Registered: Jun 2016
Location: The Throne of the Sheevites
Why a sequel trilogy doesn't work
This essay isn't about the new films (I've already given my thoughts on them here), but rather the sequel trilogy as a concept. This is about why to having more movies taking place after Episode VI is fundamentally a flawed idea, and can only work well if very specific, nearly-impossible-to-attain criteria are met.
First, let's establish that the Star Wars films at their core are the story of Anakin Skywalker. Episode I shows him as a small kid, explains his origins, and has him set off on a grand adventure to become a Jedi Knight with the intended purpose of bringing balance to the Force since he's the Chosen One and all that. Episode II shows him on his quest, learning the Jedi ways, and sets up the threat of the Clone Wars and the hardships Anakin will have to endure to prevail. Episodes III and IV serve as the second act in the classic three-act structure where the heroes lose and are at their lowest point; for Anakin, this is when his hamartia results in him losing his loved ones, his humanity and his soul to the devil who in this case is represented through Darth Sidious, and he's reduced to a tool for the Empire whose only purpose in life is now is to please and run errands for his Master. Episode V is where things start to work in Anakin's favor again, and he sees an opportunity to set things right and get out of his misery through his son, Luke, and starts working towards that goal. Episode VI is where all the plotlines culminate, and Anakin redeems himself by fulfilling his intended purpose in bringing balance to the Force and destroying the Sith, meaning the Emperor but also himself, and he regains the things that he lost, mainly his humanity, but also his loved ones as seen at the end.
Thus, the purpose of Anakin's death at the end of Episode VI serves three narrative functions. First, it is the fulfilment of his existential purpose, the reason for why he's in this story in the first place: to bring balance to the Force, and he does this by killing the Sith, which he is a part of, so his death is in a way part of the prophecy. Second, it is the fulfilment of his personal goal: Anakin isn't just a plot device, he is a person, so he has some personal stake in the story as well, and that is to love and to be loved eternally, motives that are mostly explored in Episodes II and III, where he exclaims his desire to learn to prevent himself and others from dying so that he can feel and express his love forever; by sacrificing himself for the sake of his son, he has regained his love for his family, and in death he can finally be with his loved ones eternally as is shown in the final scene with him as a ghost, which is what he wanted all along. And finally, the third narrative purpose Anakin's death serves is as a signal that the story has come to and end; it's his story, so you can't tell the story without him in it, so when he is gone, it means that there is no more story to tell.
And that's the fundamental reason why the sequel trilogy should not exist. Anakin's story has already been told. No, Anakin isn't the only person in the universe and the galaxy will continue to exist and evolve long after him, but that's what the Expanded Universe of books, comics, and other media is for. The films are meant for this particular story - Anakin's story - and for nothing else. You might say that the films are also Luke's story, since he's the protagonist for half of them, but that's a misconstrued view things. Even in the original trilogy, when viewed in the context of the larger saga, the story is still about Anakin. It is told through Luke's perspective, but it is not his story (like how much of the prequels is told from Obi-Wan's point of view, but the story still isn't about him); it's the conclusion of Anakin's story but only a small chunk in Luke's story; he still has a Jedi Order to rebuild and a New Republic to establish, but all that was told in the books because the films aren't about Luke. They're about Anakin: his birth, life, and death.
The only possible way to make a another trilogy after Episode VI that I can see is to have it be about Anakin's legacy, the immediate consequences of his life's decisions and what he left behind in the galaxy, but the proper execution of something like that would be so hard I honestly have no clue where you would even begin. The primary reason for that is that the new trilogy cannot tell its own story; it has to be part of Anakin's story. You'd essentially have to produce three films of material about a guy who isn't even alive anymore; come up with a narrative and thematic purpose for these films' existence, so that it feels like an organic part of the story, enrichens the previous films, and is important enough that the overall narrative would be lesser without it; and extend plot threads for three whole films when every single one of them has already been concluded, basically meaning that you'd have to somehow make Episode IX a more meaningful, satisfying and fulfilling ending for Anakin's story than Episode VI, the part where he dies and finishes both his existential quest for the prophecy and personal quest for love everlasting. If you somehow can pull all of that off (you can't), then I'm onboard with your sequel trilogy, but otherwise, no thanks.
Now, I'm perfectly aware that what I'm describing might not even be humanly possible, but that's the thing: you don't edit art after it has been finished. The sequels as a concept are essentially the equivalent of if someone started making unnecessary additions to the Mona Lisa or whatever work of art you can think of, with the end result being worse with a certainty of 99.99999999999999 %.
I dislike peoples saying Disney doesn't care. I mean, yeah, they don't, but they do care about making money, and so they try to make good content. And I like some of the content. I don't like other content, but I don't go around saying it's because it's objectively bad and no one put any effort into it.
As for Azronger's post:
It's not about Anakin. I mean, it is, but it wasn't meant to be. The original concept was about a small group of people trying to run from and destroy the evil empire, and it's going to be in space, so it's going to have that thematic element.
Now, I know George Lucas had more to tell, like this entire backstory on the Jedi, and how the empire was taken over, and how Vader was Luke's father, but that vision, which he tried to realize in the first film, failed so hard that every person that saw the original screening said this film sucked.
