Just wondering, whats so great about Superbands? I mean, I dont listen to as much rock as I think I should, but from what Ive heard, between a supergroup and a regular plain old fashioned good group, they can be equal.
My question is: Do superbands really tend to be reflective of their superosity?
I'll take your word for it. However, I think to be a superband you need to be the combination of already well accomplished musicians. I don't know, but were either of those bands famous before their malgamation?
Not really, but sometimes. Cream was exceptionally good. I sorta made this thread because I've started to listen to a lot more of their stuff and its awesome.
I really like Journey as well and they probably the most successful superband.
I think Audioslave is the best act in rock music right now and they are a superband, but my liking them is probably more a reflection of my liking older rock better because Audioslave is not as good as either Soundgarden or Rage Against the Machine.
Velvet Revolver is another current superband and I think they are one of the better acts around right now.
Yeah, Prince, Maceo parker (played with parliament, James brown..), John blackwell (amazing drummer), Candy Dulfer (She's Dutch, and really nice lol), Renato Neto, Rhonda smith (Nice Jazzy Bassplay).
__________________
It's an image worth pondering for a moment. Maybe, when you cut past the instrumental and songwriting virtuosity, the funny voices and characters, what is left is a man alone in his recording studio for days at a time.
Last edited by Funkadelic on Jan 7th, 2007 at 09:13 AM
KMC Community Forums
Superbands
Jan 5th, 2007 04:21 AM
Now a nice person!
