ah who really cares, no one takes presidence on this except for the people being nominated. We all know the best movies and greatest directors regaurdless of the winner.Indiana jones. Rocky, RAMBO, Die HArd, Lethal weapon, and Aliens should have owned them all. that there is my happy ending
__________________ "If you tell the truth, you never have to remember anything" -Twain
(sig by Scythe)
well thats YOUR opinion....I remember very clearly sitting there watching the Oscars and being VERY pissed that the piece of crap Shakesphere in Love beat Saving Private Ryan as best movie.
I remember thinking that Sam Jackson (for "Pulp Fiction") was robbed when Martin Landau won for "Ed Wood" in 1995, but I also thought that making Jackson a "suporting" nominee and Travolta a "leading" nominee was just as big an injustice. It's been nearly a decade, and I'm almost over it now.
__________________ Evelle: "Balloons! Hey, these blow up into funny shapes 'n' all?"
Grocer: "Well, no...unless round is funny."
Do The Right Thing not even being nominated for an oscar which is the biggest ripoff ever.
Also probably a lot of people will disagree, but in my opinion JFK should of won best picture instead of Silence of the Lambs which was a great movie but their are few movies if any that I have seen that is better than JFK.
Also isnt it interesting that the two movies ive mentioned were controversial films and didnt win.
__________________
“As flies to wanton boys are we to the gods, they kill us for their sport.”
Last edited by Dr. Strangelove on Aug 16th, 2004 at 12:43 AM
Now see I think Gladiator was dead on with that win, but I very much agree that Shawshank should have beat Forrest Gump which is a movie I never really much cared for myself. And I agree with Two Towers over Chicago..........but the big deal was the revival of the musical I guess.
Gladiator was a poor rip off of Sparticus. It was cliche, predictable and very simple in it's presentation of the same basic premise of Sparticus. There were many other films that were far more deserving of the oscar that year. Requiem is just one of them.
The most interesting thing here (apart from the fact that you got the years wrong) is that I disagree with the oscars frequently but disagree MORE with every single example you gave - with the exception of best actor 1999 (in reality 1998) which i think should have gone to Edward Norton for American History X.
Zero, go back and REREAD my very first post.........I said the year of the OSCARS.....NOT the year of the movie. And I agree that Edward Norton in American History X was superb. But I could care less if you agree with MY choices or not.....I asked people to post what they thought were Oscar rip-offs not flame my choices.
Didnt mean to flame your choices : Im normally the first person to yell foul where the academy awards is concerned : i was just amazed to see that you managed to choose options that given your choices I disagreed with right across the board (except for Ed.)
Sorry that wasnt interesting to you, but dont take it personally.
(& rather than go with what the academy and - lets face it - everyone else lists as the year for those films you came up with your own system. kudos for being outside the box...)
1998 Best Picture : Shakespeare in love was simply amusing fluff, but Saving Private Ryan was JUNK - Should have gone to Gary Oldmans Nil by Mouth or Chasing Amy.
2000 I would also have liked to see Requiem for a Dream pick up best film. - The fact that that year Russell Crowe won best actor for Grunting while Ed Harris was giving a masterclass in Pollock is almost laughable.
Half a dozen guys stumble across Normandy during the chaos of the invasion looking for ONE soldier when they only have the vaguest idea where he is... and find him. What LUCK! (JUNK.)
Whats left of this weary broken down rag-tag group then defeat an entire German tank division. (JUNK.)
A german that the good old humane americans let live earlier (because americans are decent god fearing types) comes back - amazingly bumps into the SAME group that let him live and proves that Nazis are bad by killing people. Almost unbearable cliched cinematic JUNK.
Then in one final act of "**** you" it turns out that the film is not being remembered in flashback by Tom Hanks as we were lead to think at the outset - because he's (weep for poor Forest Gump! War is sad!) dead - it's being remembered in flashback by Matt Damon - who wasn't even there for most of it. JUNK.
KMC Community Forums
Oscar Ripoffs
Aug 15th, 2004 06:27 AM
