Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

https://youtu.be/CgSEiG3kZR8

This is where actual, real science is being taught, unlike the pseudo-science being pushed in public schools to brainwash children and destroy their faith.

Every science experiment here has a relevant spiritual lesson that comes with it.

This is a cool thread.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
https://youtu.be/CgSEiG3kZR8

This is where actual, real science is being taught, unlike the pseudo-science being pushed in public schools to brainwash children and destroy their faith.

Every science experiment here has a relevant spiritual lesson that comes with it. nutty dur

Nah... TRUTH.

Honestly, no sane person gives a shit.

Originally posted by Eon Blue
This is a cool thread.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
https://youtu.be/CgSEiG3kZR8

This is where actual, real science is being taught, unlike the pseudo-science being pushed in public schools to brainwash children and destroy their faith.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Nah, insects are not animals no matter how many times retards keep repeating they are. I don't give a shit what the official classification system says.

Insects are not animals, wtf

What's being taught: The Earth is around 6,000 years old, dinosaurs and every other animal that has ever existed, existed at the same time on the planet alongside humans, that is until a magical global flood wiped most of them out and by god, insects are not animals.


That is not grounded in science, that is grounded in silliness.

If you told me the end of the "science tour" finished in the basement without the kids parents, I would totally believe you.

Originally posted by Eon Blue
This is a cool thread.


Thanks.

Unfortunately it doesn't look like the trolls share your opinion.

@eThneoLgrRnae, I have no problem with you personally believing the fairy tale level stories that you believe.

But passing them off as "science" is just silly. Your beliefs are based on faith; not science. That's fine.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Thanks.

Unfortunately it doesn't look like the trolls share your opinion.
I mean, you opened the thread by accusing schools of teaching pseudoscience, instead of science.

It's not like you made this in good faith, and don't actually seem interested in discussing science. Trolling seems like an appropriate response tbh.

Or have you changed your stance on insects not being animals?

Originally posted by Robtard
@eThneoLgrRnae, I have no problem with you personally believing the fairy tale level stories that you believe.

But passing them off as "science" is just silly. Your beliefs are based on faith; not science. That's fine.


Yeah this just makes him seem insecure in his Faith.

Originally posted by Robtard
What's being taught: The Earth is around 6,000 years old, dinosaurs and every other animal that has ever existed, existed at the same time on the planet alongside humans, that is until a magical global flood wiped most of them out and by god, insects are not animals.


That is not grounded in science, that is grounded in silliness. I mean, some people don't believe Dinosaurs existed. I've had someone I know personally and play D&D with literally say that death wasn't a thing until after humans were kicked out of Garden of Eden, so what people think were dinosaurs are just lizards who didn't die, because without a life span a normal lizard would grow just as large...

another attention seeking cultist retard thread

Originally posted by Kento
I mean, some people don't believe Dinosaurs existed. I've had someone I know personally and play D&D with literally say that death wasn't a thing until after humans were kicked out of Garden of Eden, so what people think were dinosaurs are just lizards who didn't die, because without a life span a normal lizard would grow just as large...

laughcry Did you laugh in his face?


Am jelly of the D&D though, do miss it

Originally posted by Robtard
laughcry Did you laugh in his face?


Am jelly of the D&D though, do miss it I kinda just looked at him dumbfounded. Like I couldn't believe it was a thing someone could believe.

Eon and Ethneo sitting in a thread

LOL.

You dumbass darwinists believe a bunch of nothing somehow created everything, that life began somehow from non-living matter, and that bacteria eventually became human beings lmao.


You dipshits have literally zero room to be mocking anyone else for their beliefs. Maybe you should examine your own retarded ass beliefs before you make fun of anyone else's.... just sayin'.

Oh, and calling what you believe "science" doesn't make your looney beliefs any less retarded either lol..... nor does using the lame argument "but...but...but da majority of da scientists agree wit us her derp!"

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Eon and Ethneo sitting in a thread


Pooooooty and Robbbbbie sittin' in a tree...

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
LOL.

You dumbass darwinists believe a bunch of nothing somehow created everything, that life began somehow from non-living matter, and that bacteria eventually became human beings lmao.


