People will cling to the fact the court is saying they merely assume these things, but it is still a pretty big deal when they say stuff like:
“The Court thus assumes that the DNC and Wasserman Schultz preferred Hillary Clinton as the Democratic candidate for president over Bernie Sanders or any other Democratic candidate. It assumes that they stockpiled information useful to the Clinton campaign. It assumes that they devoted their resources to assist Clinton in securing the party’s nomination and opposing other Democratic candidates. And it assumes that they engaged in these surreptitious acts while publically proclaiming they were completely neutral, fair, and impartial. This Order therefore concerns only technical matters of pleading and subject-matter jurisdiction.”
Damn lol.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Considering I've said something like '**** the DNC for what they did to Bernie' back when Clinton won the nom and you responded to that, not sure why you're asking now.
But I was referring to Surtur's double-standard of "assumed" information. Going forward I hope he takes it all as truth, as he does here.
You telling others to be consistent....lol. Too funny.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Aw look its one of those tryhards that think Bernie waa treated fairly. Adam I forgot you were pretty much the only die hard Hillary voter here. How much this must suck for you
Word is Debbie is awfully paranoid these days. Running from reporters, etc.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
The Court thus assumes that the DNC and Wasserman Schultz preferred Hillary Clinton as the Democratic candidate for president over Bernie Sanders or any other Democratic candidate. It assumes that they stockpiled information useful to the Clinton campaign. It assumes that they devoted their resources to assist Clinton in securing the party’s nomination and opposing other Democratic candidates. And it assumes that they engaged in these surreptitious acts while publically proclaiming they were completely neutral, fair, and impartial. This Order therefore concerns only technical matters of pleading and subject-matter jurisdiction.”
But please? Keep playing word games to try and circumvent the truth it was rigged.