Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Where will these billions of dollars come from ?

*yawn* Biden is still worst potus in American history. This massive spending bill doesn't change that. On the contrary, it is yet more proof that he is.

Thanks for proving my point, Trumpers

Americans are going to benefit from this, there's going to be a massive surge of jobs and sorely needed improvements to the country that the previous admin promised, but utterly failed to deliver. "We're going to have new everything!" -2017

You just want another free handout while you sit at home masturbating and eating potato chips.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Where will these billions of dollars come from ? Socialists like robbie thinks money grows on trees.

You don't care how it will be paid for ?

So odd when Trump was in office, it was spend, spend, spend, doesn't matter who's gonna pay. Tax cuts for the wealthiest people, not a problem. Now the concern over potential spending is foremost. Hmmm...

I'm so happy the prospect of a massive job influx in the very near future has Trumpers shitting themselves.

I said on here over a decade ago that the US should've embarked on huge infrastructure spending in the wake of the economic crash of 2008 because it's a tried and tested method of getting out of economic recession and would help future proof their economy. Its one of the few things Demoncrats and Republicans have generally agreed on yet petty partisanship on both sides has stifled it for years to the detriment of the American people.

Many of those spending plans are exactly what I said money should have been getting spent on. Specifically road, rail and high speed Internet.

Obviously other things have happened in the interim that also needed addressed like the power grid issue as shown in Texas and climate resilience as shown by Miami's dry day flooding.

I also previously mentioned the superfund sites too.

You should let me be President cos I'm way ahead of your shitty politicians

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Socialists like robbie thinks money grows on trees. Aren't dollars made out of paper?

Originally posted by Robtard
So odd when Trump was in office, it was spend, spend, spend, doesn't matter who's gonna pay. Tax cuts for the wealthiest people, not a problem. Now the concern over potential spending is foremost. Hmmm...

I'm so happy the prospect of a massive job influx in the very near future has Trumpers shitting themselves.

I'm not pro Trump and never was. He added more to the national debt than Obama. I've said this multiple times and refuse to believe that I don't believe the station of the presidency, or any state action is legitimate whatsoever.

Originally posted by Blakemore
Aren't dollars made out of paper?

Yes, and without being backed by gold are only held up via decree through violence.
When you support Fiat currency, you support war.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
I said on here over a decade ago that the US should've embarked on huge infrastructure spending in the wake of the economic crash of 2008 because it's a tried and tested method of getting out of economic recession and would help future proof their economy. Its one of the few things Demoncrats and Republicans have generally agreed on yet petty partisanship on both sides has stifled it for years to the detriment of the American people.

Many of those spending plans are exactly what I said money should have been getting spent on. Specifically road, rail and high speed Internet.

Obviously other things have happened in the interim that also needed addressed like the power grid issue as shown in Texas and climate resilience as shown by Miami's dry day flooding.

I also previously mentioned the superfund sites too.

You should let me be President cos I'm way ahead of your shitty politicians

Is superfund like crowd sourcing or something different ?

Originally posted by ilikecomics
I'm not pro Trump and never was. He added more to the national debt than Obama. I've said this multiple times and refuse to believe that I don't believe the station of the presidency, or any state action is legitimate whatsoever.

You're lying again, you were a Trumper until he lost.

I'm aware taxes pay for state action, the same way slavery used to. Did that make slavery moral and legitimate ?

Originally posted by Robtard
You're lying again, you were for on a Trumper until he lost.

No I wasn't lol I've always hated Trump. Before I was an an cap I was a big Sam Harris fan and agreed that Trump was a buffoon. I even used to talk about how Trump is a Russian agent and shared the wiki for Aleksandr dugin's book "foundation of geopolitics".

Originally posted by ilikecomics
I'm aware taxes pay for state action, the same way slavery used to. Did that make slavery moral and legitimate ?

https://i.imgur.com/63wy9g3.gif

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
I said on here over a decade ago that the US should've embarked on huge infrastructure spending in the wake of the economic crash of 2008 because it's a tried and tested method of getting out of economic recession and would help future proof their economy. Its one of the few things Demoncrats and Republicans have generally agreed on yet petty partisanship on both sides has stifled it for years to the detriment of the American people.

Many of those spending plans are exactly what I said money should have been getting spent on. Specifically road, rail and high speed Internet.

Obviously other things have happened in the interim that also needed addressed like the power grid issue as shown in Texas and climate resilience as shown by Miami's dry day flooding.