You dipshits have literally zero room to be mocking anyone else for their beliefs. Maybe you should examine your own retarded ass beliefs before you make fun of anyone else's.... just sayin'.

Oh, and calling what you believe "science" doesn't make your looney beliefs any less retarded either lol..... nor does using the lame argument "but...but...but da majority of da scientists agree wit us her derp!"

Spot on!

Eon and Ethneo still sitting in their tree.

It'll be ok, pooty. Your butt buddy robbie will be here in a few hours to soothe your pain, old man.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
It'll be ok, pooty. Your butt buddy robbie will be here in a few hours to soothe your pain, old man. crywank

Pooooty and robbbbie sittin' in a tree....

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Pooooty and robbbbie sittin' in a tree.... Haha I triggered you with that, you wish you'd though of it. crywank

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Haha I triggered you with that, you wish you'd though of it. crywank



LOL. You didn't think of that nursery ryhme, pooty.

It has been around for ages, old man.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
LOL. You didn't think of that nursery ryhme, pooty.

It has been around for ages, old man. I related it to Eon's "teasing" you and your "girl like" reaction. Strangely I imagine you both lisp a little.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
I related it to Eon's "teasing" you and your "girl like" reaction. Strangely I imagine you both lisp a little.


LOL.

You really need to work more on your trolling, old man.

You're slipping.

Originally posted by Robtard
@eThneoLgrRnae, I have no problem with you personally believing the fairy tale level stories that you believe.

But passing them off as "science" is just silly. Your beliefs are based on faith; not science. That's fine. I actually do have a problem with people ignoring the hard science of our reality. The societal BS of agree to disagree as long as something is labeled a 'belief' is part of the reason the U.S. has been hit so hard by Covid.

I don't have a problem with people believing in their faith as long as they aren't hurting people or ignoring blatant reality for it.

We need people to be better educated.

Originally posted by Newjak
I actually do have a problem with people ignoring the hard science of our reality. The societal BS of agree to disagree as long as something is labeled a 'belief' is part of the reason the U.S. has been hit so hard by Covid.

I don't have a problem with people believing in their faith as long as they aren't hurting people or ignoring blatant reality for it.

We need people to be better educated. to be honest this is how I feel. I will go further and state as I have before, for many in poverty and or despair, heaven is almost all they have.

Originally posted by Newjak
I actually do have a problem with people ignoring the hard science of our reality. The societal BS of agree to disagree as long as something is labeled a 'belief' is part of the reason the U.S. has been hit so hard by Covid.

I don't have a problem with people believing in their faith as long as they aren't hurting people or ignoring blatant reality for it.

We need people to be better educated.


Thats different though because thats directly hurting society and costing lives.

If however like Rob says, that someones belief in the history of the Earth and how humans and dinosaurs fit into that, completely contradicts current science, then as long as they acknowledge it contradicts science and dont hide that, it would be pretty harmless IMO.

As long as they also dont preach Science = Bad.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Thats different though because thats directly hurting society and costing lives.

If however like Rob says, that someones belief in the history of the Earth and how humans and dinosaurs fit into that, completely contradicts current science, then as long as they acknowledge it contradicts science and dont hide that, it would be pretty harmless IMO.

As long as they also dont preach Science = Bad. Yes but how many people actually do that? Specifically in order for them to maintain their beliefs they generally have to contradict the science and when asked about it will generally defend it by creating fallacious thinking.

Originally posted by Newjak
Yes but how many people actually do that? Specifically in order for them to maintain their beliefs they generally have to contradict the science and when asked about it will generally defend it by creating fallacious thinking. The thing with Ethneo and Co., they hang on to "rogue" scientists, people who have some (to the trumper) impressive qualifications. However, when you scratch the surface, regardless of if those qualifications are real or they are not you find they are figures of ridicule within their field. That is, apart from amongst other "fringe" nut jobs. It's all a bit like Eon, Ethneo, CDTM and Squall here!

In their case it is so ignorant and extreme it can only be trolling.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae

You dumbass darwinists believe a bunch of nothing somehow created everything, that life began somehow from non-living matter, and that bacteria eventually became human beings lmao.

You dipshits have literally zero room to be mocking anyone else for their beliefs. Maybe you should examine your own retarded ass beliefs before you make fun of anyone else's.... just sayin'.

