Battlezone is about which is more powerful a punch from movie Juggernaut or a Charged Hammer shot from MCU Thor.
Is anyone interested in being a judge?
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
Thanks guys, I'm ready to go now so whenever Josh says he's ready we can do this.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
46 second mark, A charged hammer strike levels a large area in Jotunheim
3:22 mark, The shockwave from a chared hammer strike levels multiple trees
7:54 mark, Shockwave from a charged hammer strike destroys a tank.
9:03 mark Charged hammer shot in Sokovia
Now, to be as fair as possible. let's say The charged hammer strikes in Sokovia and Jotunheim are only responsible for 1% of the damage. lets now take a look at Juggernauts punches.
49 second mark. doesn't even ko Wolverine. a guy who at this point in the movies was getting ko'd by bullets to the head and being hit by a tree swung by Sabretooth. which btw, only sent Wolverine flying a short distance. something Captain America has done to armored soliders with just regular punches.
Same deal, doesn't send Wolverine flying or ko him.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
Not in the scene where Thor impacted Cap's shield.
So the feat ain't a charged hammer. I thought i was, and was refering to that scene in the Wolverine vs Killmonger thread. Now that i rewatch it is clear that it was just a normal hammer strike.
So, i guess it's useless to argue Juggernaut's power vs Charged hammer.
Yes, it was. the vid clearly shows lightning involved in all 4 of the scenes I provided a timestamp for.
However since you are trying to refute my evidence, that means the BZ has been started. it's now up to the judges.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
Last edited by Silent Master on Feb 19th, 2018 at 09:10 PM
The only reason am replying to this post is to clarify why i didn't accepted SilentMaster's challenge. Also because I have challenged quanchi to a BZ and now he is using this to try run (You know how pathetic he is)
Reasons why i rejected SM's BZ challenge:
1. Subject debated isn't valid:
- The original statement was whether Juggernaut's punch could be compared with charged Mjolnir impact. However, the scene being debated between me and SilentMaster didn't contain/depicted a charged Mjolnir impact! Therefore, the parameters of this BZ was irrelevant.
2. Character limitations:
- By that time, Juggernaut only had 1 movie depiction. X-Men 3. There were too many character limitations for him. There were limited evidence to support the case, and most of it would have relied on speculations and limited movie portrayal. Clearly not a subject for a BZ, reason why i told SM to remain in the MVF.
3. Personal issues:
- At the time I was alien to this forum (Didn't know the rules/guidelines and forum format). I also had limited time.
Having said this, thread closed.
After reading this thread's guidelines, informing myself on the format of this thread. Having plenty of time and choosing a more appropiate thread topic, I challenge quanchi.
KMC Community Forums
Feb 19th, 2018 04:10 AM