I also previously mentioned the superfund sites too.

You should let me be President cos I'm way ahead of your shitty politicians

I recall the conversation and yes you were.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
I'm aware taxes pay for state action, the same way slavery used to. Did that make slavery moral and legitimate ? Technically, it was legitimate. Moral, no. That's how oppressive nations operate.

Originally posted by Robtard
https://i.imgur.com/63wy9g3.gif

Explain why stealing is legitimate then.

Originally posted by Blakemore
Technically, it was legitimate. Moral, no. That's how oppressive nations operate.

How can something be legit but immoral ? So if rape was legalized it would be legit ?

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Is superfund like crowd sourcing or something different ?

Superfund sites are the list of contaminated locations usually the result of historical industry that require cleaning up before the land can be used for agriculture or residential purposes. Mostly the result of now defunct chemical companies dumping waste products before their adverse effects on human health were known or before regulations were implemented to stop the environmental impacts caused by those practices. I believe we discussed them briefly when talking about Capitalism and regulations when you argued that there didn't need to be legislation to force companies into more ethical practices and I used superfund sites as an example of why government enforced regulations were necessary.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Yes, and without being backed by gold are only held up via decree through violence.
When you support Fiat currency, you support war. And you're proud to beee an Ameri-CAN!

Originally posted by ilikecomics
How can something be legit but immoral ? So if rape was legalized it would be legit ? That's what legitimacy means. Learn some etymology.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Superfund sites are the list of contaminated locations usually the result of historical industry that require cleaning up before the land can be used for agriculture or residential purposes. Mostly the result of now defunct chemical companies dumping waste products before their adverse effects on human health were known or before regulations were implemented to stop the environmental impacts caused by those practices. I believe we discussed them briefly when talking about Capitalism and regulations when you argued that there didn't need to be legislation to force companies into more ethical practices and I used superfund sites as an example of why government enforced regulations were necessary.

I think you sent a two part YouTube video with a guy that had a Scottish accent ?

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Explain why stealing is legitimate then.

Sorry, if you want to do your "taxation is theft!" rant yet again, ziggy, go pull up one or the various threads already in existence.

This is about Biden's massive and historic infrastructure that will be creating MASSIVE amounts of jobs for Americans, which scares you.

Originally posted by Blakemore
That's what legitimacy means. Learn some etymology.

I can't believe you think violence sponsored legislation is good because the guys with the most guns said so.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
I think you sent a two part YouTube video with a guy that had a Scottish accent ?

I can't remember tbh. I remember Potholers videos of a conservative solution to global warming. He's not Scottish though.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
I can't believe you think violence sponsored legislation is good because the guys with the most guns said so. I didn't say it was good, I said it was immoral.

Legitimacy means it was legislated into law.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
I can't remember tbh. I remember Potholers videos of a conservative solution to global warming. He's not Scottish though. potholer54 is awesome. I think I've subscribed to him since 2006. His explanation of how stars were formed were like watching a Carl Sagan video.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
I can't remember tbh. I remember Potholers videos of a conservative solution to global warming. He's not Scottish though.

Why couldn't something like that be solved with crowd funding like boyan slat ?

Originally posted by Robtard
You're lying again, you were a Trumper until he lost. Trump never legite lost.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Why couldn't something like that be solved with crowd funding like boyan slat ?

It probably could help. As could charity involvement. I would hazard a guess that there are or have been examples of both but I haven't checked if there are or were.

There may also be private investment from companies that have long since bought over or merged with the old companies that were responsible for the contaminated sites. Again, though, I haven't checked.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
It probably could help. As could charity involvement. I would hazard a guess that there are or have been examples of both but I haven't checked if there are or were.

There may also be private investment from companies that have long since bought over or merged with the old companies that were responsible for the contaminated sites. Again, though, I haven't checked.

I think anything paid for with taxes automatically says the people don't want it, otherwise they'd go through free market channels.

But if you steal a third of people's wages it's harder for them to contribute to crowd sourcing.

Yes the people don't want uncontaminated land etc. That's why the people of Flint, Michigan love slurping up that poisonous water.

I'm sure we could crowd source roads, dams and electricity pylons while we're at it.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Trump never legite lost. *legit*

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Yes the people don't want uncontaminated land etc. That's why the people of Flint, Michigan love slurping up that poisonous water.

I'm sure we could crowd source roads, dams and electricity pylons while we're at it.

They don't and that's why people like Eddie vedder giving them bottled water did way more than anyone in the flint government.