Oh, and calling what you believe "science" doesn't make your looney beliefs any less retarded either lol..... nor does using the lame argument "but...but...but da majority of da scientists agree wit us her derp!"
Originally posted by StyleTime
Well, good to see you still don't understand the science you claim to argue against.

Big Bang Theory, for the millionth time, doesn't state that everything came from nothing.

Everything was already there, compressed into a super dense, super hot state. The "Big Bang" is the rapid expansion of everything from that early form.

Although, I'm sure you'll just call me one of Satan's minions again, instead of listening.

How are things made?

Give him time to google what some atheist website says to come up with some bullshit answer before he replies lol.

He's gotta check what so-called "experts" say about that first.

I don't usually bother engaging with darwinists anymore. Their worldview is not even remotely defensible.

It's easily debunkable on so many levels but no matter how many times you demonstrate it to them they just deny it and keep replying with "nuh uh" or "it's science!" or "da majority of scentists say it's true!" or "her derp you're just a stupid creationist who doesn't understand da evolutuon her derp."

^ yup, pretty much.

Nah, it's a waste of time debating science with someone who denies actual laws of science when he believes in the big bang, abiogenesis, and darwinian macroevolution nonsense.

Whatever....not playing semantical word games with you.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
What on Earth are you rambling on about? God knows he is on his other account now.

Originally posted by Eon Blue
How are things made?
Depends on what you mean by "thing." Cars, or the universe?

I'll assume you meant the universe, due to what was being discussed beforehand.
Originally posted by StyleTime
No one knows if the universe had a beginning or not. It hasn't been proven either way, yet.

That's what is cool about science -- it's okay to say you don't know.

We don't know what happened before the Big Bang. The Big Bang is simply stating what happened to the "stuff" that was there. It's possible that "stuff" wasn't always there, and it's possible it was always there. We don't know yet.

The important thing, is to wait for more evidence before drawing conclusions, which Star doesn't seem to understand.

^ To be fair though we only have our own life times to come to our own conclusions. Hence nothing wrong with using the info we have to come to our own beliefs about how the Universe came about, or Choose to have Faith.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
^ To be fair though we only have our own life times to come to our own conclusions. Hence nothing wrong with using the info we have to come to our own beliefs about how the Universe came about, or Choose to have Faith.


How I see it.


I'm not about to try and argue why faith is "right", because what people believe is personal. Engaging in "prove you're not wrong" is pretty much asking for trouble.

I'll also say atheists love to target low hanging fruit, for the most part. Arguing on one hand against Islamaphobia while attacking Christians is pure hypocrisy, if the same person argues from both fronts on different days.


If they attack all religions equally, I would have more respect for that stance, but I still wouldn't engage them, because again is useless.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Nah, it's a waste of time debating science with someone who denies actual laws of science when he believes in the big bang, abiogenesis, and darwinian macroevolution nonsense.
Yet again, you don't understand any of these things.

Abiogenesis isn't a belief. It's an area of study with hypotheses that are still being tested. So far, experiments have shown that simple organic matter can arise from natural, "random" chemical processes though. The Miller-Urey experiments are the classic example, as I've told you before, and modern experiments continue to show evidence too. Miller-Urey produced organic molecules, including ones found in our genetic code, from chemical processes similar to ones present during Earth's formative years. You needed an energy source, of course, but stuff like lightning or radiation can account for that.

No one said it's a fact, but "Primordial Soup" Hypothesis currently has more evidence supporting it than God. It has more evidence than even Panspermia Hypothesis as far as I know.

Why wouldn't we continue to investigate the things producing evidence? That is science's job.

Originally posted by Newjak
I actually do have a problem with people ignoring the hard science of our reality. The societal BS of agree to disagree as long as something is labeled a 'belief' is part of the reason the U.S. has been hit so hard by Covid.

I don't have a problem with people believing in their faith as long as they aren't hurting people or ignoring blatant reality for it.

We need people to be better educated.

I feel ya, believe me. But when it comes to religion, I don't care what people believe, as long as it's not hurting someone else. eg Believe in talking snakes and magical gardens all you like, the problem is when people use that belief to deny equal rights to people, eg like same-sex marriages.


