Click HERE to see this thread with all of the graphics, features, and links.

Roids and being 33 whist looking 53 is enough to make Wayne Brady have to choke a *****.

i believe jonathan majors

Just the other day one of my favorite video game writers, Chris Avellone, had a sexual assault case against him dismissed with prejudice. Not only that but his accusers released a statement clearing Avellone of all wrong doing and were forced to pay him some 7 figure settlement fee. And yet, despite clearing being free of wrongdoing, it's too late for Avellone as his career and reputation have already been destroyed by these false accusations.

Essentially what I'm saying is we don't have nearly enough to say whether Majors is guilty or not. And it isn't for us to condemn a potentially innocent man. But if she does have wounds as reported, it doesn't sound good.

Knowing Disney these days they will remove him from the role, Instead of waiting for the truth to come as they should be doing.

Was it a variant?

Originally posted by Impediment
Was it a variant?
^^^

Been seeing alot of stupid posts on social media, Folks trying to put Jonathan Majors on the same level as Ezra Miller.

Probably vindictive DCEU fanboys trying to prove a point. "See? MCU has someone bad over there too!".

On that same token, if Johnathan played in a recent DC film, some Marvel fans would be as quick to throw him under the bus.

Ezra wouldn't be the first or last time someone at Hollywood got away with something awful, regardless.

Originally posted by Ridley_Prime
Probably vindictive DCEU fanboys trying to prove a point. "See? MCU has someone bad over there too!".


a flimsy point at that. Unlike Miller.. Jonathan Majors hasn't got a page full of incidents.

Originally posted by Kazenji
Been seeing alot of stupid posts on social media,

That can't be true. People on social media are all perfectly level-headed and not reactionary at all. They always gather and scrutinise the full facts before posting well thought out, substantive and objectively unbiased posts.

Originally posted by Kazenji
Knowing Disney these days they will remove him from the role, Instead of waiting for the truth to come as they should be doing.

Unlikely. This entire phase is built around his shitty version of Kang.

Haha MCU fans.

Originally posted by playa1258
Haha MCU fans.

Originally posted by Ridley_Prime
Probably vindictive DCEU fanboys trying to prove a point. "See? MCU has someone bad over there too!".

Was prolly trainin for Creed IV.

Stilt and DisneyWalker are racing to see who gets their brown eye poked by Majors first.

Jonathan Majors seems to be innocent from what has been said/shown.

Would be something to see his version of Kang time travel to ancient Egypt to try and adopt a young Apocalypse only for it to backfire like in the comics.. Imagine if that was how they brought Poccy into the MCU.

Originally posted by Psychotron
Unlikely. This entire phase is built around his shitty version of Kang.

Highly likely, Wouldn't be the first time Disney has done a kneejerk reaction to someone's incident and firing them before the truth is revealed.

Originally posted by Kazenji
Highly likely, Wouldn't be the first time Disney has done a kneejerk reaction to someone's incident and firing them before the truth is revealed.
^^^Thats what happened to Oswald.

If she has wounds and she's recanting her story, then something is definitely not right here.

Let the police investigate and see.

MCU will be fine, at worst they'll just recast Kang.

Of course. At least there will be that it worse comes to worst, but Barry Allen cannot and will not be recast because WB lacks the ethics/principles to do so.

Probably comes down to $$$ and the optics of firing a mentally ill person, which comes back to $$$.

https://www.worldofreel.com/blog/2023/11/13/5icpi9mo73d21z0rzl846bl5vjts9n

So I guess they couldnt recast Kang after all. I know initially giving Majors the benefit of a doubt aged poorly, but damn, Kang deserved better than to be moved on from prematurely, which put the MCU in an awkward position after all they had planned with him.

Edward Norton was a Hulk nut on top of that. More knowledgeable of the character and comic history than most people on the planet, and he made a lot of creative corrections to the 2008 film because of it. I just got the impression that Disney didnt like the idea of having someone that passionate about the character they play, so they replaced him with Mark Ruffalo. Norton was the perfect Banner/Hulk through and through though.