Boyan slat did it and has cleaned up millions of tons of plastic. So yeah why couldn't we crowd source those things ?

This has been going on since the 90s. George Carlin did a routine where he said "I assume the water is safe to drink in New York?"

The audience screams "no!"

Originally posted by Blakemore
This has been going on since the 90s. George Carlin did a routine where he said "I assume the water is safe to drink in New York?"

The audience screams "no!"

I bet new yorkers were productive and bought clean water

"55 billion to replace lead service lines and provide clean drinking water"


There's going to be a lot of communities with shitty poisonous water getting clean water.

Originally posted by Robtard
"55 billion to replace lead service lines and provide clean drinking water"


There's going to be a lot of communities with shitty poisonous water getting clean water.

If they dont will you admit the plan is a flop ?

Only time will tell.

Trumpers are praying this flops, when it's jobs for Americans...

Originally posted by Robtard
Trumpers are praying this flops, when it's jobs for Americans...

Leftists don't understand bastiat's the seen vs. the unseen.

http://bastiat.org/en/twisatwins.html

Adware website, you filthy garbage person.

Also, name dropping something you known nothing about in an attempt to sound knowledgeable is a silly tactic.

Originally posted by Robtard
"55 billion to replace lead service lines and provide clean drinking water"


There's going to be a lot of communities with shitty poisonous water getting clean water.


55 billion won't even be enough to clean up one single city, the way government spending works.

Originally posted by Robtard
Adware website, you filthy garbage person.

Also, name dropping something you known nothing about in an attempt to sound knowledgeable is a silly tactic.

Idk what adware is but I read off the website just fine, I'm on duckduckgo so idk if that makes a difference.

Bastiat's parable describes a rock being thrown through the window of a baker. People rejoice for now the glass maker will have work, but this ignores that the baker won't be able to invest his surplus capital in making his product better, but instead in the acquisition of a new window.

In the case of the infrastructure bill giving people jobs, that can be analogized to those who argue it's good that the window maker will have work. However, all that stolen money will now not be consensually used to make products better, or to bolster other potential businesses.

I don't have a problem with employment, but I prefer it to be paid without stolen money.

That's the tax section of the "adware" article I posted.

Wow, it's almost like a straight copypasta of something daduderz wrote.

Originally posted by Blakemore
Wow, it's almost like a straight copypasta of something daduderz wrote.

I literally said I copy and pasted it. It's part of bastiat's argument, which I was referencing.

Originally posted by Blakemore
Wow, it's almost like a straight copypasta of something daduderz wrote.

And just us vaccuous.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Idk what adware is but I read off the website just fine, I'm on duckduckgo so idk if that makes a difference.

Bastiat's parable describes a rock being thrown through the window of a baker. People rejoice for now the glass maker will have work, but this ignores that the baker won't be able to invest his surplus capital in making his product better, but instead in the acquisition of a new window.

In the case of the infrastructure bill giving people jobs, that can be analogized to those who argue it's good that the window maker will have work. However, all that stolen money will now not be consensually used to make products better, or to bolster other potential businesses.

I don't have a problem with employment, but I prefer it to be paid without stolen money.

You should cast your mind back to the WSJ's CEO council in 2017 after being told their companies were to receive tax cuts in order for them to invest in creating new jobs and they almost all said they were just going to pocket the money for their shareholders.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
You should cast your mind back to the WSJ's CEO council in 2017 after being told their companies were to receive tax cuts in order for them to invest in creating new jobs and they almost all said they were just going to pocket the money for their shareholders.

Corporations are inventions of the state, not the free market.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
And just us vaccuous.

Lol you're calling Frederick bastiat's writing vacuous. Whatta dumbass.

Jesus Christ.... think you have way too much free time on your hands, ilikecomics, judging by your two extremely long ass posts on previous page.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Jesus Christ.... think you have way too much free time on your hands, ilikecomics.

Why is that ?

Again I didn't write those, Frederick bastiat did. I never pretended like I didn't copy and paste it

I edited my post for reason why.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Again I didn't write those, Frederick bastiat did. I never pretended like I didn't copy and paste it

Oh ok, it was a copy and paste.... nevermind then.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
I literally said I copy and pasted it. It's part of bastiat's argument, which I was referencing.

Lol I didn't see you're response.

Yeah I wouldn't say anything that long to these people, nor could I ever write that well.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Oh ok, it was a copy and paste.... nevermind then.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae


I was in defense mode because they accused me of copy pasta when I said multiple times I copied. Sorry about the friendly fire.

