why would u want to remake such a crappy film?...give that last batman a remake...that was one the worst so its more deserving to remake it but dont f*ck it up...what am i saying...that movie sucked so bad even you couldn f*ck it up as bad as they do if u tried
I don't see the point, really. I mean, you can remake whatever you want to remake, but why bother?
__________________ "Men curse the Communist Party, but eventually it may release them. If hell were endless, then God would be worse than our Secret Police."--Pastor Valentin
why remake a super hero movie? It is not like they were going to be the only batman films man. They are makin new ones now. Yeah the first 4 had some High points, and low points but why? Shumachers were stupid but 30 or 40 years from now they will probably be making a new Batman, and possibly a new spider-man franchise of films.
haha, go ahead and make a remake if you wish. Anything would top the original batman forever for sure. I hope some producers may consider pretending the 3rd and 4th films never existed and continued the storyline from Batman Returns.
Give me a break,MICHALE KEATON was the worst casting choice in comicbook history.TIM BURTON only cast him because he did was friends with him,he did not care about making the best choice possible.PUDGY GUT,RECEDING HAIRLINE,HALF BALD,SHORT RUNT MICHAEL KEATON FOR TALL,MUSCULAR,HADSOME FULL SET OF HAIR BRUCE WAYNE? what a joke!!! thats something you would expect to see on saturday night live. VAL KILMER at least physically fit the role and did not look like a wuss like keaton did fighting the jokers goon-BATMAN got the crap beat out of him by one guy!!! what a joke. BATMAN is a martial arts expert,he should have handled that guy easily.at least kilmers batman could fight and looked like a martial arts expert.TIM BURTON IS AN IDIOT WHO KNOWS NOTHING AT ALL ABOUT BATMAN.he turned him into a cowardly killer and the first two were all about the villians,where BATMAN FOREVER was all about batman mostly.
Are you insane?
Burton portrayed Batman's character like no other, Keaton played his part brilliantly, the first two batman's were far superior to the next two. The focus wasnt necessarily supposed to be on Batman, as he is deemed to be the more mysterious type. I thought he talked too much in 'forever', it should have been more about the villians like the first two. I'm surprised you think the complete opposite.
No other as being horrible like no other batman incarnation. the first two were superiour as being superiourly worse. what keaton did was just copy cat the performance of chris reeve in superman,hardly anything original there,and so what if he did a good acting job,he was so physically wrong for the role unlike christina bale is,so he shoud NEVER have been cast for the role. if the movie is going to be all about the villains then the first one should have been called THE JOKER and the 2nd,THE PENGUIN AND CATWOMAN.
Worst problem I had with BF was the way Tommy Lee Jones portrayed Two-Face. He was basically just doing his best Joker impersonation. Two-Face isn't all essentric like that...he's more brooding and angry.
ok general, i'm curious. i'll bite. are you still doing this? i just found this thread the other day and got curious. i ....er. *shuffles feet* *blush* kinda liked that movie. i'm curious, wotcha gonna do?
ALL THE BATMAN MOVIES SUCKED. THE THREE BATMAN ACTORS SUCKED,BUT KILMER SUCKED THE LEAST, THE SCRIPTS SUCKED, THE DIRECTORS SUCKED. BATMAN SUCKED,BATMAN RETURNS SUCKED, BATMAN FOREVER SUCKED, BATMAN AND ROBIN SUCKED.
__________________ The beatles, best group ever.
John Lennon, Musical genius of all time
Helen Mirren and Julie Christie , most lovely british actresses of all time.
the tim burtons batmans where better then the joel shumacher ones, no doubt AT ALL, about this. forever is a huge piece of crap, but batman & robin has the amazing feet of being even worst.