The version of the Hulk that I'm referring to, is the new one, of course, as the 2003 version would completely thrash the Thing. Now, as we all know, the new Hulk was underpowered a little bit, but still displayed some impressive feats, as did the Thing.
Who would you guys say emerges as the winner?
__________________ "Major, a great writer once said; "There are clefts in the rock where we see the back part of God and tremble." There's no training for what you saw out there because it's not an enemy that confronts us. It's a new power, let loose through a crack in the cliff of nature's mystery."
So, do you think that Thing would be able to get in any damage at all?
Personally, I think he could get in some good hits that could stun Hulk for a minute or knock him back, but this version of the Thing seems incredibly (no pun intended) slow, so even if he got in some good hits, it wouldn't be a lot of hits.
Hulk would indeed smash.
__________________ "Major, a great writer once said; "There are clefts in the rock where we see the back part of God and tremble." There's no training for what you saw out there because it's not an enemy that confronts us. It's a new power, let loose through a crack in the cliff of nature's mystery."
I don't watch the Fantastic Four films a lot, but all I can remember are that he was able to stop a pick up truck dead in his tracks with his shoulder, bullets bounced off his rocky hide, and Doom's electricity didn't seem to hurt him too much. Other than that, I don't really remember anything regarding durability.
__________________ "Major, a great writer once said; "There are clefts in the rock where we see the back part of God and tremble." There's no training for what you saw out there because it's not an enemy that confronts us. It's a new power, let loose through a crack in the cliff of nature's mystery."
Funny how no one ever recalls anything from F4 II, must be because it was so crap. But still, there should be some feats that can be used from that.
Unrelated, but the Surfer does actually have some usable feats from that film. If only he had some strength feats, then a SS vs Supes topic would be interesting.
There are some strength feats, but the Hulk did greater overall. They're both durable, so it'd be a slug-fest, yet the Hulk does have the strength boost. So it stands to reason that in a prolonged fight, which this would most likely be, since neither is getting KO'd early, the Hulk would have the advantage.
Anyway, the Thing lifted up that ferris wheel in the second FF movie, which was a pretty decent feat, but nothing the Hulk couldn't do.
__________________ "Major, a great writer once said; "There are clefts in the rock where we see the back part of God and tremble." There's no training for what you saw out there because it's not an enemy that confronts us. It's a new power, let loose through a crack in the cliff of nature's mystery."
True, WD, you should really do the right thing and give yourself a 3-day ban. Look at it this way, you'll have 36 wonderful hours to play with your dolls.
Do us all a favor and stop juicing Superman's nuts. Like seriously, every word out of you is Superman. I know you're a Mod and all, but it's really annoying, and I know you're not joking. Everyone knows the Thing will eventually lose because of the Hulk's ability to grow stronger as he gets angrier. How about you do us a favor and stop being a Superman fanboy?
__________________ "Major, a great writer once said; "There are clefts in the rock where we see the back part of God and tremble." There's no training for what you saw out there because it's not an enemy that confronts us. It's a new power, let loose through a crack in the cliff of nature's mystery."
KMC Community Forums
Oct 31st, 2008 03:02 AM