Not a big deal, forget about it.

It's not like it wounded me or anything.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Not a big deal, forget about it.

It's not like it wounded me or anything.

Stay cool, playa.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
You should cast your mind back to the WSJ's CEO council in 2017 after being told their companies were to receive tax cuts in order for them to invest in creating new jobs and they almost all said they were just going to pocket the money for their shareholders.

The free market will sort all that out too.

Originally posted by Robtard
The free market will sort all that out too.

A free market wouldn't have taxes, or tax cuts.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Corporations are inventions of the state, not the free market.


Provable by the fact they need government charters.

Originally posted by cdtm
Provable by the fact they need government charters.

And because the CEO can totally **** it up and not be held responsible.
Not being held accountable is a clear cut indicator that the state is involved.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
And because the CEO can totally **** it up and not be held responsible.
Not being held accountable is a clear cut indicator that the state is involved. The democratic state...

GOP lawmakers want to punish the 13 Republicans who voted for Biden's infrastructure bill by kicking them off congressional committees, report says



This cult of Trump turns on it's own people for even the smallest of infractions.

Originally posted by Blakemore
The democratic state...

Which is a nice name for the welfare-warfare redistribution state, which is inherently tyrannical.

Originally posted by cdtm
Provable by the fact they need government charters.
Originally posted by ilikecomics
And because the CEO can totally **** it up and not be held responsible.
Not being held accountable is a clear cut indicator that the state is involved.


Why do you guys hate capitalism?

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Which is a nice name for the welfare-warfare redistribution state, which is inherently tyrannical. If only you went to the DRC or North Korea, you'd know how ridiculous your views of the U.S. government are.

Originally posted by Robtard
Why do you guys hate capitalism?

Capitalism is when two people trade with mutual consent. I don't hate mutual consent. Not sure why you'd think that.

Originally posted by Blakemore
If only you went to the DRC or North Korea, you'd know how ridiculous your views of the U.S. government are.

Idk about the drc, but I'm very informed on nk and is part of the reason I'm an anarchist.

All states are more similar than dissimilar.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Capitalism is when two people trade with mutual consent. I don't hate mutual consent. Not sure why you'd think that.

Rob always makes disingenuous, bad faith arguments. Pay it no mind.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Rob always makes disingenuous, bad faith arguments. Pay it no mind.

I'm sure the state pays him In some way to hold his quaint little views.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Idk about the drc, but I'm very informed on nk and is part of the reason I'm an anarchist.

All states are more similar than dissimilar. The DRC is one of the worst run countries in the world.

Originally posted by Robtard
GOP lawmakers want to punish the 13 Republicans who voted for Biden's infrastructure bill by kicking them off congressional committees, report says



This cult of Trump turns on it's own people for even the smallest of infractions.



One way of looking at it.


Another is to note the Right is not a monolith in lockstep on every issue.


I consider that a good thing.

Um, there was only 13 and they're being punished for not falling in line. Same shit happened to the very few Republicans who voted to impeach Trump. GOP is all about falling in line or else.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Lol you're calling Frederick bastiat's writing vacuous. Whatta dumbass.

I am calling your copy/paste bullshit vaccuous. You did not read it, and neither is anyone else.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
I am calling your copy/paste bullshit vaccuous. You did not read it, and neither is anyone else.

Of course I read it, dummy. I enjoy reading and I have alot of time to do it because I'm not an insatiable sexual deviant.

Originally posted by Robtard
GOP lawmakers want to punish the 13 Republicans who voted for Biden's infrastructure bill by kicking them off congressional committees, report says



This cult of Trump turns on it's own people for even the smallest of infractions.

Representative Fred Upton revealed on Monday that he received a threatening voicemail just days after voting for the bipartisan infrastructure bill.

A person called him and left a message saying, "I hope you die. I hope everybody in your ****ing family dies," the caller reportedly added that the Republican lawmaker was a "****ing piece of shit traitor."

The Michigan lawmaker's office said that the threatening voicemail was not an isolated incident. After the vote, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene called the Republicans who supported the legislation "traitors" in a Tweet.

this bill is full of so much pork, I bet the majority of the money will be wasted.

Originally posted by Klaw
this bill is full of so much pork, I bet the majority of the money will be wasted.


Yeah, it has very little to do with infrastructure despite it's name. It has a lot to do with DESTROYING infrastructure though.