The denying and downplaying over covid is another animal, as that had real world implications and hurt to killed people.

Originally posted by StyleTime
Yet again, you don't understand any of these things.

Originally posted by Robtard
I feel ya, believe me. But when it comes to religion, I don't care what people believe, as long as it's not hurting someone else. eg Believe in talking snakes and magical gardens all you like, the problem is when people use that belief to deny equal rights to people, eg like same-sex marriages.


The denying and downplaying over covid is another animal, as that had real world implications and hurt to killed people. Agree 100%

Originally posted by Darth Thor
^ To be fair though we only have our own life times to come to our own conclusions. Hence nothing wrong with using the info we have to come to our own beliefs about how the Universe came about, or Choose to have Faith.
Personally, I'm okay not drawing a conclusion, even if we die not knowing. But, I also believe people are welcome to their beliefs.

I just don't want people calling it science. Science has very specific rules, and it's not allowed to make conclusions about things it can't support.

I know you understand this, but Star is really having trouble with this idea.
Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Give him time to google what some atheist website says to come up with some bullshit answer before he replies lol.

He's gotta check what so-called "experts" say about that first.
He's even constructed some strange scenario where the actual scientists are not the authorities on science.

I could recommend Sean Carroll, Lawrence Krauss, or some other cosmologist, and he'd accuse then of being "establishment" scientists or something.

Originally posted by cdtm
Arguing on one hand against Islamaphobia while attacking Christians is pure hypocrisy, if the same person argues from both fronts on different days.


If they attack all religions equally, I would have more respect for that stance, but I still wouldn't engage them, because again is useless.


I think their point usually is all Religions are nonesense and no good for society but not to spread hatred.

Which I agree with. Argue against Hijab or for abortion, but no need to spread hate towards a group or indirectly via their faith.

But Ive noticed Americans tend not to argue policy so much. Its kind of their thing to just throw a label out instead.

Interestingly though yes I see more Islamaphobia from Christians than from Atheists. But I also dont see atheists attack Jesus the way Islamaphobes attack Muhammad.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
^ To be fair though we only have our own life times to come to our own conclusions. Hence nothing wrong with using the info we have to come to our own beliefs about how the Universe came about, or Choose to have Faith.



Agreed.

Originally posted by Eon Blue


Agreed. Eon Pr is waiting for you to forward your alleged death threats. So am I. In fact we all wait with baited breath...

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Eon Pr is waiting for you to forward your alleged death threats. So am I. In fact we all wait with baited breath...

Stop being so obsessive over me, old man. Just calm down and take your meds.

Originally posted by Eon Blue
Stop being so obsessive over me, old man. Just calm down and take your meds. So I'll take that as a concession.

Whirly, I love you!

Take me with you on your trip to the moon midget!

Originally posted by Eon Blue
Whirly, I love you!

Take me with you on your trip to the moon midget! dur

The beef stew tastes good today, but the chicken stew was way better.

Something, something, politics, Biden and Trump. There, I stayed on topic.

Originally posted by cdtm
How I see it.

I'm not about to try and argue why faith is "right", because what people believe is personal. Engaging in "prove you're not wrong" is pretty much asking for trouble.

I'll also say atheists love to target low hanging fruit, for the most part. Arguing on one hand against Islamaphobia while attacking Christians is pure hypocrisy, if the same person argues from both fronts on different days.

If they attack all religions equally, I would have more respect for that stance, but I still wouldn't engage them, because again is useless.
They do though. You can literally find the folks I mentioned debating Buddhists or Muslim scholars about these things too. Lawrence Krauss debating Hamza Tzortzis(Muslim) is particularly entertaining actually. Krauss has become a bit more like Richard Dawkins these days, unwilling to tolerate bullshit claims under the pretense of politeness. It doesn't matter what religion is doing it.

Sean Carroll is less combative, but does seek to spread scientific literacy in his public discourse. He has an interesting discussion with a Buddhist Scholar you could check out.

These are freely available on youtube and such.

I put theistic religions in the same boat, as none of them have evidence supporting their deities. I don't support hate based policies being created against them, and support freedom of religion though.

