Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Source.

Virtue signaling by the Liberals.

This is just an excuse for a holiday, it means nothing.

The average Canadian doesn't give a shit and is doing nothing about it.

Originally posted by Klaw
This is just an excuse for a holiday, it means nothing.

The average Canadian doesn't give a shit and is doing nothing about it.

The average Rightist Canadian doesn't give a shit


ps Try to enjoy your extra day off and not be so bitter

^ true power.

Originally posted by Klaw
Source.

Virtue signaling by the Liberals.
hi eon wavey

Originally posted by Eon Blue
^ true power.
bye eon wavey

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
hi eon wavey


bye eon wavey

https://media2.s-nbcnews.com/j/MSNBC/Components/Video/201710/sq_Trudaeu_171018.focal-760x428.jpg

Well. Until the zombie apocalypse and everyone flocks to the Canadian wilderness thinking they can just pitch a single skin tent and live off berries and mushrooms before they get mauled to death by enormous grizzlies or freeze solid come winter.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Well. Until the zombie apocalypse and everyone flocks to the Canadian wilderness thinking they can just pitch a single skin tent and live off berries and mushrooms before they get mauled to death by enormous grizzlies or freeze solid come winter.
Enormous zombie grizzlies.

Why are people still talking about Canada like it's a real place? The politics of fictional countries don't matter.

WAKANDA FO EVVVAAAAAAA

ehhhhhh dere cuzzin, can i bum a smoke, brother?

Lol, Canada. ^^

https://mises.org/wire/mandatory-holidays-mean-less-freedom-and-flexibility-workers

Issuing new holidays is a perfidious way to control worker freedoms.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
https://mises.org/wire/mandatory-holidays-mean-less-freedom-and-flexibility-workers

Issuing new holidays is a perfidious way to control worker freedoms. Yo check it out. The libertarian Rockwell and Rothbard website arguing that their beloved capitalist markets are the ultimate way to protect workers rights by drawing a comparison to how awful a minimum wage is. Much surprise.


Well at least the United States isn't the only country that doesn't have mandatory paid vacations for employees... right?

Wait, no I meant that in the U.S. "The average number of paid vacation days offered by private employers is 10 days after 1 year of service, 14 days after 5 years, 17 days after 10 years, and 20 days after 20 years".

What awesome freedoms you have. What a great country. The Greatest country. Very pro-worker. Cares such for the everyman.

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
Yo check it out. The libertarian Rockwell and Rothbard website arguing that their beloved capitalist markets are the ultimate way to protect workers rights by drawing a comparison to how awful a minimum wage is. Much surprise.


Well at least the United States isn't the only country that doesn't have mandatory paid vacations for employees... right?

Wait, no I meant that in the U.S. "The average number of paid vacation days offered by private employers is 10 days after 1 year of service, 14 days after 5 years, 17 days after 10 years, and 20 days after 20 years".

What awesome freedoms you have. What a great country. The Greatest country. Very pro-worker. Cares such for the everyman.

The government is incredibly involved in the market, thus making America's economy fascistic, not capitalistic.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
The government is incredibly involved in the market, thus making America's economy fascistic, not capitalistic. If a key trait you correlate to fascism is "market intervention" then... well, first, grab a copy of this book because that is absolutely NOT what fascism is about.

And second, it would make every government, ever, "fascistic". Literally every government does things that intervene in the market.


Just as a thought... maybe reconsider the neoliberal paradigm when it comes to worshiping "the market". It smacks of hyper selfish greed.

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
If a key trait you correlate to fascism is "market intervention" then... well, first, grab a copy of this book because that is absolutely NOT what fascism is about.

And second, it would make every government, ever, "fascistic". Literally every government does things that intervene in the market.


Just as a thought... maybe reconsider the neoliberal paradigm when it comes to worshiping "the market". It smacks of hyper selfish greed.

Fascism is an offshoot of socialism, so yeah you're right.

Providing and receiving isn't selfish.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Fascism is an offshoot of socialism, so yeah you're right.

Providing and receiving isn't selfish. dur facepalm ummm National Socialism and Socialism are opposite ends of the police spectrum as has been explained to many other accounts that post in a very similar manner to you.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
dur facepalm ummm National Socialism and Socialism are opposite ends of the police spectrum as has been explained to many other accounts that post in a very similar manner to you.

Now they're not. National socialism is more akin to Stalinism-leninism, this is why Trotsky's call to world wide revolution was seen as sacrilegious.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Now they're not. National socialism is more akin to Stalinism-leninism, this is why Trotsky's call to world wide revolution was seen as sacrilegious. facepalm no it isn't!

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
facepalm no it isn't!

Socialism, nationalistic or not, means individuals do not privately own the means of production. Do you agree with that ?

Nationalism means an inherent priority towards race/religion/heritage/genetics etc

Let's take an example. Irish republicanism was a movement to preserve Irish heritage, tradition, genes, language, religion etc. It's arguably a nationalist movement even though they were technically the oppressed group. Would you call them socialist?

Originally posted by Blakemore
Nationalism means an inherent priority towards race/religion/heritage/genetics etc

Let's take an example. Irish republicanism was a movement to preserve Irish heritage, tradition, genes, language, religion etc. It's arguably a nationalist movement even though they were technically the oppressed group. Would you call them socialist?

It depends on whether they allowed individuals to own private property aka the means of production, or not.

To reword that: a country can be nationalistic and not socialist, nationalistic and socialist, not nationalistic and socialist, or not Nationalistic and not socialist.

I'd argue america is nationalistic and socialistic, plus corporatism = fascism.