Zeal Ex Nihilo
Restricted
Gender: Male Location:
Account Restricted
Wikipedia's standards fall yet again...
quote: In Part II, Sasuke sees little change from his personality and mindset at the end of Part I, still craving power above all else. His lust for strength is such that, during his reunion with Naruto and Sakura, he claims to be willing to give his body to Orochimaru if it means killing Itachi. Sasuke has at least changed to a point that he no longer cares for his former teammates' well-beings, being more than willing to kill them since neither is of any use to him. His relationship with Orochimaru shows a similar lack of loyalty, as during their time together he applies no honorifics to Orochimaru's name, is somewhat rude to him, and does not express his allegiance with Otogakure by wearing a Sound headband. Of the loyalties Sasuke has, the only one he displays is that of the Uchiha clan, the symbol of which he wears on his back collar. Despite this lack of allegiances to those close to him, Sasuke seems to be unable to bring himself to needlessly harm those he has never met before, and makes it a point to prevent their deaths when possible. He's also known for being the most gayest character in Naruto. Commonly called Naruto-sexual.
Lulz.
__________________
Ask me about my "obvious and unpleasant agenda of hatred."
Oct 7th, 2007 04:15 AM
Impediment
Endless
Gender: Male Location: The Dreaming
Moderator
Boo-fu*king-hoo.
Write a letter to Oprah. I don't give a shit.
__________________
“Dreams shape the world."
Oct 7th, 2007 04:20 AM
AngryManatee
Sexy Ham Manwich
Gender: Male Location: Austin, TX
Then again it could be argued that every character in Naruto, and the people who watch it, are chronic little-boy-pee-pee-touchers
__________________
You don't need good rear vision because you're always in front!
Oct 7th, 2007 05:11 AM
Schecter
Restricted
Gender: Unspecified Location: **** you
Account Restricted
this passage should be saved for anyone who quotes wikipedia as indisputable proof of anything.
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Impediment
Boo-fu*king-hoo.
Write a letter to Oprah. I don't give a shit.
funny that you posted...considering you dont give a shit. well...actually its not funny, but.....yeah....*leaves avoiding eye contact*
__________________
"Sell crazy someplace else. We're all stocked up here."
Oct 7th, 2007 07:11 AM
BlackC@
Confront the darkness
Gender: Unspecified Location:
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Impediment
Boo-fu*king-hoo.
Write a letter to Oprah. I don't give a shit.
That had me in stitches!
Oct 7th, 2007 09:58 AM
It's xyz!
Restricted
Gender: Male Location: Made you look
Account Restricted
I liked the Impediment quote too. He's always good at making quotes to live by.
Anyway, Wikipedia is wrong because it contridicts itself, not because it doesn't know some shit about a retarded anime.
__________________
Bulbasaur, the original... Pepe.
Last edited by Raz on Jan 1st 2000 at 00:00AM
Oct 7th, 2007 10:10 AM
Alpha Centauri
Restricted
Gender: Unspecified Location: Ground Zero.
Account Restricted
Wikipedia is just unreliable because it's able to be edited. It doesn't necessarily mean people put false info up there.
Though I agree using it as a source is usually a bit silly.
-AC
__________________
Oct 7th, 2007 10:25 AM
It's xyz!
Restricted
Gender: Male Location: Made you look
Account Restricted
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Wikipedia is just unreliable because it's able to be edited. It doesn't necessarily mean people put false info up there.
Though I agree using it as a source is usually a bit silly.
-AC
No, it's unreliable because any idiot could have posted it. An Australian could be the one who wrote the article on the American civil war. (Don't bother mentioning Kram3r.)
__________________
Bulbasaur, the original... Pepe.
Last edited by Raz on Jan 1st 2000 at 00:00AM
Oct 7th, 2007 10:30 AM
Alpha Centauri
Restricted
Gender: Unspecified Location: Ground Zero.
Account Restricted
That is essentially what I said.
It's unreliable cos anyone can do it, it doesn't mean someone who DID, is wrong.
-AC
__________________
Oct 7th, 2007 10:32 AM
Ushgarak
Paladin
Gender: Male Location: Chelmsford, Essex, UK
Co-Admin
It doesn't matter. Even if Wikipeida was only ever edited by responsible people in the know it's still no good as an academic source; no encyclopeida is.
__________________
"We've got maybe seconds before Darth Rosenberg grinds everybody into Jawa burgers and not one of you buds has the midi-chlorians to stop her!"
"You've never had any TINY bit of sex, have you?"
BtVS
Oct 7th, 2007 10:34 AM
It's xyz!
Restricted
Gender: Male Location: Made you look
Account Restricted
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
That is essentially what I said.
