jacobo0o
Senior Member
Gender: Male Location: South Korea, Seoul
roman gladiator vs. samurai
who would win this fight in a 1:1
a roman gladiator has his armors , shield and his sword
vs
a samurai has his armors and a katanna
i think a roman gladiator would win since he has better defense
but what do u guys think?
__________________
Jan 11th, 2006 02:22 AM
Quincy
Debaser
Gender: Male Location: Through The Looking Glass
um....Samurai.
But they'd be nothing compared to me.
__________________
Sig by Scribble
Jan 11th, 2006 02:25 AM
jacobo0o
Senior Member
Gender: Male Location: South Korea, Seoul
u must be a god
__________________
Jan 11th, 2006 02:25 AM
The Red
Senior Member
Gender: Male Location: BFE, Indiana
Wrong forum for this you know?
__________________
Jan 11th, 2006 02:26 AM
Darth Macabre
Grey King of the Debb
Gender: Male Location: Wales
What kind of Gladiator do you mean? A murmillones? A andabatae? A laquerii?
There's more to it then just a Gladtiator.
__________________
The only thing thats with you your whole life is complete and utter darkness.
Jan 11th, 2006 02:31 AM
Koala MeatPie
Tonk's Husband
Gender: Male Location: Cute And Fluffy In My Tummy
Samurai, MUCH faster and dexterous.
It has been proven through cadavers found that Gladiators where obesse
__________________
Jan 11th, 2006 02:33 AM
Darth Macabre
Grey King of the Debb
Gender: Male Location: Wales
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Koala MeatPie
Samurai, MUCH faster and dexterous.
It has been proven through cadavers found that Gladiators where obesse
Not obese, just bulky with muscle from their training. It has been proven that instead of losing weight before a match, they would actually gain it.
__________________
The only thing thats with you your whole life is complete and utter darkness.
Jan 11th, 2006 02:35 AM
bogen
Senior Member
Gender: Male Location: purgatory
N00B!!!!, what a dumb question.
the samurai would OWN
__________________
Facebook
Cheers starlock, your a champ.
Jan 11th, 2006 03:18 AM
Kotarija
Lone Soul
Gender: Male Location: UK
A functional Katana would be sharp enough to cut through his armor either way, and totally eliminate this gladiator quickly before the gladiator even moves.
So Samurai FTW!!
__________________
Flith, ChickenMeat, Roulette, Mystifier, Raven Guardia
Jan 11th, 2006 03:26 AM
DarkC
-KMC THREAD KILLER-
Gender: Male Location: Cacapoopoopeepeeshire.
Samurai with a katana: Win, win, and WIN!
The world's best katana has enough force to be able to cut through ten bodies with a single concentrated stroke. It costs $10,000 or more.
__________________
Jan 11th, 2006 03:27 AM
cruel jedi
A PrOpHeT oF tHe DaRkSiDe
Gender: Male Location: At the egde of the abyss
thats sharp!
__________________
<<<Scatter Senbonzakura>>>
Jan 11th, 2006 01:55 PM
Itzak
The other extreme
Gender: Male Location: 1 of 247,832,596 places I've been
quote: (post ) Originally posted by DarkC
Samurai with a katana: Win, win, and WIN!
The world's best katana has enough force to be able to cut through ten bodies with a single concentrated stroke. It costs ,000 or more.
Yeah, and not only that but a real Katana weighs about 15 lbs. Some even 20 lbs. And a Samurai is trained to be fast, so to move a sword that weighs that much and still move fast. I'm gonna say the Samurai wins, because it's extreme speed in great control.
__________________
Jan 11th, 2006 02:07 PM
lil bitchiness
-
Gender: Female Location: Limassol, Cyprus
Moderator
Gladiators, were mostly slaves, made to fight mostly against their will, while Samurai were elite trained warriors. (and the off spin of those who were bandits were ninjas)
Anywho - what samurai would lack in armour he would more than make up for in skill.
__________________
في هذا العالم ثلاثة أشخاص أفسدوا البشرية : راعي غنم , طبيب و راكب الجمال , و راكب الجمال هو أسوأ نشال و أسوأ مشعوذ بين الثلاثة
Jan 11th, 2006 02:09 PM
T.M
Welcome to The Suck
Gender: Male Location: Mountains of Madness
quote: (post ) Originally posted by lil bitchiness
Gladiators, were mostly slaves, made to fight mostly against their will, while Samurai were elite trained warriors. (and the off spin of those who were bandits were ninjas)
Anywho - what samurai would lack in armour he would more than make up for in skill.
Took the words right out of my mouth.
Gladiators were not trained like Samurai's so therefore i think the Samurai would kill the Gladiator easily.
__________________
Jan 11th, 2006 02:28 PM
Deathblow
-
Gender: Male Location: London, UK.
Most samurai were also highly adept archers too, which gives them another obvious advantage.
__________________
Jan 11th, 2006 02:32 PM
WanderingDroid
THE LOOSE CANNON
Gender: Male Location: Welfare Kingdom of California
Re: roman gladiator vs. samurai
quote: (post ) Originally posted by jacobo0o
who would win this fight in a 1:1
a roman gladiator has his armors , shield and his sword
vs
a samurai has his armors and a katanna
i think a roman gladiator would win since he has better defense
but what do u guys think?
Samurai would have to strike in an open area of the armor. Katana's are great swords...but they may not resist the mighty blow of a Gladiators blade.
Now if you want to make it interesting.....change it to a Veteran Gladiator vs. a Shogun and the fight would be much more difficult.
__________________
Jan 11th, 2006 06:52 PM
Bloigen
Restricted
Gender: Male Location:
Account Restricted
Well, if the Samurai was a ronin. They could both lose.
__________________
[SPOILER - highlight to read]: You were adopted.
Jan 11th, 2006 06:57 PM
Davehead
BEWY!
Gender: Male Location: Why, in my pants of course!
Whether it's a ronin or not makes no difference in its skill. A ronin is just a samurai without a master.
Jan 11th, 2006 11:29 PM
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
Text-only version