During Justin Timberlake and Janet Jackson's performance at the halftime of the Superbowl, Justin Timberlake tore off part of Janet Jackson's costume, exposing her breast. The chief federal regulator of broadcasting said Monday he was ordering an immediate frieking investigation of this!!
Who else thinks this is outrageous!? Why are people like Li'l Kim allowed to run around award shows with one breast hanging out, with something covering the nipple, but when something accidentally happens on stage, they get more crap??
__________________
I Love You Likey
Tuu hai merii likey!! Duur se paas ham ho rahe hain!!
i didnt see it....cuz i went 2 get coffee, but i think some1 should pay for this....the whole Britney/Madonna kiss didnt bother me...tho i found it kinda sad that they would do that for publicity. anywayz... that was the vmas...u would expecet that, but for at the superbowl...w/ millions of families watchin 2 do that....its embarrasing...this is a football game not the Grammys...and janet is gettin a little old 2 be showin her boob to the world
I don't think it was an accident. My point was, why can people like Li'l Kim purposely expose her boob to the public more than once but she doesn't get as much crap as these two have for exposing JJ's boob for less than 5 seconds!?
__________________
I Love You Likey
Tuu hai merii likey!! Duur se paas ham ho rahe hain!!
Last edited by HannaBananabal on Feb 4th, 2004 at 12:17 AM
What Stewie said earlier is a good answer to this question. It's because a lot of families were watching the superbowl. At the award shows you expect people to dress and act like that, but not where you know a lot of families will be watching. I was one of those people sitting there with my wife and daughter, and I thought that was very uncalled for.
JJ didnt expose a nipple. It was covered just like lil' kim's. Like it was said before, families were watch.If I'm not mistaken MTV is PG 13 so...a few things fly.