Such an "historic" bill lol.

This is exactly the type of stuff taxes should be used to pay for. Stuff that benefits everyone. Oh also healthcare for the population.

Originally posted by BackFire
This is exactly the type of stuff taxes should be used to pay for. Stuff that benefits everyone. Oh also healthcare for the population. Yup, it moves you further towards the enlightened states of Europe.

Originally posted by BackFire
This is exactly the type of stuff taxes should be used to pay for. Stuff that benefits everyone. Oh also healthcare for the population.

Nah... and the republicans who voted for this should be ashamed of themselves.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Nah... and the republicans who voted for this should be ashamed of themselves. silly cvnt, mmm Methneo durmask

In 2016 this is largely what Trump ran on and promised, all new roads, bridges, airports, electrical, plumbing, broadband, transit etc., infrastructure building galore.

Weird how his voters are now magically against it because he failed to deliver and Biden did it instead.

Originally posted by Robtard
In 2016 this is largely what Trump ran on and promised, all new roads, bridges, airports, electrical, plumbing, broadband, transit etc., infrastructure building galore.

Weird how his voters are now magically against it because he failed to deliver and Biden did it instead.

You mean the three entire years of throw mud at wall see what sticks impeachment attempts crippled Trumps administration? Imagine that!

^Deflecting from the point and typical Rightist blame-shifting, never taking responsibility


Trump had two years of a completely controlled Republican government under him. White House, Senate, House and Supreme Court.

Biden's seemingly able to get things done with strong Republican opposition looming over his head just the same. Odd.

Originally posted by Robtard
^Typical blame-shifting of the Right.

Biden's seemingly able to get things done with strong Republican opposition looking over his head. Odd. Oh the irony of you accusing others of blame-shifting. I've lost count of how many times you've tried to blame Trump for Biden's f***-ups.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Oh the irony of you accusing others of blame-shifting. I've lost count of how many times you've tried to blame Trump for Biden's f***-ups.


Indeed.


And the Justice Department, FBI, and CIA are filled to the brim with leftist trash. The entire Deep State was after Trump, and that same faction is not even checking in with the president before deciding illegal immigrants get 450k each, which Joe later claimed wasn't happening.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Of course I read it, dummy. I enjoy reading and I have alot of time to do it because I'm not an insatiable sexual deviant.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Oh the irony of you accusing others of blame-shifting. I've lost count of how many times you've tried to blame Trump for Biden's f***-ups.

Because you can't count to zero?

Originally posted by cdtm
Indeed.


And the Justice Department, FBI, and CIA are filled to the brim with leftist trash. The entire Deep State was after Trump, and that same faction is not even checking in with the president before deciding illegal immigrants get 450k each, which Joe later claimed wasn't happening.

Why do you hate law enforcement?

Originally posted by BackFire
This is exactly the type of stuff taxes should be used to pay for. Stuff that benefits everyone. Oh also healthcare for the population.




And because you pay taxes its your own money. And this is exactly the sort of thing you pay it for. For it to come back to you in some way, shape or form.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Oh the irony of you accusing others of blame-shifting. I've lost count of how many times you've tried to blame Trump for Biden's f***-ups. The only 2 I can think of are Afghanistan and illegal immigration.

On the latter, Trump pushed through a bill that was against human rights, so Biden is fixing a problem he caused. As for the former, Trump and Biden both wanted to end the war, Trump failed to do so, Biden succeeded.

What bill was against "Human Rights"?

Originally posted by Klaw
What bill was against "Human Rights"? Clinton.

Seriously though, it was arresting illegal immigrants and separating from their children who had to remain in Mexico. Separating children from their parents with no plan or means of survival is against human rights.

Originally posted by Darth Thor


And because you pay taxes its your own money. And this is exactly the sort of thing you pay it for. For it to come back to you in some way, shape or form.


They seemingly what the money spent on more F-22s we don't need and tax cuts for the rich.

Originally posted by Klaw
What bill was against "Human Rights"?


Blakey is just making shit up, as usual. Ignore him.

Originally posted by Blakemore
Seriously though, it was arresting illegal immigrants and separating from their children who had to remain in Mexico. Separating children from their parents with no plan or means of survival is against human rights.


Trump's policy was quite literally 'if you come here, we will take your children', that was the deterrent, never seeing your kids again. He's punishing children for the "crimes" of their parents.


Trump says family separations deter illegal immigration

The Trump administration knew migrant children would suffer from family separations. The government ramped up the practice anyway.

