"The sources said the investigation into Podesta and his company began as more of a fact-finding mission about the ECMU and Manafort's role in the campaign, but has now morphed into a criminal inquiry into whether the firm violated the Foreign Agents Registration Act, known as FARA."
Weird. A non-story probably. On the other hand for certain folk it's certainly not a non-story whenever Mueller acts on some shit. Nice.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Last edited by Surtur on Oct 24th, 2017 at 01:24 AM
Re: Mueller Now Investigating Democratic Lobbyist Tony Podesta
for months you've been trying to discredit mueller and the investigation as it concerned the trump administration.
as usual you will see no deflective cucking from the left, as you have demonstrated consistently. keep tryharding while not recognising your own clownish hypocrisy.
#ohsquirt
__________________
Your Lord knows very well what is in your heart. Your soul suffices this day as a reckoner against you. I need no witnesses. You do not listen to your soul, but listen instead to your anger and your rage.
Re: Re: Mueller Now Investigating Democratic Lobbyist Tony Podesta
how you doing buddy? I just saw blade runner 2049
__________________ QUANCHI112:In between the passes Khan will tear out the orca teeth and use them as an offensive weapon. Khan has crushed a skull before so tearing a tooth off a whale should be no issue.
Your Lord knows very well what is in your heart. Your soul suffices this day as a reckoner against you. I need no witnesses. You do not listen to your soul, but listen instead to your anger and your rage.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
but as i already stated, i support mueller's investigation and trust his integrity. now.what?
__________________
Your Lord knows very well what is in your heart. Your soul suffices this day as a reckoner against you. I need no witnesses. You do not listen to your soul, but listen instead to your anger and your rage.
You deflected, whined about other shit. Too funny. What a dipstick.
For me this is awesome either way. Either we denounce Mueller and all he has done, or we acknowledge the importance of shit he looks into, all the shit.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
i just directly addressed the topic with finality, you posturing boy.
__________________
Your Lord knows very well what is in your heart. Your soul suffices this day as a reckoner against you. I need no witnesses. You do not listen to your soul, but listen instead to your anger and your rage.
You whined like a dipshit too though. You whined in order to try to make this topic about your whining. Your pals will come in and pounce on it, it'll be funny.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Your Lord knows very well what is in your heart. Your soul suffices this day as a reckoner against you. I need no witnesses. You do not listen to your soul, but listen instead to your anger and your rage.
So Mueller: to be taken seriously or no? To be fair, if the Uranium One thing turns out true I'll come say this is bullshit.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Your Lord knows very well what is in your heart. Your soul suffices this day as a reckoner against you. I need no witnesses. You do not listen to your soul, but listen instead to your anger and your rage.
But we can be real: for months dipshits here presented this f*ckhead as a revenant. Well, is he revenant'ing now?
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
I'm not even sure at this point what variety of strawman you're trying to make of me. you're just ridiculous.
__________________
Your Lord knows very well what is in your heart. Your soul suffices this day as a reckoner against you. I need no witnesses. You do not listen to your soul, but listen instead to your anger and your rage.
How much MSM coverage do you feel this will get? More or less than Trump getting an extra ice cream scoop?
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
After he deflected lol. Do you deny his first post was a deflection? We can move on as soon as you say it was, since you felt the need to weigh in. People who constantly whine about deflections need theirs noted, I'd say.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Last edited by Surtur on Oct 24th, 2017 at 05:08 AM
He directly responded to one thing and ignored the main topic. The main "point" as you'd say.
That's a deflection. Are you sadly going to continue to defend this? Since when you ignore the main point and focus on something that wasn't the main point in order to talk shit, that's a deflection.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
When I first read your post, I also interpreted the "on the other hand for certain folk..."to be your main point. Furthermore you weren't very specific in your op about what you wanted the discussion to be about. There's a wide range of possible points or comments one can make in relation to an article you post.
There's a difference between saying something about a genral topic and responding to a direct point.
When you asked Bashar a specific question, he directly responded to you. Granted, while he was answering, he also did "talk sh!t", but that's different from ignoring your point which would imply he didn't respond to what you were saying when he definitely did:
In the same post as he "talked sh!t", he also answered your question. The concepts are not mutually exclusive.
KMC Community Forums
Oct 24th, 2017 01:21 AM
