 |
maifoshis
Senior Member
 Gender: Male Location: Training with the 501st |
was casino royale a prequel or the new bond?
was casino royale the first bond film showing how he was refined into a smooth super spy or was it showing the next bond after bronsnan?
|
Nov 25th, 2006 02:19 PM |
|
|
|  |
 |
SpikeSpiegel
Swimming Bird
 Gender: Male Location: United Kingdom |
It was a reboot of the series, just like they did with Hulk, Battlestar Galactica or Batman Begins. They ignore all previous contenuity and start again.
__________________
|
Nov 25th, 2006 02:45 PM |
|
|
|  |
 |
Raoul
Astonishing...
 Gender: Male Location: Republic of Ireland |
But arent all bond switches like that? they arent very linear, so i think it can be either...
__________________
"celtic god of pwnage"
|
Nov 25th, 2006 07:22 PM |
|
|
|  |
 |
Myth
Give me your babies!!!
 Gender: Male Location: Oregon |
I believe it is just considered a separate story. Technically it is a prequel since it was when he first became Bond, but for the most part it is just a story to tell. I'm assuming the next one will be considered between this one and what has been made in the past, but there may not be much mention of what just happened either.
Its not like Batman Begins either. Batman Begins is a true reboot. The intro to Joker has already been different and the movie is definitely not considered a prequel by its makers. Bond is always referred to as Bond 21, showing that the creaters see it as the same series.
__________________

Greg Oden: The future of the Blazers. The future of the NBA.
|
Nov 26th, 2006 12:05 AM |
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
Myth
Give me your babies!!!
 Gender: Male Location: Oregon |
It is to an extent, but it is also a prequel unlike Batman Begins which is its own separate series.
__________________

Greg Oden: The future of the Blazers. The future of the NBA.
|
Nov 26th, 2006 11:37 PM |
|
|
|  |
 |
Awesome Man
Restricted
Gender: Male Location: United States Account Restricted |
I think it's a prequel. I think that all Bond films are connected. If a film is remade, then the remake takes its place.
__________________

"HUZZAH!"
|
Nov 27th, 2006 02:14 AM |
|
|
|  |
 |
coolmovies
Senior Member
 Gender: Male Location: United Kingdom |
They are just carrying on the bond serias .
__________________

|
Nov 28th, 2006 01:46 PM |
|
|
|  |
 |
barand1
Senior Member
 Gender: Male Location: United Kingdom |
I believe it is a reboot to the series. The Bond films that will follow Casino Royale will have nothing to do with Dr. No - Die Another Day, just like Casino Royale. It is a fresh start.
__________________
http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/
http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/trailermaker/view/7frbbc
|
Nov 28th, 2006 02:12 PM |
|
|
|  |
 |
coldbluebond
Junior Member
Gender: Location: United States |
Seems like a reboot, but not exactly. I feel like they're all Bond movies and time/actor/all that stuff doesn't matter much.
|
Nov 28th, 2006 06:11 PM |
|
|
|  |
 |
Ushgarak
Paladin
 Gender: Male Location: Chelmsford, Essex, UK Moderator |
Bond doesn't actually HAVE a set continuity so it doesn't matter.
__________________

"We've got maybe seconds before Darth Rosenberg grinds everybody into Jawa burgers and not one of you buds has the midi-chlorians to stop her!"
"You've never had any TINY bit of sex, have you?"
BtVS
|
Nov 29th, 2006 11:41 AM |
|
|
|  |
 |
jdea
Senior Member
Gender: Male Location: United States |
Casino Rayale is most deffinetly a prequel. The directors wanted it to be the story of how and why Bond became the Bond we know and love today.
source (superherohype.com)
__________________
Ideas, are the sole things driving humanity.
I love this stuff!!!
|
Dec 2nd, 2006 07:54 PM |
|
|
|  |
 |
Chume1840
Junior Member
Gender: Location: |
WHy
Why in every new james bond movie he keeps getting younger and not older??? Is there some type of drug he is talking to last so long??
|
Dec 15th, 2006 05:35 AM |
|
|
|  |
 |
Kallark-Kent
Symbiote
 Gender: Male Location: Living Costume
Currently On:No-one |
This is the first book written so a prequel I guess.
__________________
|
Dec 15th, 2006 05:38 PM |
|
|
|  |
 |
((The_Anomaly))
2003 Super Senior Member
 Gender: Male Location: Ontario, Canada |
Its a prequel but only so much as Bond could have a prequel. Bond doesn't really happen to have any real continuity to follow. Although Casino Royal is supposed to be the "first" Bond and thats where the confusion comes in as the other bonds could be randomly shown in a random order and still make sense as there is no real timeframe. Thats why is confusing as it is the first one to say "this is the start of the Bonds" but the rest of them have no actual order in terms of continuity.
__________________

BRAWL FRIEND CODE: 3823-8176-3726
|
Mar 29th, 2007 04:12 AM |
|
|
|  |
 |
DarthLazious
Dark Lord of the KMC
 Gender: Male Location: United States |
It was a prequel.
__________________
Join The Lair Of The Sith
http://www.geocities.com/thelairofthesith/home.html
|
Aug 15th, 2007 05:56 PM |
|
|
|  |
 |
glunark
Junior Member
Gender: Male Location: United Kingdom |
Bond did have a continuity.
As crazy as it sounds the Bond we saw the last of in Die another day, was still meant to be the same person who was in from Dr No.
Bond reminisses on past adventures as Sean Connery, when he threatens to resign as Geroge Lazenby.
GL gets married, and when she dies, SC comes back for one last (official) time, to get revenge.
Roger Moore visits the grave of his wife in one of the later films, so we know he is still meant to be the same person too, plus at that point, all three actors so far had been roughly the same age, in fact Moore is a year older than Connery.
The actor playing Bond then got younger when Timothy Dalton took over, but it was still meant to be the same Bond, who still mourned for his wife, and they even tied him in with the first person to ever return as Felix Lightner for two films in Licence to kill.
Brosnan again still mentions the dead wife, again still locking him down as the same character, if you want to justify how young he looks, then you have to say, the old films still took place, but not nessisarily in the years we are used to them taking place in.
Kind of like how the year Homer and Marge met keeps coming forwards in the Simpsons as they are locked into meeting half a year longer than Bart is old, and since Bart never ages...
Daniel Craig is the first Bond actor who comes with no back story, no continunity, I know the fact that Judi Dench is still M is confusing, but she was locked into a contract.
And since they have started again, this means all the books can be made again, if they want to go down that route.

|
Aug 27th, 2007 04:14 AM |
|
|
|  |
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
Text-only version |
|
|