Its a little to early to start talking about who would come after Daniel Craig as 007. Remember, Casino Royale was one the most successful Bond film to date and Craig is being hailed as, if not the best Bond, then the best Bond since Connery. So unless he walks away after his 3 film deal, he should continue to be Bond for quite some time.
No. Craig was crap. No offence to him as an actor, but I dont feel he was what James Bond was originally meant to be like in terms of Ian Flemings character. His performance was great - but I dont think he performed as James Bond.
yeah ANYBODY is an improvement over Brosnan. I'll take Craig anyday of the year.The Bond movies should have ended with Moore but since they havent and will continue as long as they keep making movies,doesnt really matter,the Bond movies are tiresome now.
I don't know really. Just doesn't look right, wouldn't be able to get Spooks out of my mind, another 'spy' like thing he has done, wouldn't be able to get a terrible interview where he went on about how beautiful he is out of my head... ugh. Pretty boy. No to him.
hahaha...sounds as good a reason as any...i think if he were to be bond he would have to bulk up a bit cause he is a bit too weedy....but i think he's good enough to carry it off....more so that his predecessor on spooks, Matthew Mcfadyen