Lol, I like that "f*ck the time!" and "f*ck the rules" basically. Once they decide something is white privilege you best let them act any way they want..lest they decide to call you racist.
If these kids can't follow the rules..get rid of them. I'm sure they'd cry white privilege and all that, but oh well.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
actually, they aren't that creative. More the standard "no uterus, no opinion" and "mansplaining" and I'm just sitting there wanting to say "no business, no opinion" but that's probably hate speech.
Gender: Unspecified Location: With Cinderella and the 9 Dwarves
Obviously long pigs source is a biased hack-job, but the linked piece in The Atlantic is actually fascinating. Illuminating both sides of the discussion.
Found this interesting, I does sound like part of the reason why this change is not that well liked is because it gives other, smaller, not-tradittionally successful outfits a chance to compete better. At any rate it's a more complicated topic than the initial post makes it seem.
Were they or were they not told to debate a certain topic and then just decided "nope, I'm gonna talk about something else" ? Did they or did they not violate numerous rules in these debates and yet still somehow get awarded victory?
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Gender: Unspecified Location: With Cinderella and the 9 Dwarves
You can just read the article. Apparently they used the premise as a jumping off point for a meta-debate. The article references the "**** the time" incident, but doesn't go into details either.
Maybe in the LGBT/european community Meta debate is saying "I ain't gotsta follow no cracks ass rules you racist honkey!", but here its just ignorant thugs talking jive.
lol, sounds like the kind of debating tactics that, when used on the arguments we have on this website, usually get dismissed by the more academically oriented posters.
but i'm sure it's different when it happens on a mostly white campus in person and the speakers are charismatic and non-white.
The article also said that doing such things were a violation of the rules.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Gender: Unspecified Location: With Cinderella and the 9 Dwarves
I believe the Atlantic article does not state that. Rather it talks about how their are different interpretations of the rules, and apparently the organisations and judges seem to favour the new style vs. the traditional style. Sadly neither sides argument is very well made in the article, I think, so I'm still unsure about a lot of the points. Ostensibly I think there should be a place for traditional style debates, however it does have the risk of being exclusionary.
I just watched a two time national debate champs argue that the rules were made for white men and therefore they don't need to follow them. They went on to say black women built America, basically twerked on stave and rap battled each other while screaming racist remarks.
So there is an interpretation of the rule that allows for one to begin a "meta" debate?
I also can't help but wonder how people would react is white people had been going around and turning debates into debates about the problems within the black community and such.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.