Then, his wife at the time came in and edited all the backstory out, and we got the thing that people actually liked: not this whole complicated Anakin's story, but a compelling adventure of three heroes in a unique thematic setting. Then, when it was a success, Episode V continued that concept till the end, where all the backstory that Lucas so badly wanted was revealed. Then Return of the Jedi expertly gave hints to what that backstory was, but the film was never as enjoyable as the first two; it had the setting and the characters, but it didn't have the tiny rebels running away from the big imperials. It focused on Vader's story.
This is what made it hard to make good prequels. If the prequels were well-made movies, some fans still wouldn't like them, because they wouldn't follow the small rebels running away from the big imperials structure which made the world fall in love with star wars in the first place. Some people still would like them, but the reaction would be similar to the sequels that we're getting now. Fortunately, in a way, the prequels were just so badly made that the utter cinematic failure of them overshadowed their new format/concept, and star wars fans just went on being star wars fans, ignoring the prequels as a bad moment in star wars history.
Now, some people, like me and you Az, who love the "lore" aspect in any story looked at the prequels, we appreciated their extention of the lore of star wars. We liked that the whole prequels told the story of Anakin Skywalker, as they were meant to, originally in Lucas' vision. But we were in the minority.
Now we get to the sequels. The sequels are doing the exact opposite of the prequels. They're appealing SO much to what made the originals good that they're not being creative. All the machines and character designs look the exact same as they did in the last film. They are trying (and failing, but that's another matter) at capturing the theme of the originals. More importantly, it's still rebels vs imperials. It doesn't make sense for the larger narrative, but remember, people who just watched the films don't care about the narrative. They want engaging films, the kind they watched when they were kids.
This causes people like you and me to despise the nonsensical story that the sequels tell, of Anakin just being gone, and the new republic being devastated by the first order, and us just regressing right back to where we started, to our lowest point, but most people don't care. They have their narrow, engaging narrative of rebels vs imperials, of 3 or 4 heroes vs 1 bad guy, and that's all they need.
So, a sequel trilogy (done well, of course) isn't a bad idea, it's just...for a particular audience.
I wish George Lucas was able to do his original 12 movie set up. Episode 1 would have been the "Prologue" Anakin and Obi meet up and how they become Jedi. 2, 3, and 4 would have been about the Clone wars and Anakins fall. 5 would have served as a film that connects the prequels to the Original trilogy. 6 7 and 8 would have been the Original trilogy and 9 10 and 11 the sequel trilogy, with 12 being the epilogue to the saga.
__________________ "Vader's pulse and breathing were machine-regulated, so they could not quicken; but something in his chest became more electric around his meetings with the Emperor; he could not say how. A feeling of fullness, of power, of dark and demon mastery -- of secret lusts, unrestrained passion, wild submission -- all these things were in Vader's heart as he neared his Emperor. These things and more."
I don't know...the movies weren't my favorite part of star wars, and you know the kinds of things George Lucas would try to do with the lore. It was better left to the writers.
And there's also the matter of how it would be good for people who like the lore aspect, but would kind of kill the excitement of people who liked the original films for what they were. And that would have likely caused some backlash.
And as far as filmmaking goes, prequels always work better as fanservice, so when you make an entire saga out of the prequels and try to make them seem important somehow, when we already know how the more important part ends, then it makes for a weird story.
And Lucas himself admitted later on that an "episode 7" after Return of the Jedi would be a bad idea, because you'd need a new threat after the empire, the ultimate evil, has already been defeated. That would make things weird.
Registered: May 2007
Location: Best company on the planet
Acting like Disney doesn’t care is entirely retarded. Great product means more money so this whole idea they don’t care is just asinine. Silly butthurt fans.
Registered: May 2007
Location: Best company on the planet
Your feelings don’t count, kid. Objective reality is different than your pitiful feelings of self loathing misplaced into the universe. If you can’t prove your claims then they are baseless like your existence.
I really think people need to accept that just because they don't like something doesn't mean no effort was put into them. There are people in the world who like the new canon, guys.
Perhaps, but I think the main thing is that you can't please everyone. And whenever you piss off even a small portion of the fanbase (in something as big as star wars), the backlash will be dramatic, an overreaction, and far greater than the people who enjoy the films, even if they're in the majority. And I think Solo flopped before it came out. People expected it to be terrible. But if you ask me, it was actually really good.
I don't think the previous films sucked all that much. I think Solo's hate came from other factors. Can't name them all right now, I haven't looked that much into it, but people wearing "Soylo" shirts, and the hate for Alden Ehenriech before we even got to see his performance, and perhaps just the lack of enthusiasm for star wars lately make me think it's something else.
Registered: May 2007
Location: Best company on the planet
False, this is your idiocy on full display. Poor leadership, a bad idea for a film, right in the heels of a butthurt fan base who can’t acfelt the gem that is the Last Jedi led to this moment on top of a much busier and more competitive May release.
They didn’t want Star Wars to flop and the budget, planning, and manpower suggest otherwise.
No, the fans have been pissed off many, many times maybe not to this extent but they cried over Lucas’ prequels and his changes to his own films. It’s well documented how butthurt this fan base gets. Hell, many of the fans make their disdain for the prequels well known. It’d a fanbase the hardcore that generally suck tbh. Narrow minded individuals like yourself who can’t be pleased no matter what if it diverges from your own ideas about what Star Wars is.
Fans like myself will pay the price for this flop and less Star Wars and fantasy overall. I went and saw it twice. I’m a fan who doesn’t bleed out of my vagina like yourself when things don’t go exactly my way in a Star Wars film.