There's a huge difference between wanting offer people asylum in your country and having people on your own property. I don't even want my neighbors snooping over the fence.
The whole "Why don't you take them into your own home and support them, then?" argument is dumb as ****.
I'm no fan of Nancy Pelosi, either.
__________________
Last edited by Eternal Idol on Jan 15th, 2019 at 07:07 PM
There’s also a huge difference between offering asylums and outright illegals though.
You also reliaze, the country your seeking asylum from have no obligations to take you in if they don’t feel like it right?
I also think Trump should capitalize on the illegals though. He should make Congress pass a law that says, if you’re been here for 5+yrs, and you can prove it, you’re allowed to start your legal status in this country. After that 5 yrs are up, if caught you will be deported. The only ones excluded are the ones with criminal backgrounds. Be in their country, or their home county.
Pelosi could have easily said, "Bring me the rest of the families. I'll ask my Democratic voter-base to offer housing, jobs, SSNs, and a path to legality. Because that's what the Democratic party is about. Here is $10,000 to a fund to get the ball rolling for these people and their families. I'll work hard in congress to correct our broken immigration system while the good Americans try to take care of these families, legally, and with compassion."
Disagreed, this makes Trumpers destroy a point they created and nobody cares that Pelosi lives in a gated community. Well, nobody besides Trumpers who obsess over that failed point.
Gender: Male Location: The Proud Nation of Kekistan
Mixed feelings about this. On one hand I cringed a decent amount because someone from my side doing that isn't the best way to spread a message, but on the other hand the caricature she did while trolling... hilarious as ****.
__________________
Shadilay my brothers and sisters. With any luck we will throw off the shackles of normie oppression. We have nothing to lose but our chains! Praise Kek!
THE MOTTO IS "IN KEK WE TRUST"
The law authorized a fence along about 700 miles of the border between the U.S.-Mexico border. By 2015, U.S. Customs and Border Protection had constructed 654 miles of fencing, the Government Accountability Office reported.
The fence was different from the wall Trump promised to build on the campaign trail, which he said would be made of "hardened concrete" as tall as "95 stories" with a "very big, very beautiful door."
Trump derided the 2006 fence as too modest during the 2016 campaign — he said it was "not a wall" but a "little fence" that could be scaled with a ladder.
"Now we got lucky because it was such a little wall, it was such a nothing wall, no, they couldn't get their environmental — probably a snake was in the way or a toad," Trump said. (Actually, the project didn’t face environmental hurdles; we rated that part of the claim Mostly False.) -snip
he Democrats’ offer to Trump is a continuing resolution on last year’s appropriations act, which provided $1.3 billion for fencing and additional money for other types of border security. The language made it so that the funds could only be used on repairing or extending fencing that had already been built under the 2006 law.
We’re rated similar statements in which the Trump administration has claimed Democrats wanted a wall as Half True, but here, Trump goes farther. Democrats have not changed their stance on the border fencing they previously supported; they simply don’t support the more ambitious wall Trump proposes.
Finally, Trump says the Democrats no longer support their previous position simply because he wants it. But Democrats have actually proposed current funding for the fencing that was approved in 2006.