Can probably blame the lukewarm reception to the 2003 Hulk for the 2008 one not doing as well as it couldve. 2003 was a guilty pleasure standalone, but prolly shouldnt of happened for the betterment of Hulk in the long run.

Still, I wouldve thought theyd just recast Kang if nothing else. He deserves better than to be prematurely moved on from, but fair enough.

Well, either by luck or by design, they did leave themselves an out regarding Kang during the epilogue of the Loki S2 finale.

There's a scene at the end where TVA members are discussing Kang variants and references the one who got defeated in Quantumania but also remarks that none of the other Kangs are aware of the TVA and that they're essentially under control for the moment.

Originally posted by Ridley_Prime
Edward Norton was a Hulk nut on top of that. More knowledgeable of the character and comic history than most people on the planet, and he made a lot of creative corrections to the 2008 film because of it. I just got the impression that Disney didnt like the idea of having someone that passionate about the character they play, so they replaced him with Mark Ruffalo. Norton was the perfect Banner/Hulk through and through though.


Another person currently like that is Ms Marvel herself Iman Vellani, A while back she called out Kevin Fiege on the MCU's universe designation.

And the Russos, of course.

What's all this revisionist history regarding Edward Norton and The Incredible Hulk?

Norton was a major land for the role, but he's become the new Dustin Hoffman, the antagonistic method actor a-hole who can't work well with others. He basically got himself kicked out of the MCU with his un-team like behaviour, and his film was always just meh to begin with.

Originally posted by roughrider
What's all this revisionist history regarding Edward Norton and The Incredible Hulk?

Norton was a major land for the role, but he's become the new Dustin Hoffman, the antagonistic method actor a-hole who can't work well with others. He basically got himself kicked out of the MCU with his un-team like behaviour, and his film was always just meh to begin with.



Hell, let's be honest. Ang Lee's Hulk with Eric Bana was better.

Norton was bland as **** and is suffering from some serious delusions of grandeur.

I see. Can't say I'm surprised.

And 2008 film already had too many Banner scenes as it was.

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW


Hell, let's be honest. Ang Lee's Hulk with Eric Bana was better.

Norton was bland as **** and is suffering from some serious delusions of grandeur.
In a vacuum I did like 2003 Hulk better which I got lambasted by MCU fans for expressing before, particularly the villain who I found was more interesting than Abomination. Nick Nolte driving his son crazy was in a way amusing. Didnt stop me from giving credit where it was due though with Norton and his knowledge of Hulk, though didnt know about those other things with him, so eh, can see more now why he got fired. Delusions of grandeur indeed.

Apart from what I already said, also didnt help that 2008 Hulk came out the same year as The Dark Knight. Regardless of opinions on the Nolan films, Batman is a much bigger name than Hulk, so really didnt help.

It just wasn't a good movie to begin with, to be brutally honest.

I had no idea Norton was a fan. But being a fan of the character is not enough in some cases and it certainly wasn't enough in TIH.

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW


Hell, let's be honest. Ang Lee's Hulk with Eric Bana was better.

Norton was bland as **** and is suffering from some serious delusions of grandeur.

Edward Norton might have had the closest resemblance to Bruce Banner, but the Mark Ruffalo Hulk most closely resembles the comics Hulk. That's one way I differentiate them. The comics always cheat in this way, where Banner and Hulk have different faces and shapes of head. But the movies have always given Hulk the same face as the actor, which I think is better.

Originally posted by roughrider
Edward Norton might have had the closest resemblance to Bruce Banner, but the Mark Ruffalo Hulk most closely resembles the comics Hulk. That's one way I differentiate them. The comics always cheat in this way, where Banner and Hulk have different faces and shapes of head. But the movies have always given Hulk the same face as the actor, which I think is better.
^^^Nicely put. Upvote.

Lol...

...

Majors is a degenerate and a complete fool, he had easy millions in Marvel money coming his way for the next 5-10 years, now his whole career is over with.

