everyone i know thought this was a sequal! the trailer looks great and this movie looks amazing but will anyone be able to see past the crapfest that was hulk?
i hope this movie is huge but is it to soon after lee's attempt to be a success?
Entertainment Weekly published a story that may be cause for concern -about a split between Ed Norton & Louis Letterier and Marvel Productions. Marvel is forcing a shorter running time of two hours; the director & star were looking for a longer film ( 2 hours 15 min.) Norton's not talking to the press right now.
Then again, he has a rep for interfering behind the scenes on films and being a pain in the ass. If they want a longer cut for a more cerebral film, that was the problem with the last one.
It will be an embarrassment for Marvel, if they can't get the Hulk right after two big-budget tries.
__________________
Thanagar is now far behind me...
John Stewart and the Justice League are my new family...
Let all evil beware my mace - HAWKGIRL SMASH!
The first film is highly under-rated. This film will be garbage, acting (so-far) looks shoddy, cg is piss-poor (I've seen video-games with better graphics) and the vaunted '26 minuite' fight scene will blow chunks.
I have to vehemently disagree. I think the new CGI model for the Hulk looks much better. Also, Edward Norton, like Eric Bana is a splendid actor. Also, Norton has the look and has a greater understanding of the characters.
__________________
C.G.B. Spender: You'd die for Mulder, but you won't allow yourself to love him.
i co sighn on what you just said. the cgi for the new hulk looks great. the beef with ang lee's movie was that he focused on the anger and strengh and no real hulk action
__________________
i like to sit on teh ****ing curb drawing lines of dead people on teh ****ing ground
u kno who u ar and im comin to ****ing get u
Are you kidding me? How can you say the acting looks poor? Alright you've seen less than five minutes of the movie and besides one or two lines you don't see a lot of acting. I've personally loved Edward Norton in every single thing I've seen him in. And he's one of the best actors out there imo. Piss-poor graphics? Yeah, right. Now I know you're biased against this movie, the last movies graphics looked like someone used the same CG as the cutscenes in Ultimate Alliance. Hulk and Abomination look amazing compared to "Hulk". And you're bashing a fight of which we haven't seen a second of yet. Wow. Just wow. That's all I have to say.
__________________ My Music Videos
PSN name: Carnificus I want...I want my phone call. I want my phone call. -Joker
Gender: Male Location: behind there, near here, next to yo
Although, im not partial to the idea of Norton being cast as Banner. I have confidence that he will pull it off as will the rest of the cast. I do, however, have great reservations when it comes to the effects. The effects do look a bit dodgy, but i will hold all judgments until its release. Some of the effects in the iron man trailers looked questionable. The scene where iron man fires a rocket at the tank looked just like a cartoon in the trailer, but in the movie, it looked fantastic. I do think the design of the Hulk is much more appropriate than Li's version, but in defense of li, his movie had some very fine effects. The Ang li CGI suffered from poor character design's, but the effects in general were handled very well.
__________________ "If you tell the truth, you never have to remember anything"
-TWAIN
Last edited by ragesRemorse on May 4th, 2008 at 02:23 AM
afraid hulk and abomination will not be strong enough...flippin cars/ hummers wtf , what kinda strength feat is that spiderman can do that as class 10 , hancock looks much stronger lol
__________________
Last edited by ankur29 on May 4th, 2008 at 07:44 PM
Gender: Male Location: behind there, near here, next to yo
well, if your only focus is beating the shit out of your enemy. I dont think you would be to concerned with strength feats. But, yeah, it would be cool to see them taking down a building in the process of fighting
__________________ "If you tell the truth, you never have to remember anything"
-TWAIN
Gender: Male Location: al-Jumhuuriyya al-Yamaniyya
Personally, I don't like the look of the new Hulk. He's clearly supposed to look like Banner which was jarring considering I don't think anyone has ever render Hulk that way.
__________________
Sig by JasonK4
In the Heaven I'm headed to/ There's a place for preachers, thieves and prostitutes/ Saints and soldiers, beggars, kings and renegades
Maybe they figured it made sense. Why not? Otherwise, they're just two completely seperate beings. And Professor Hulk resembled Bruce Banner, remember.
__________________
Thanagar is now far behind me...
John Stewart and the Justice League are my new family...
Let all evil beware my mace - HAWKGIRL SMASH!
I read that they went through tons of different Hulk designs, everything from having a child-like Hulk, a "dead" Hulk, an animal-like Hulk, to how which green out of a pallet of some 800 odd different greens. The director had a reason for doing the Hulk like this for a reason (which I don't clearly recall).
Lee's Hulk looked like a big baby most of the time (facially) - although his frame and colour seems to be more on the money than this new Hulk.
__________________
Of what consequence are you now? These people, this world, they are nothing - the universe is power, pure unstoppable power - and I am that force, I am that power.
KMC Community Forums
Apr 27th, 2008 07:49 PM
Sig by Inhuman
