everyone i know thought this was a sequal! the trailer looks great and this movie looks amazing but will anyone be able to see past the crapfest that was hulk?
i hope this movie is huge but is it to soon after lee's attempt to be a success?
Entertainment Weekly published a story that may be cause for concern -about a split between Ed Norton & Louis Letterier and Marvel Productions. Marvel is forcing a shorter running time of two hours; the director & star were looking for a longer film ( 2 hours 15 min.) Norton's not talking to the press right now.
Then again, he has a rep for interfering behind the scenes on films and being a pain in the ass. If they want a longer cut for a more cerebral film, that was the problem with the last one.
It will be an embarrassment for Marvel, if they can't get the Hulk right after two big-budget tries.
__________________
"I'm not smart so much as I am not dumb." - Harlan Ellison
The first film is highly under-rated. This film will be garbage, acting (so-far) looks shoddy, cg is piss-poor (I've seen video-games with better graphics) and the vaunted '26 minuite' fight scene will blow chunks.
I have to vehemently disagree. I think the new CGI model for the Hulk looks much better. Also, Edward Norton, like Eric Bana is a splendid actor. Also, Norton has the look and has a greater understanding of the characters.
i co sighn on what you just said. the cgi for the new hulk looks great. the beef with ang lee's movie was that he focused on the anger and strengh and no real hulk action
__________________
i like to sit on teh ****ing curb drawing lines of dead people on teh ****ing ground
u kno who u ar and im comin to ****ing get u
Are you kidding me? How can you say the acting looks poor? Alright you've seen less than five minutes of the movie and besides one or two lines you don't see a lot of acting. I've personally loved Edward Norton in every single thing I've seen him in. And he's one of the best actors out there imo. Piss-poor graphics? Yeah, right. Now I know you're biased against this movie, the last movies graphics looked like someone used the same CG as the cutscenes in Ultimate Alliance. Hulk and Abomination look amazing compared to "Hulk". And you're bashing a fight of which we haven't seen a second of yet. Wow. Just wow. That's all I have to say.
__________________ I've got a Charisma of 23, max ranks and skill focus in Seduction, and I just rolled a 17. Are we doing it yet?
Although, im not partial to the idea of Norton being cast as Banner. I have confidence that he will pull it off as will the rest of the cast. I do, however, have great reservations when it comes to the effects. The effects do look a bit dodgy, but i will hold all judgments until its release. Some of the effects in the iron man trailers looked questionable. The scene where iron man fires a rocket at the tank looked just like a cartoon in the trailer, but in the movie, it looked fantastic. I do think the design of the Hulk is much more appropriate than Li's version, but in defense of li, his movie had some very fine effects. The Ang li CGI suffered from poor character design's, but the effects in general were handled very well.
__________________ "If you tell the truth, you never have to remember anything" -Twain
(sig by Scythe)
Last edited by jinXed by JaNx on May 4th, 2008 at 02:23 AM
afraid hulk and abomination will not be strong enough...flippin cars/ hummers wtf , what kinda strength feat is that spiderman can do that as class 10 , hancock looks much stronger lol
__________________
Last edited by ankur29 on May 4th, 2008 at 07:44 PM
well, if your only focus is beating the shit out of your enemy. I dont think you would be to concerned with strength feats. But, yeah, it would be cool to see them taking down a building in the process of fighting
__________________ "If you tell the truth, you never have to remember anything" -Twain
(sig by Scythe)
Personally, I don't like the look of the new Hulk. He's clearly supposed to look like Banner which was jarring considering I don't think anyone has ever render Hulk that way.
__________________
Graffiti outside Latin class.
Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
A juvenal prank.
Maybe they figured it made sense. Why not? Otherwise, they're just two completely seperate beings. And Professor Hulk resembled Bruce Banner, remember.
__________________
"I'm not smart so much as I am not dumb." - Harlan Ellison
I read that they went through tons of different Hulk designs, everything from having a child-like Hulk, a "dead" Hulk, an animal-like Hulk, to how which green out of a pallet of some 800 odd different greens. The director had a reason for doing the Hulk like this for a reason (which I don't clearly recall).
Lee's Hulk looked like a big baby most of the time (facially) - although his frame and colour seems to be more on the money than this new Hulk.
__________________
Of what consequence are you now? These people, this world, they are nothing - the universe is power, pure unstoppable power - and I am that force, I am that power.