Feel free to also list a SINGLE (for the idiots who don't get it first time around, SINGLE) album that you feel goes by your criteria of what makes a great album.
Don't say "I can't pick one" and list five. If you can't pick one, pick none.
Theres plenty I like, but I'll pick Blink 182 - Enema of the State.
I love every single song on that album, no flaws. I dont think any of their other albums have matched it so far. Take Off Your Pants and Jacket by comparison has some damn good songs, but when they throw in rubbish like Mother's Day and Happy Holidays You Bastard, which arent even real songs, they reduce the point of an album and just use it to fill time.
For a good album, you should be able to tell just by listening, how much time and effort went into making it. What I like about Enema is that not all the songs are the same, some are slow, some are fast...mixing it up helps and doesnt make you feel like your listening to the same song 15 times over. Speaking of, if you can listen to each song by itself over and over and not get tired of it, theres a good album.
Gender: Unspecified Location: With Cinderella and the 9 Dwarves
A great Album. There are multiple things a truly great album needs. Of course on the one hand the quantity of good songs on it (or at least the ratio great songs to not so great songs) . Then if one can listen it from start to end easily and enjoy it (do the songs work with each other). I like when it has different sounds on it, so that it'S not the same again and again, too. There are probably way more things but I can't be bothered writing them down.
Now I feel that "Kid A" (Radiohead) for example is a great Album...
And jsut to piss AC off, "Louder than bombs" (The Smiths) justifies as one as well (and I do realize that it is just a compilation, it is a great Album nonetheless.)
My post specifically requested that it didn't happen. It isn't acceptable for you to then do the opposite .
I never post mine until I get a good few replies. No specific reason, just the way I am with threads. I didn't post it to talk about my opinion, I posted it to see others.
A good song doesn't make a great album but I'm curious, though. Albums that I think are truly amazing might be viewed as not that good to others. Albums that other people think are great might not be that good to me, or good at all. I think a lot of people tend to use the term "great" in replace of the term "good". Instead of it being applied to things they believe are truly great, it gets applied to a lot of mediocre material.
I really, really like At the Drive-In for example. I wouldn't go and say that Relationship of Command is a "great" album just because I like it a lot. If I called it great, then you went and looked at a Mr. Bungle album that I also call great, it wouldn't add up.
Gender: Unspecified Location: With Cinderella and the 9 Dwarves
I see what you mean, I think. But is it even possible to apply the term "great" to any album then. I think what one thinks is good is always subjective. So everyone has other albums they find "great" (I use "great" as "some of the better" in this case). Do you mean that great is something objective while good is something everyone has to decide for themself?
I was thinking about that today. Infact I was going to use it as my example. Music preference depending, there really is not a bad or just "good" song on that album. It's all very good or excellent. Master of Puppets truly is a great album.
I'm not saying there's a right or wrong. Just asking what people think is TRULY great. Just think, is it an album you like a lot? Is that what great means to you? If so, name the album and say why. If great means something unbelievably and extraordinary, then do the same.
With that past thread, not to go off topic, I was trying to see what people thought made a legendary song. Not necessarily a good one. EG: YMCA is legendary.
I say good albums have 50-50 or so good songs/bad songs, nothing to write home about, but worth a listen. A great album has almost all songs on it that are definitely better than other works.
Hmm..after reading this...its kinda harder to pinpoint a 'great' album....for the latter part, I'd pick SoaD - Mezmerize. Its just.....awesome.
Last edited by Hazardous on Jan 12th, 2006 at 02:08 PM
IMO AC, I think there are several criteria that make a good album, and then I will give you an example of one....again in IMO, of one that fits the criteria.
The criteria are as follows, not in any order:
a) sales
b) quantity of songs that made it "mainstream"- (not necessarily some top 40 music chart either)
c) longevity of the songs- (aka-do they still get air time on the radio)
d) longevity of the band- (do people know who the heck they are)
Lastly, bonus points awarded if the album revolutionized music or pioneered a new genre
An example for me would be the Beatles Sgt. Peppers.
Gender: Unspecified Location: With Cinderella and the 9 Dwarves
Well I believe you will always have to judge yourself. Great is nothing absolute. So although many people might agree that Master of Puppets, Ok Computer, Lateralus are great albums just as many won't. Now, this is slightly touching the debate you have in teh Us vs. Uk thread but I think just technique, also measurable, doesn't account for a great album..neither does lack of it account for a bad one. The only thing one can maybe use as scale are the sales/download histories...but really...do you think that "Simon and Garfunkel: Live in Central Park", "Beatles - 1" or "50 Cent - Get Rich or Die trying" are great albums? Well they sold very well though. You can't really pinpoint an absolute "great" album, the only thing you can show is why you, yourself think an album is great.
[edit] You see what BobbyD said, is all measurable...but at least for me..and I dont think for you either....that doesn't make a great Album (I mean I liek Sgt. Pepper, but "great" ...not in my opinion.) Like you said, there'S a difference between Legendary and Great.
Gender: Unspecified Location: With Cinderella and the 9 Dwarves
HEY....there's nothing wrong with being mentally insane....the Mad Hatter told me. But that's what I am saying...I just wanted to clarify my view......a bit......
True, but.....no one would dare consider her albums to be amongst the best of all time. So w/o a nomination, none of her albums would ever enter the equation. See what I mean?
KMC Community Forums
Jan 12th, 2006 09:59 AM
.
