I know we have probably heard them all but just in case there are some that I don't know I've started this thread.
One theory that I heard only recently was that the glowing inside the briefcase that Jules and Vincent take from Frank Whally was in fact the loot from the Reservoir Dogs heist. Although I prefer the religious theory behind it all.
The briefcase actually contains the soul of Marcellus Wallace, (which could explain the plaster on the back of his neck) the glowing is his soul, that's why we see a glowing light when they shoot Frank Whalley, that is his soul leaving his body.
The combination for the briefcase is 666, the same as Wallace's burglar alarm. This might mean that he is the devil but I heard that Mr Wolf is the devil, which would make Butch's cabbie the devil also.(Mr Wolf's license plate is the same as the number on Butch's cab drivers taxi license.
And don't forget the Red Apples. Anyone know any more theories?
__________________ Then lets head down into that cellar and carve ourselves a witch
It really doesn't do any good to hypothosize about the subject. There is no right answer, and never will be. Tarantino himself doesn't even know what was in the briefcase..........he just wrote it to be something valuable. Money, gold, drugs,......whatever you want to be in the briefcase, whatever you think makes the story better.....that is what is in it.
He's stated a million times over the past 10 years "Nothing specific was in the briefcase, I used a golden light to represent that whatever was inside was something valuable"..............
samhain>The briefcase actually contains the soul of Marcellus Wallace, (which could explain the plaster on the back of his neck) the glowing is his soul, that's why we see a glowing light when they shoot Frank Whalley, that is his soul leaving his body.
the plaster was there because ving rhames had a big spot or scar on his neck which would distract the viewers. it was decided a plaster would cover it up.
Mook -
I know he had a scar and that was the reason for it. Its just like the briefcase where it doesn't show inside. However, it is still used to create the idea that its hiding something for the movie. There is no real reason to hide the scar and if it was important, they would use make-up.
__________________
Greg Oden: The future of the Blazers. The future of the NBA.
no...........it does not. This is all ridiculous. The movie was written by Quentin Tarantino. Quentin Tarantino has said, "nothing specific was in the briefcase. It was something valuable....but nothing specific"..........why speculate that a soul is in the case, when the man who wrote the story has already said that is wrong? Furthermore.....why quote idiotic theories on the internet which claim something is written in the bible that is not in the bible?
I was actually asking IF it was in the bible. Not saying that it was .
And the whole reason I started the thread was to see if there were any other theories knocking around.
__________________ Then lets head down into that cellar and carve ourselves a witch
no offense meant samhain..............that theory has been kicking around the internet since atleast '96. It is just so ridiculous. The person who originally made up the theory used to say there was some place in the bible that said a person's soul is removed from the back of the neck. I just figured you had read and believed that nonsense somewhere on the web. Ofcourse it is false........nowhere in the bible does it speak of any place on the human body a "soul is removed" from....be it neck, head, big toe, or right arm.
No offense taken. The reason I didn't include the bible/soul-removal thing in my first post was because I was dubious about it being true myself. However I do think that QT has at least a little idea about what may be in the case, I don't think he could write the script without having something in his mind.
__________________ Then lets head down into that cellar and carve ourselves a witch
It's a plot device. It's not important what was in the briefcase so he didn't write anything to be in it. All that was important is that they wanted it......which meant it was valuable. The only reason the briefcase is in the film is to carry the Jules/Vincent story from one scene to the next. It has no importance.
He probably did have something in his mind before he wrote the movie..........just never wrote it down. He probably figured it would take away from the actual plot of the film (the characters moving from one situation to the next) if he actually included what the valuable item in the briefcase was.
KMC Community Forums
Jan 31st, 2004 09:22 PM