It's unreliable cos anyone can do it, it doesn't mean someone who DID, is wrong.
-AC
You said it's unreliable because it gets edited. I said it's unreliable because it could have been posted by an idiot. There is a difference between the two statements.
__________________
Bulbasaur, the original... Pepe.
Last edited by Raz on Jan 1st 2000 at 00:00AM
Oct 7th, 2007 10:37 AM
Bardock42
Junior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: With Cinderella and the 9 Dwarves
Bad postquote: (post ) Originally posted by lord xyz
I liked the Impediment quote too. He's always good at making quotes to live by.
Anyway, Wikipedia is wrong because it contridicts itself, not because it doesn't know some shit about a retarded anime.
Good postquote: (post ) Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Wikipedia is just unreliable because it's able to be edited. It doesn't necessarily mean people put false info up there.
Though I agree using it as a source is usually a bit silly.
-AC
__________________
Oct 7th, 2007 10:37 AM
It's xyz!
Restricted
Gender: Male Location: Made you look
Account Restricted
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Bardock42
Bad post
Good post
Aww, you like Naruto.
__________________
Bulbasaur, the original... Pepe.
Last edited by Raz on Jan 1st 2000 at 00:00AM
Oct 7th, 2007 10:51 AM
Bardock42
Junior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: With Cinderella and the 9 Dwarves
quote: (post ) Originally posted by lord xyz
Aww, you like Naruto.
It's a good show.
I was just more referring to your post being trivial nonsense and his actually stating a problem with Wikipedia.
But good show.
__________________
Oct 7th, 2007 10:54 AM
It's xyz!
Restricted
Gender: Male Location: Made you look
Account Restricted
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Bardock42
It's a good show.
I was just more referring to your post being trivial nonsense and his actually stating a problem with Wikipedia.
But good show.
Wikipedia does contradict itself. Something that contradicts itself is a problem, yes?
__________________
Bulbasaur, the original... Pepe.
Last edited by Raz on Jan 1st 2000 at 00:00AM
Oct 7th, 2007 10:57 AM
Bardock42
Junior Member
Gender: Unspecified Location: With Cinderella and the 9 Dwarves
quote: (post ) Originally posted by lord xyz
Wikipedia does contradict itself. Something that contradicts itself is a problem, yes?
You said "Wikipedia is wrong because it contradicts itself"
That's an immensely stupid thing to say.
Because if it contradicts itself wouldn't one side of the contradictions be likely right?
It might be an unreliable source because it contradicts itself (it doesn't always btw), but you do see that it can and is correct in many cases.
__________________
Oct 7th, 2007 11:01 AM
It's xyz!
Restricted
Gender: Male Location: Made you look
Account Restricted
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Bardock42
You said "Wikipedia is wrong because it contradicts itself"
Replace wrong with unreliable. Since you don't understand what I meant by wrong.
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Bardock42
That's an immensely stupid thing to say.
Depends what I mean by wrong, obviously.
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Bardock42
Because if it contradicts itself wouldn't one side of the contradictions be likely right?
Well, no. 2 + 2 = 5. 2 + 2 = 1. Both are contradictions, both are wrong.
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Bardock42
It might be an unreliable source because it contradicts itself (it doesn't always btw), but you do see that it can and is correct in many cases.
I don't understand what you're trying to say here.
__________________
Bulbasaur, the original... Pepe.
Last edited by Raz on Jan 1st 2000 at 00:00AM
Oct 7th, 2007 11:17 AM
Alpha Centauri
Restricted
Gender: Unspecified Location: Ground Zero.
Account Restricted
Why do people feel they can say one entirely different word to another and then act like they meant the other?
-AC
__________________
Oct 7th, 2007 11:26 AM
It's xyz!
Restricted
Gender: Male Location: Made you look
Account Restricted
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Why do people feel they can say one entirely different word to another and then act like they meant the other?
-AC
I said wrong as in not good. Unreliable is a better word, however, and I should have used it.
__________________
Bulbasaur, the original... Pepe.
Last edited by Raz on Jan 1st 2000 at 00:00AM
Oct 7th, 2007 11:29 AM
Kram3r
Senior Member
Gender: Male Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
quote: (post ) Originally posted by lord xyz
No, it's unreliable because any idiot could have posted it. An Australian could be the one who wrote the article on the American civil war. (Don't bother mentioning Kram3r.)
That wouldn't mean it's unreliable. I know a lot of information about the American Civil War as I studied it in Modern History. I could also back it up as well. It's not reliable because, as mentioned above, and you have stated, any one can edit it.
Oct 7th, 2007 11:35 AM
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
Text-only version