I mean, using the word "let" surely doesn't imply consent. Right?
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
he assumed consent based on his power, or else he would certainly not just start kissing a stranger and grabbing her by the pussy, unless some communication was made. to excuse that means we may as well let al frankin off the hook.
__________________ Your Lord knows very well what is in your heart. Your soul suffices this day as a reckoner against you. I need no witnesses. You do not listen to your soul, but listen instead to your anger and your rage.
Or...they f*cked him because he was rich and famous.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Or did a woman throw herself at him, based on his power? The warped idea that you yourself, Robtard and a couple of other social marxists seem to have is that women lack any sort of agency when it comes to choosing their sexual partners. That they can't actively decide themselves when they want to have sex, and that it's always the men aggressively pursuing them.
Here's an uncomfortable truth. Women often seek out mates based on power, monetary status and of course, the charisma that can win oner the hearts of voting americans (california doesn't count).
Ah, I see. So you have an exact account off the exchange yourself to be making such assumptions. Please do share it with us.
If we're going to compare consensual sex acts to groping unconscious women then sure.
are men supposed to assume women are children and can't protest or speak their minds? or are we supposed to assume they are adults and treat them equally?
__________________ QUANCHI112:In between the passes Khan will tear out the orca teeth and use them as an offensive weapon. Khan has crushed a skull before so tearing a tooth off a whale should be no issue.
Also, affirmative consent is not actually a law Bashar teg. Meaning that a woman (or man) does not have to say, "yes, this is Ok" to any sexual act before engaging in it. Such desires can of course be inferred by body language, with a verbal "No" being the line that crosses the barrier of safe and consensual sex into rape and sexual assault. Can you show me where the pussy grab girl ever said to "No" to Trumps advances?
Shitlord Weinstein stands by his claims that all the sex-play was with consent. So why different rules for Trump when Trumpers want Weinstein skewered?
Jessica Leeds is one of several women who accused Trump of grabbing her without consent during election time, it was brushed aside.
Spoiler alert: a guy asked her if he could not wear a condom and she said yes. LMAO. Stealthy!
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Neat, and I expect a woman to not whine about it later if a dude asks her if he can not wear one and she flat out says yes.
As a reasonable human being, you also agree that shit shouldn't be whined about...right?
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Jessica leeds had ties to the clinton campaign. Not really a reliable source considering the convenient timing of her accusation. And that literally no one had accused Trump previously until his opponent was Clinton.
Not that any of this is relevant. I'm asking you why the pussy grab comment was indeed Trump "bragging about rape". The women in question of course, never accused Trump of sexual assault, even after all the false accusations levied at him to try and swing the election in his opponents favour.
yeah they probably all did. the accusers should be ignored because they probably did too. brilliant show of hypocrisy m8.
__________________ Your Lord knows very well what is in your heart. Your soul suffices this day as a reckoner against you. I need no witnesses. You do not listen to your soul, but listen instead to your anger and your rage.
They should be ignored for several reasons. Trumps political enemies couldn't produce any credible stiffed contractors or sexual assault victims, All they have are allegations with no backbone and some evidence he talks like a locker room bro and says mean things that are true.
And here's the other thing. The Wikileaks Dump showed that the DNC were willing to try an dlevi Rape accusations agains their opponents if need be. You might want to look at some of their emails. Is it any coincidence that Jessica leeds, a DNC conspirator, accused trump on the last leg of the election, despite being "assaulted" 30 years prior.
So yeah, pretty much any unfounded accusation against can be ignored and disregarded.
Are you even capable of rational debate. I ask a simple question, why do you think the pussy grab scenario was sexual assault. All you seem to show with your response is that you don't like Trump very much.
^^brilliant mound of hypocritical dogshit you made there m8
__________________ Your Lord knows very well what is in your heart. Your soul suffices this day as a reckoner against you. I need no witnesses. You do not listen to your soul, but listen instead to your anger and your rage.
Yeah, deflections, like not being able to answer why the oussy grab comment was sexual assault and instead talking about people complaining about Weinstein and how it's unfair not to immediately label Trump a rapist without proof.
Not that this will work with me, given that I haven't made a single comment on Weinstein my entire time here.
So again, do you have any legitimate reason to believe that this interaction between Trump and the pussy grabbed was rape, other than your own dislike for the Donald?