How did WTC7 fall if this Madrid Tower survived an intense fire

This video show's a really intense fire of a Skyscraper in Madrid,Spain.This building burned for 18 hour's and did not fall.

How could WTC 7 fall with the minimal debris damage and small fire?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3422960340283884442&hl=en

Because the official story says so.

Or, alternatively, because the damage was not minimal. It was actually extensive. Statements otherwise are either misinformed or lies.

bullshit. bullshit

Not to mention that the building wasn't hit with a plane...might have missed that?

And good defense, Deano nope

Because the media is controlled by our evil government and they are only going to tell the american people what they want you to hear which are the fairy tales that the 9-11 commission has been saying.

Originally posted by Bespin Bart
Not to mention that the building wasn't hit with a plane...might have missed that?

And good defense, Deano nope

that point holds no water because there have been many cases in the past where a jetliner struck a building yet those buildings just like the apartment complex that was struck by a plane in new york recently by that new york yankees pitcher,stood their ground and did not collapse.yet somehow for the first time in history,the towers collapse -"in freefall manner no less" the way buildings do when they are blown up because the structures allegedly were weakend.

That plane was so much smaller, so the force of it hitting could not have been as great as a jetliner.

And if our government is evil, then why don't you just move to a different country?

the evil is global

Then just kill yourself and it'll all go away. 😄

that wont solve the problem

Originally posted by Alkaselzer
That plane was so much smaller, so the force of it hitting could not have been as great as a jetliner.

And if our government is evil, then why don't you just move to a different country?

Dude when I said commercial airliners I meant Jet airliners as huge as the ones that hit the towers.geez.Im not just talking about that one incident..There have been many cases before where commercial jetliners have crashed into buildings yet THOSE buildings did not collapse,they stood intact yet somehow for the first time in mankind,these towers collapsed when a jetliner hit it. I have been to some 9-11 conferences and I know this to be true because the researchers there were showing pics of commercial airliners-THE SAME SIZE AS THE ONES THAT HIT THE TOWERS since you did not understand thats what I meant by commercial airliners,huge commercial airliners that crashed into buildings and those buildings stood and did not fall-I repeat-did not fall!!!!!! yet for the first time in mankind history,these towers allegedley fell because a commerical airliner hit it.Yeah right.how many more fairy tales are you going to listen to? 🙄

Originally posted by Deano
the evil is global

yeah its hardly just here in the states.

And what, rambling about it on a message board where nobody gives a damn will solve everything?

of course it wont. but it can help a few people to look at different opinions instead of just mainstream news all the time

Parker, you did not say 'commercial' when talking to BB.

Please stop ranting like that. It is not a constructive way to post.

And there has never been a situation in the past similar to the one on 9/11.

And before they decide to twist words, that is to say that there has been no situation where a commercial jetliner struck a skyscraper...

And indeed, you were talking about the Yankee's player's plane that I responded to.

Thats irrelevent because a skyscraper would be less likely to fall instead of a building.thats laughable to believe that two towers would fall simutanoulsy at once as well like they did freefall no less within 30 minutes no less the SAME way buildings do like the kingdom where the seatte seahawks football team used to play when explosives were set off to detonate it.The towers fell the exact same way buildings like that one did that have been detonated and thats laughable that fires could have done it.contrary to what people think infowars proves all that.You can accept the truth what info wars says with all the experts Jones brings on or not.the fires were very minimul.Firefighters were recorded saying they thought the fires could be contained before the collapse.I been to 9-11 conferences,I have heard the recordings.

something else that has been mentioned many times before in the past is that WT7 the third building that collapsed later on that day,all you got to do is look at the photos and you can see that that buildng was never hit by any debris yet it somehow catches on fire and you can hear Larry Silversten saying that the best thing to do is pull it which demolition experts have said means in demolition terms-to set off explosives to take it down.

Didn't Ush just tell you to stop ranting?