Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

which of these objects is the most durable?: bracelets of Wonder Woman, Shield of Captain America, chains of kerenthium, Adamatium, uru or Destroyer

Going with Adamantium.

Captain America shield, Destroyer Armor, then adamantium.

Destroyer armor.

Diana's bracelets.

Eat shit, Stilt.

The chains easily. They have the greatest strength feat barr none.

Any other choice is wrong and was made due to bias.

What is the greatest feat for the chains

Cap shield

Originally posted by HumbleServant
What is the greatest feat for the chains

https://i.imgur.com/ieekRQD.jpg

Yes, them getting shattered is their only feat

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
Yes, them getting shattered is their only feat

Being shattered is not a feat for them but for Superman.
Their actual feat is towing stars at astronomical times the speed of light. In other words, being tough enough to withstand more than millions of star weights of force.

Guys we go by feats. The object with the greatest quantifiable feat wins. Lets stop with the faulty bias opinions shall we. Be objective for once.

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
Yes, them getting shattered is their only feat

This

Originally posted by h1a8
Guys we go by feats. The object with the greatest quantifiable feat wins. Lets stop with the faulty bias opinions shall we. Be objective for once.

Which item is more durable, Adamantium or vibranium and explain why

Originally posted by carver9
Which item is more durable, Adamantium or vibranium and explain why Adamantium because it has the better durability feat.

Originally posted by h1a8
Being shattered is not a feat for them but for Superman.
Their actual feat is towing stars at astronomical times the speed of light. In other words, being tough enough to withstand more than millions of star weights of force.

Not an actual feat, more of a statement.

Originally posted by h1a8
Adamantium because it has the better durability feat.

Lol... fts that you've seen, right? Not statements. Statements does not equal fts. I wish it did since Gladiator son saw him rip a black hole in half. Hulk is the most powerful being in existence. Silver Surfer has ignited Sun's. The chains is ftless, so in this thread, it autoloses.

If statements were valid, Carver would have a stroke reading any random half-dozen Superman comics.

Only a total animal would make stroke jokes in this dark hour.

Originally posted by -Pr-
If statements were valid, Carver would have a stroke reading any random half-dozen Superman comics.

YES!! I would because he have a scan out there saying he is the most powerful being in existence and we can't have that. Multiple scans saying he is the most powerful in the multiverse, universe, etc...

Is it true that you were Zimbabwe's first Super Soldier?

Yes

Originally posted by carver9
Lol... fts that you've seen, right? Not statements. Statements does not equal fts. I wish it did since Gladiator son saw him rip a black hole in half. Hulk is the most powerful being in existence. Silver Surfer has ignited Sun's. The chains is ftless, so in this thread, it autoloses.

I said feats. Things that actually happened. Adamantium >>> vibranium. The bit about Gladiator is irrelevant to the thread.

Originally posted by h1a8
I said feats. Things that actually happened. Adamantium >>> vibranium. The bit about Gladiator is irrelevant to the thread.

What do you mean by things that actually happened?

Originally posted by carver9
What do you mean by things that actually happened?

Per writer intent.

But what does that have to do with you putting vibranium over adamantium? Are you going by feats?

Originally posted by h1a8
Per writer intent.

But what does that have to do with you putting vibranium over adamantium? Are you going by feats?

So we are mentioning writers intent again? Gotcha. The same person that mentioned the chains said that these robots are stronger, smarter and faster than Superman and also said that they are built with technology beyond his comprehension. Do you agree?

https://ibb.co/j4z3hFX

Here is where he say that...

https://ibb.co/KF1PW46

Let's give credit here, Superman was shown as the most powerful hero in this book (by far looking at everything that took place) but the chain ft should not be an indication of that since the person that was talking is inconsistent.

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
Only a total animal would make stroke jokes in this dark hour.

Damn, completely slipped my mind when I was writing it too.

Apologies for that one.

Originally posted by carver9
YES!! I would because he have a scan out there saying he is the most powerful being in existence and we can't have that. Multiple scans saying he is the most powerful in the multiverse, universe, etc...

The next time you try to pass off statements as evidence, I'll remember you made this post.

Originally posted by -Pr-
Damn, completely slipped my mind when I was writing it too.

Apologies for that one.



The next time you try to pass off statements as evidence, I'll remember you made this post.

I've never used this as a ft for Gladiator and never will and the chain ft have more context than just a statement.

https://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/11113/111138490/4214429-0190382615-oNjS7.jpg

Those robots are not more powerful than Superman.
Those robots are not stronger than Superman.
Those robots are not faster than Superman.
Those robots are not beyond Superman comprehension.
Those robots can't beat Superman.
Those robots are not unbeatable.

This is everything this guy said in that comic.

He was wrong when it came to Superman.

Does that automatically mean his entire history is wrong?

If I say I am stronger than Carver (because I honestly believe I am), then am proven wrong....does that mean my statement yesterday about the sky being blue is wrong?

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
the sky being blue

You're sure you want to open that can of worms?

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
You're sure you want to open that can of worms?

Lmao, ok, 2+2 being equal to 4. Carver's real name. cdtm being...well, who he is. Whatever.

@ cdtm