the first movie I couldn't stand because it just seemed so. . i don't know, just you could tell that the actors didn't have much experience yet, but the secound movie was a) my least favorite book so i didn't really care b) much more fitting plot for a movie then the first and c) the actors got better so the movie was better. yay 2 cents
well i like the movies bcuz then u have daniel and rupurt and tom who are really hot...and emma whos so purdy! i luv the movies cuz im able to imange scences better cuz i kno how they look and sound like when im reading but the books are definetly better!
__________________ "Fool of a Took!"
"can anyone interpurate the cloudy stuff in ur cystal ball?" proff. treanewley
"yea, theres gonna be fog tonite" ron
I don't *hate* Harry Potter films, and I think most HP fans like them even if they complain about some/many aspects. In my opinion, the HP films create completely new characters, I mean, Hermione is way too different in the books. That is something I don't like at all, her relationship with Harry and Ron isn't as good as they describe it in the films.
"Happiness... is not a fish that you can catch." - oUr LaDy PeAcE
"The fear of loss is a path to the Dark Side" - Master Yoda
*rise my hand* yes the movies so far were "shite" indeed...
Harry potter world is too big to be in a two hours time movie(it was less but anyway
one book contains alot of clues that the one movie can't show for lack of time..and money...so I'm voting- bash the movies they destroying our imagination!-
and they cut all the best parts...and it's boring(compared to the books)....and the acting is very bad.
I agree with megajoint about the fact that too many good scenes were cut from the book
But what also got me was the fact that they added random bits too, like when Harry fell out of the flying car in CoS... where did that come from? Couldn't they have put in a bit from the book instead?