In the West, due to numbers, you will encounter Christianity far more often than other religions. For that reason, you will find more conflicts with Christianity. It's not being singled out. It just happens to be encountered the most.

Originally posted by Robtard
I feel ya, believe me. But when it comes to religion, I don't care what people believe, as long as it's not hurting someone else. eg Believe in talking snakes and magical gardens all you like, the problem is when people use that belief to deny equal rights to people, eg like same-sex marriages.


The denying and downplaying over covid is another animal, as that had real world implications and hurt to killed people.

They aren't equal though.


Tbh, childless straight couples should be denied marriage as well. The ENTIRE purpose of the benefits is to encourage having kids.


Just abolish the thing whole sale if kids are no longer a priority. Or call it marriage without the tax breaks and other perks.

Originally posted by cdtm
They aren't equal though.


Tbh, childless straight couples should be denied marriage as well. The ENTIRE purpose of the benefits is to encourage having kids.


Just abolish the thing whole sale if kids are no longer a priority. Or call it marriage without the tax breaks and other perks. So they should only be married if they already have children? So couples that eventually want kids shouldn't be allowed to be married either?

I think we should abolish marriage altogether.

Originally posted by Newjak
So they should only be married if they already have children? So couples that eventually want kids shouldn't be allowed to be married either?

If kids are the intent.

Think in terms of intent. Do you think the intent is for well to do childless couples to enhance their personal fortunes by the benefits of marriage? How is that fair to live in couples, or batchlers?

Kids cost money. If you don't want the investment, why should you personally benefit, just because "marriage"?

Well, we can at least all agree that insects are animals. Right?

Riiiiiight?

Originally posted by StyleTime
Well, we can at least all agree that insects are animals. Right?

Riiiiiight?

Absolutely.

According to what the bible calls animals, no, they are most certainly not.

And in the end the Bible >>> Carolus Linius (i know i probably spelled that wrong, i don't care; sue me) classification system.

Just as plants are not actually alive in the biblical sense of the word and whales count as fish by biblical classification.

Ffs, our classification system classifies humans as animals. We are not animals I don't care what anyone says (although many humans do act like animals).

God doesn't give a shit how we classify animals or plants. He is far smarter and wiser than we are, not to mention He is the One who made them all, and us as well.

https://youtu.be/mpx4ODP35VQ

Charles Manson beats everyone.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
According to what the bible calls animals, no, they are most certainly not.

And in the end the Bible >>> Carolus Linius (i know i probably spelled that wrong, i don't care; sue me) classification system.

Just as plants are not actually alive in the biblical sense of the word and whales count as fish by biblical classification.

Ffs, our classification system classifies humans as animals. We are not animals I don't care what anyone says (although many humans do act like animals).

God doesn't give a shit how we classify animals or plants. He is far smarter and wiser than we are, not to mention He is the One who made them all, and us as well. crywank top trolling.

^Such a loser.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
^Such a loser. R you have trouble with your R's?

Hey poooty, while you were here wasting time bullshitting around this forum your wife was out laughing at you behind your back while having nasty sexual encounters with real men like Tommy Robinson.

He might have a sister though.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
According to what the bible calls animals, no, they are most certainly not.

And in the end the Bible >>> Carolus Linius (i know i probably spelled that wrong, i don't care; sue me) classification system.

Just as plants are not actually alive in the biblical sense of the word and whales count as fish by biblical classification.

Ffs, our classification system classifies humans as animals. We are not animals I don't care what anyone says (although many humans do act like animals).

God doesn't give a shit how we classify animals or plants. He is far smarter and wiser than we are, not to mention He is the One who made them all, and us as well.


What's a fetus in the biblical classification system?

You don't have to have a wife to laugh at someone who is being cheated on behind their back.

Originally posted by cdtm
If kids are the intent.

Think in terms of intent. Do you think the intent is for well to do childless couples to enhance their personal fortunes by the benefits of marriage? How is that fair to live in couples, or batchlers?

Kids cost money. If you don't want the investment, why should you personally benefit, just because "marriage"? Wouldn't that mean Christians could never have kids because they're supposed to wait until marriage lol

Also as been pointed out some of the marriage laws are to protect the spouse as well. Yes mostly the wife but that was because women were expected to stay at home so if they got divorced a woman would literally walk away with nothing because she never had a chance to earn money.

