trumpers were (so passionately) seeking out, they will support white nationalists being federally labeled as a terrorist group.

(i would disagree of course, since fascism and antifascism are ideals protected under the 1st amendment) Rather than labelling groups, I hope they go after the identified individual white supremacists with the same but non lethal zeal the Police might take down an unarmed black man.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
https://www.ajc.com/news/fbi-finds-evidence-antifa-involvement-national-unrest/qVI3U9wb8Q6u1QEvVsJ7AJ/

Stupid, gullible, hate filled, fascist enabling Trumpers.

How do you like them apples?

Before you guys HI-5 each other anymore did you manage to read the supporting documents to the news story that linked? Because the story you linked from AJC didn't originate the sotry it was just a scooper that pulled the story from:

https://www.thenation.com/article/activism/antifa-trump-fbi/

Which didn't even attempt to hide it's framing and click bait title:



They didn't have evidence for 1 event lulz not the entire set of riots. I found this really neat older article the other day you should reread

Understanding "Post-Trump Stress Disorder

Originally posted by snowdragon
Before you guys HI-5 each other anymore did you manage to read the supporting documents to the news story that linked? Because the story you linked from AJC didn't originate the sotry it was just a scooper that pulled the story from:

https://www.thenation.com/article/activism/antifa-trump-fbi/

Which didn't even attempt to hide it's framing and click bait title:



They didn't have evidence for 1 event lulz not the entire set of riots. I found this really neat older article the other day you should reread

Understanding "Post-Trump Stress Disorder



we've moved on from that, no evidence was found Snow. https://www.forbes.com/sites/carlieporterfield/2020/06/03/twitter-suspends-account-copying-trumps-tweets-for-glorifying-violence/

Originally posted by snowdragon
Before you guys HI-5 each other anymore did you manage to read the supporting documents to the news story that linked? Because the story you linked from AJC didn't originate the sotry it was just a scooper that pulled the story from:

https://www.thenation.com/article/activism/antifa-trump-fbi/

Which didn't even attempt to hide it's framing and click bait title:



They didn't have evidence for 1 event lulz not the entire set of riots. I found this really neat older article the other day you should reread

Understanding "Post-Trump Stress Disorder





Lol, get these facts outta here.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
we've moved on from that, no evidence was found Snow. https://www.forbes.com/sites/carlieporterfield/2020/06/03/twitter-suspends-account-copying-trumps-tweets-for-glorifying-violence/

You are correct no evidence was found on May 31st in washington dc during the layeffete protest, that's all that was confirmed. The rest of the information you insinuated was not supported by facts just bro-science ass slapping

You know the only time I read Trump tweets is on this forum.

Anyway the real news that you attempted to frame an incorrect narrative from is this:



Also I'm sure white supremists or other ass hat groups are also taking advantage of this chaos, I'm just not in denial over the ass hattery.

Originally posted by snowdragon
Before you guys HI-5 each other anymore did you manage to read the supporting documents to the news story that linked? Because the story you linked from AJC didn't originate the sotry it was just a scooper that pulled the story from:

https://www.thenation.com/article/activism/antifa-trump-fbi/

Which didn't even attempt to hide it's framing and click bait title:


where is the part which proves the article wrong?



https://www.thenation.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/FBI-1.jpg
https://www.thenation.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/FBI-2.jpg
https://www.thenation.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/FBI-3.jpg

also, the burden of proof is on the one who claims that antifa were involved. "proof" does not include single day twitter accounts, "but trump said it", and "but the agitators were wearing black, so they must be antifa"

where's the proof?

Originally posted by snowdragon
You are correct no evidence was found on May 31st in washington dc during the layeffete protest, that's all that was confirmed. The rest of the information you insinuated was not supported by facts just bro-science ass slapping

You know the only time I read Trump tweets is on this forum.

Anyway the real news that you attempted to frame an incorrect narrative from is this:



Also I'm sure white supremists or other ass hat groups are also taking advantage of this chaos, I'm just not in denial over the ass hattery. O.K. fair and balanced so, no evidence on Antifa as far as we know from released info. So, why does Trump want to break the US law and label them based on these riots?

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
O.K. fair and balanced so, no evidence on Antifa as far as we know from released info. So, why does Trump want to break the US law and label them based on these riots?

He doesn't have the authority to actually label Antifa terrorists as an organization, they can just go after acts that can be labeled domestic acts of terror just like when white nationalists or whoever do said acts. Twitter is just his mental masterbation that he then spews forth, it's messy and I don't want that shit getting in my eye.



The title of the thread framed a narrative that alluded to Antifa having no part in ANY riots, so I read the article, then I read the supporting article that the threads narrative was framed from and pulled out the appropriate information regarding Antifa's involvement which specifically said on May 31st in regards to Layfette Plaza, no other location/time was mentioned, which means they (Antifa) could be a part of any other protest or riot no mentioned in said intelligence document.

Originally posted by snowdragon
He doesn't have the authority to actually label Antifa terrorists as an organization, they can just go after acts that can be labeled domestic acts of terror just like when white nationalists or whoever do said acts. Twitter is just his mental masterbation that he then spews forth, it's messy and I don't want that shit getting in my eye.



The title of the thread framed a narrative that alluded to Antifa having no part in ANY riots, so I read the article, then I read the supporting article that the threads narrative was framed from and pulled out the appropriate information regarding Antifa's involvement which specifically said on May 31st in regards to Layfette Plaza, no other location/time was mentioned, which means they (Antifa) could be a part of any other protest or riot no mentioned in said intelligence document. Don't disagree, but isn't it awful he behaves in this way.

Snow, it's a leaked account from an anon fbi agent concerning a completely relevant and recent protest-turned-riot. you seem to be suggesting that we need leaked accounts from every riot in order to prove that antifa wasn't involved in agitating. not only are you shifting burden of proof, but you're doing it such a way in which, as per your implied requirements, the misapplied burden of proof is downright impossible to accomplish.

also i agree about the stupidity of trying to federally ban an ideal. so much for far-right ranting over the "thought police" coming to get us all. turns out, they might be, and their hero trump is trying to send them

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
Snow, it's a leaked account from an anon fbi agent concerning a completely relevant and recent protest-turned-riot. you seem to be suggesting that we need leaked accounts from every riot in order to prove that antifa wasn't involved in agitating. not only are you shifting burden of proof, but you're doing it such a way in which, as per your implied requirements, the misapplied burden of proof is downright impossible to accomplish.

also i agree about the stupidity of trying to federally ban an ideal. so much for far-right ranting over the "thought police" coming to get us all You're quite right.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
Snow, it's a leaked account from an anon fbi agent...


Be right back, I'll "leak" an FBI document that fits whatever narrative I want.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Be right back, I'll "leak" an FBI document that fits whatever narrative I want. O.K. good luck with that!

Fact check: Unlikely

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
O.K. good luck with that!

Fact check: Unlikely

Fact check: fact check

dur

thanks for bumping your shitpost hugbox threads off the front page