BBC Reported Building 7 Collapse 20 Minutes Before It Fell
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7SwOT29gbc
the most discussed video on youtube at themoment.
An astounding video uncovered from the archives today shows the BBC reporting on the collapse of WTC Building 7 over twenty minutes before it fell at 5:20pm on the afternoon of 9/11. The incredible footage shows a BBC reporter talking about the collapse of the Salomon Brothers Building while it remains standing in the live shot behind her head.
Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
Wow, this is really old. Deano, you should just start one big WTC 7 thread instead of making several threads on one subject. We have too many 911 threads.
i know. just thought id bring it up in a new thread because it is being debated a lot right now
it can be moved if need be
so the building's still visible behind the guy in the shot?
I guess BBC just needs to hire better reporters......someone who will be able to distinguish between the 7 buildings of the site when reporting to the world. Must have made the him look like a jackass.......
"hey guys.......this building standing behind me just fell"......
An interesting article.
don't just look at the article itself, see the comments. Pretty great stuff if you ask me.
HOW can this still be going?
The BBC received garbled reports after the building became damaged and there was some comment that it 'might' collapse. By the time the BBC got to it they thought they were reporting a collapse, and it was just a spectaculary amusing moment that the BBC broadcast this with the damn thing still up in the background, to highlight what a mistake they had made.
Anyone trying to turn this into a conspiracy theory is utterly desperate. Very silly indeed.
It was just one of hundreds of inaccurate reports that day.
Originally posted by Ushgarak😆 Damn, I was hoping this would get at least two pages before it was debunked.
HOW can this still be going?The BBC received garbled reports after the building became damaged and there was some comment that it 'might' collapse. By the time the BBC got to it they thought they were reporting a collapse, and it was just a spectaculary amusing moment that the BBC broadcast this with the damn thing still up in the background, to highlight what a mistake they had made.
Anyone trying to turn this into a conspiracy theory is utterly desperate. Very silly indeed.
It was just one of hundreds of inaccurate reports that day.
Originally posted by Ushgarak
HOW can this still be going?The BBC received garbled reports after the building became damaged and there was some comment that it 'might' collapse. By the time the BBC got to it they thought they were reporting a collapse, and it was just a spectaculary amusing moment that the BBC broadcast this with the damn thing still up in the background, to highlight what a mistake they had made.
Anyone trying to turn this into a conspiracy theory is utterly desperate. Very silly indeed.
It was just one of hundreds of inaccurate reports that day.
A voice of reason rings clear in a forum that is often clouded with a fog of willful ignorance. Thank you. I wish you visited more often.
Well, literally speaking, as is already mentioned by the most hardened of theorists here, thwey got it from NBC who made the report first.
Secondly, I don't understand the thrust of your question. The building WAS damaged from the morning's attacks. That was hardly a secret, it was clear to all.
Because of the damage, some experts had expressed a fear it would collapse. One set of chinese whispers later and it got picked up by news organisations that it HAD collapsed. That's all.
You guys can't be this bad: http://tvnewslies.org/phpbb/index.php
Originally posted by Ushgarak
Secondly, I don't understand the thrust of your question. The building WAS damaged from the morning's attacks. That was hardly a secret, it was clear to all.
I don't get youyr post, you just stated that there was alot of confusion that day. But, now it was clear to all what specifically made the building fall that day?
Originally posted by Ushgarak
Because of the damage, some experts had expressed a fear it would collapse. One set of chinese whispers later and it got picked up by news organisations that it HAD collapsed. That's all.
Experts, what experts were there, please name them. Because I find it weird that experts new the buildings structure would fall with out explaining the strucutural behavior of building near collapse till this day.
Originally posted by Ushgarak
Err, they saw the building had been hit and had suffered widespread damage, and the message definitrely got out that a collapse was possible. This is really not a difficult concept.
Originally posted by Ushgarak
I can;t even get my head around your first objection; just read my post again.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CwjmqkjwnvQ
One person I believe is a firemen in the vid says "the building is going to blow up".
Somehow on 911 despite many gargled reports, one thing was clear as day. WTC 7 was hit by debris from the initial attack and was going to collapse. Who made is the original author of this claim and how did they come to this conclusion. Because WTC 7 was nowhere near as damaged as the Deutsche Bank Building
I've heard reports that state the Deutsche Bank Building ahd another building fall on it. Yet, I've heard no reports that it might collapse.
Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
Wow, this is really old. Deano, you should just start one big WTC 7 thread instead of making several threads on one subject. We have too many 911 threads.
agreed.also I already made that point and provided that link on Ashtars thread.The link shows that CNN reported that the building collapsed an hour before it fell and that BBc reported it collapsed 20 minutes before it fell.
Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
Somehow on 911 despite many gargled reports, one thing was clear as day. WTC 7 was hit by debris from the initial attack and was going to collapse. Who made is the original author of this claim and how did they come to this conclusion. Because WTC 7 was nowhere near as damaged as the Deutsche Bank BuildingI've heard reports that state the Deutsche Bank Building ahd another building fall on it. Yet, I've heard no reports that it might collapse.
The thing is the experts have said that damage done to it there was not enough damage to make it collapse also the building should have toppled over sideways,it shouldnt have fallen in freefall manner within seconds the same way buildings are that are purposly set off to bring buildings down.again thats what all the independent experts have said.Thats just logic and common sense.Also if you look at that pic,the main structures are still there,there is only one missing,No way in hell should that building have collapsed.something else to consider is its all just a little too coincidental that all 3 buildings owned by ONE man,just happen to go down that day.The odds of that happening are just crazy not to mention that none of the other buildings nearby collapsed even though they were hit MUCH worse. 🙄 I just now noticed you pointed that out about the bank building Ashtar,well done. 👆
Originally posted by Emperor AshtarIt was clear it was going to collapse to the people who were there. Whether it h ad or hadn't when the BBC got it is the confusion. Moron.
Where was this stated besides the BBC and who this?I've read your post and doesn't really add up IMO. Reports that day were difficult to get, yet, one thing was sure. Building seven was going to fall?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CwjmqkjwnvQ
One person I believe is a firemen in the vid says [B]"the building is going to blow up"
. [/B]
Originally posted by Emperor AshtarThere are many pictures of Building 7's hole. You know, that 20 story hole? Strange how you don't mention it. It's the reason it was able to collapse.
Somehow on 911 despite many gargled reports, one thing was clear as day. WTC 7 was hit by debris from the initial attack and was going to collapse. Who made is the original author of this claim and how did they come to this conclusion. Because WTC 7 was nowhere near as damaged as the Deutsche Bank BuildingI've heard reports that state the Deutsche Bank Building ahd another building fall on it. Yet, I've heard no reports that it might collapse.
Originally posted by lord xyz
It was clear it was going to collapse to the people who were there. Whether it h ad or hadn't when the BBC got it is the confusion. Moron.
How was it clear the damage to the Solomon building is not as bad as the Bankers Trust building. Plus it was the farthest away, yet, is was suddenly clear to the fireman without a shadow of a that the building would collapse?
And, don't start with the insults, I know your a minor but, doesn't mean you have to act so immature. I'm not interested in having a flame war with a minor or on the online period.
Originally posted by lord xyz
There are many pictures of Building 7's hole. You know, that 20 story hole? Strange how you don't mention it. It's the reason it was able to collapse.
Funny, the bankers trust building has a hole as well and yet there were no reports indicating it might collapse.
And, please post this 20 story hole.