Originally posted by Robtard
They seemingly what the money spent on more F-22s we don't need and tax cuts for the rich. If it was up to Republicans, the only taxes they'd pay would be for the military so everyone can get jobs in the US military. You know, to stop fascism.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Oh the irony of you accusing others of blame-shifting. I've lost count of how many times you've tried to blame Trump for Biden's f***-ups.

Originally posted by Blakemore
If it was up to Republicans, the only taxes they'd pay would be for the military so everyone can get jobs in the US military. You know, to stop fascism.

They're completely cool with fascism now as long as it's one of theirs, what they want to fight against is the socialism bogeyman.

Originally posted by cdtm
55 billion won't even be enough to clean up one single city, the way government spending works.

If anyone thinks the money is not going to be wasted, they're retarded, period.

Rightist shitting themselves now that Biden pulled off another of Trump's failed promises, which they initially supported. To be excepted.

1988, after 8 years of Reagan ending with a recession, Biden runs for president and fails.

2008, after 8 years of Bush ending with a recession, Biden runs for president and fails.

2020, after 4 years of Trump ending with a recession and a pandemic, Biden runs for president and wins.

Just thought I'd point that out.

The first two are failing to win the Dem nomination, not the Presidency. The second he won as VP.

Spot on with the recessions though. Spend, spend, spend while giving tax breaks to the rich will do.

Originally posted by Robtard
The first two are failing to win the Dem nomination, not the Presidency. The second he won as VP.

Spot on with the recessions though. Spend, spend, spend while giving tax breaks to the rich will do. They're still technically fails, couldn't even win the nomination.

Yeah, they are still fails.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Representative Fred Upton revealed on Monday that he received a threatening voicemail just days after voting for the bipartisan infrastructure bill.

A person called him and left a message saying, "I hope you die. I hope everybody in your ****ing family dies," the caller reportedly added that the Republican lawmaker was a "****ing piece of shit traitor."

The Michigan lawmaker's office said that the threatening voicemail was not an isolated incident. After the vote, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene called the Republicans who supported the legislation "traitors" in a Tweet.

A recent vote for President Biden's bipartisan infrastructure bill has developed into a controversial, life-threatening exercise for Representative Andrew Garbarino, a New York Republican who broke with his party to support the legislation.

Nassau Police confirmed that Kenneth Gasper was arrested and charged with aggravated harassment for a death threat he made to Garbarino, according to Detective Lieutenant Richard LeBrun.

"It's amazing people want to kill me over paving roads and clean water," Garbarino said. "The misinformation out there about this bill is so bad that I'm getting death threats."

New York is one of the places that desperately needs the spending. The subway is falling apart. Imagine being so blinkered by political hatred that you'd rather your representatives die than support a proposition by the "other side" even though it'd benefit you.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
New York is one of the places that desperately needs the spending. The subway is falling apart. Imagine being so blinkered by political hatred that you'd rather your representatives die than support a proposition by the "other side" even though it'd benefit you.


On paper they should be the most self sufficient state in the US, considering how many uber rich elites live there. A true left wing government as NY has should be swimming in tax dollars.

The uber rich elites of New York got a substantial tax cut in the not too distant past from an uber rich New York elitist. Maybe that didn't help.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
The uber rich elites of New York got a substantial tax cut in the not too distant past from an uber rich New York elitist. Maybe that didn't help.


Like Republicans?

Aren't they Democrat elites? Progressive even?

Pretty sure tax cuts don't discriminate between political affiliation.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Pretty sure tax cuts don't discriminate between political affiliation.


Fed level yeah.


Cities and states can tax like mad though. Why doesn't New York take their New York elites to pay for upkeep?

Dunno mate.

Dunno.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
A recent vote for President Biden's bipartisan infrastructure bill has developed into a controversial, life-threatening exercise for Representative Andrew Garbarino, a New York Republican who broke with his party to support the legislation.

Nassau Police confirmed that Kenneth Gasper was arrested and charged with aggravated harassment for a death threat he made to Garbarino, according to Detective Lieutenant Richard LeBrun.

"It's amazing people want to kill me over paving roads and clean water," Garbarino said. "The misinformation out there about this bill is so bad that I'm getting death threats."


Harassment and death threats is par for the course now from this cult. Even though that idiot making the threats would likely benefit from the bill he's fuming over and he probably doesn't even know exactly why he's mad, he was just told to be mad.

House passed it, now it's off to the Senate