No studio will sign him after Disney dropped his ass, except for maybe Ben Shaprio's crappy one.

Originally posted by Robtard
except for maybe Ben Shaprio's crappy one.

Oh yeah, The Daily Wire would LOVE to hire him if he's willing to shill and grift for the Right-Wing propaganda machine. Especially since he's black, like Candace Owens who grifts for them. They love that. I'm surprised they haven't hired Kanye West yet.. probably because he's too blunt with his racism. Goes far beyond the dog whistle.. heh

The good thing about the endless multiverse, they can recast Majors with any actor and explain the physical changes away, if they pick a non Black man.

Personalty, I'd just go with someone like Chiwetel Ejiofor, looks the part and is a better actor.

Originally posted by Robtard
Personalty, I'd just go with someone like Chiwetel Ejiofor, looks the part and is a better actor.

He's a killer actor!

Does he already have a Marvel role? 🤔

Baron Mordo in Dr Strange.

Highly recommend him in...

The Shadow Line
Z for Zachariah
Red Belt
Serenity

Get them watched

As for a replacement for Kang...seeing as neither got picked to replace Black Panther


Yahya Abdul-Mateen II
Sope Dirisu

https://i.ibb.co/qrMdS0t/411038980-748920050613811-4926376938530157795-n.jpg

Just move on from Kang. He's not interesting and he lost to freakin Ant-Man. He's not a threat. The argument is that even when you defeat one Kang (in the MCU), there is another one waiting in the wings... But that doesn't make him some big dangerous foe, it just makes him into a series of goons. That's not at all compelling. Plus Loki basically felt like it resolved that whole Kang storyline.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Baron Mordo in Dr Strange.

That's right. What a waste. That movie sucked.



Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Highly recommend him in...

The Shadow Line
Z for Zachariah
Red Belt
Serenity

Get them watched

I've seen two of the 4. Z and Serenity. Serenity is what I saw him in first and was super impressed ever since.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
He's a killer actor!

Does he already have a Marvel role? 🤔

Ah, shit, he does, as Jaden noted.

Originally posted by ares834
Just move on from Kang. He's not interesting and he lost to freakin Ant-Man. He's not a threat. The argument is that even when you defeat one Kang (in the MCU), there is another one waiting in the wings... But that doesn't make him some big dangerous foe, it just makes him into a series of goons. That's not at all compelling. Plus Loki basically felt like it resolved that whole Kang storyline.

I woudn't mind and Majors getting axed would be an easy out, but I think they've already built the storylines around Kang as is.


Galactus would be the proper threat level after Thanos.

I mean, it might work out for the best for Marvel, because he wasn't very good anyway, so maybe they'll come up with something better.

You know, necessity is the mother of invention...

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
That's right. What a waste. That movie sucked.





I've seen two of the 4. Z and Serenity. Serenity is what I saw him in first and was super impressed ever since.

And then he came back for Dr Strange 2, Even tho it was different Mordo from another universe.

.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
.
^^^Pitch perfect casting.

It might be racist.. I don't know, I'm not sure. 🤔

Ok, good, so it's okay that I laughed.

Never go full wife-beater.

Peter Mensah would also be good for a Kang replacement.

Or just cast a white guy

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
Or just cast a white guy

Even better, Make it comic accurate

but Disney wants diversity in the MCU universe.

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
https://i.ibb.co/qrMdS0t/411038980-748920050613811-4926376938530157795-n.jpg
They waited as long as possible to pull the plug on Majors; after his case was over in hopes he was innocent or something, but Disney pulled the plug on Johnny Depp as Jack Sparrow and whatnot long before the verdict with his case was reached. smh

They'd have been called racist if they hadn't waited.

Originally posted by Ridley_Prime
They waited as long as possible to pull the plug on Majors; after his case was over in hopes he was innocent or something, but Disney pulled the plug on Johnny Depp as Jack Sparrow and whatnot long before the verdict with his case was reached. smh Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
They'd have been called racist if they hadn't waited.

Ah yes, reversing the racism. I love how far we've come as a society!