There is also the medical parts of marriage. As in you may not be able to provide for your partner's health or be a part of their health decisions if you aren't married.

Now I agree there is a better system out there instead of tying everything to marriage directly but until that system is implemented every couple deserves the right to marriage because it offers important benefits they would be denied otherwise.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
You don't have to have a wife to laugh at someone who is being cheated on behind their back. crywank

Originally posted by samhain
He might have a sister though. is that plan b or plan a?

Originally posted by samhain
He might have a sister though.


Oh, is that what you limeys do? Sleep with your sisters?

Good to know.

Yep, I have a sister but she is married and I don't have sexual relations with relatives anyway, unlike you limeys apparently do.

Originally posted by Blakemore
is that plan b or plan a?


Well for you limeys it is apparently plan A.

crywank reeeeeeeee!

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Oh, is that what you limeys do? Sleep with your sisters?

Good to know.

Yep, I have a sister but she is married and I don't have sexual relations with relatives anyway, unlike you limeys apparently do.


I'm not the one who feels he needs to point out that they don't fvck their sister. The fact that you did that speaks volumes TBH.

I await your forthcoming 'no you'.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Correct, I don't.... nor do I want one... not yet anyway. I love the bachelor's life too much to give it up.



Yeah sure thats the reason youre not married.

Too funny

Originally posted by Blakemore
Too funny

I get the feeling that you laugh at just about anything, cuck.

Since you hate editing so much, this one's for you, I added nothing to this by the way.


Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
I have a sister but she is married and I don't have sex

Cucked by his own sister

Sex is overrated.

Originally posted by Blakemore
Cucked by his own sister


Oh, did the biggest cuckold of all just call me a cuck? Laughable.

Originally posted by Klaw
Sex is overrated.



Yeah, but having sex with your own sister is just plain gross.

Apparently though, according to the limey Samhain, brits like himself engage in that regularly.... ewww.... that's just yuckey..


I mean, it doesn't surprise me that drunk losers like little blakey do gross shit like that, but I didn't think it was so common among brits in general.


Just one more reason to be glad I'm not a limey, I guess.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Yeah, but having sex with your own sister is just plain gross.

Apparently though, according to the limey Samhain, brits like himself engage in that regularly.... ewww.... that's just yuckey.. projection

Yes, you often project, cuckold boy.

eThneo, are you under the impression that your words are in some way cutting? Because they aren't. Anyone who can read can see that I made no mention of us Brits doing our sisters, regularly or otherwise, which is likely why Blake accused you of projection as that's how it came across. My comment about you possibly having a sister even if you don't have a wife was a reference to you being a hilljack and nothing more.

That's not the first time, even today, that you've failed to understand words... kind of like a hilljack.

^

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
According to what the bible calls animals, no, they are most certainly not.

And in the end the Bible >>> Carolus Linius (i know i probably spelled that wrong, i don't care; sue me) classification system.

Just as plants are not actually alive in the biblical sense of the word and whales count as fish by biblical classification.

Ffs, our classification system classifies humans as animals. We are not animals I don't care what anyone says (although many humans do act like animals).

God doesn't give a shit how we classify animals or plants. He is far smarter and wiser than we are, not to mention He is the One who made them all, and us as well.
Honestly, I have no problem with this.

If you want to use the Biblical classification system, that's fine by me.

All I was saying is that science uses biological taxonomy. Humans and insects belong to Kingdom Animalia, and are considered animals. Some scientists want to abandon the idea of Kingdoms, but humans and insects are still animals under those newer models.

I just want people to know that theology is a different area of study from science. That's all.

Originally posted by StyleTime
Honestly, I have no problem with this.

If you want to use the Biblical classification system, that's fine by me.

All I was saying is that science uses biological taxonomy. Humans and insects belong to Kingdom Animalia, and are considered animals.

I just want people to know that theology is a different area of study from science. That's all. oh no no. Theology is science. Specifically the KJV of the Bible by preacher Kent Hovind where I get to learn that horned lizards can grow into triceratops because Jesus.

Or you know, you could read an actual textbook. I mean, ffs, I knew more about dinosaurs before my 10th birthday.