It has long been a problem of the Conspiracy Forum to have their discussions spread in every which way. Members have approached me with queries as to why we don't merge all the threads on one subject together.
For example, we have a September 11th, 2001 thread... in addition to dozens of other threads on the exact same topic, without any variation from the original thread, really.
So... should all threads be merged?
Unlike what some conspiracies may say, this vote isn't rigged.
i voted against...people who post here know what debates are going on in what thread because even though some are on the same general topic, often they are about specific areas within that topic
also...the need for merging only really becomes neccesary when the posting level is high...which isn't the case in this forum
__________________
http://celebrityscrapheap.blogspot.com/ blatent free advertising for a lady friend of mine's new blog...get it read
Well, if there's a thread on JFK that died on the 4th, and then another one is made on the 18th, wouldn't it be smart to merge the latter with the former?
Although, I do see your point. So maybe protect threads that are both going on and are currently on different aspects. However, there are many threads in the GDF that have more than one debate at once.
__________________
Last edited by lord xyz on Jan 1st 2000 at 00:00 AM
KMC Community Forums
Apr 2nd, 2008 01:45 AM
