both the proposer for the idea behind haarp and a team of physicist were worried about the very real possibility of haarp being used as as atmospheric/earthquake weapon.
the russian government was highly critical calling it a step up from missile defence and conventional weapons of the caliber as between steel swords and firearms.
your takes/oppinions.
{before you brush this 100 billion watt machine off, remember, that on record it can and has produced massive araural affects seen in the upper atmosphere in entire parts of the hemisphere artificially - just to allude to its capabilities. add to that, the fact that the funding comes entirely from the american military and navy and you have yourself a very credible conspiracy theory}
think you'll find ionospheric anomalies are a sign of seismic activity and not the other way round and the same phenomena has been seen in earthquakes before HAARP even existed...not to mention that there are 9 other stations around the planet that do the same thing HAARP does...including one in China
cant find a single scientific paper by Bernard Eastland anywhere and i've seen many news corporation runs programmes about conspiracy theories from 9-11 to the kennedy assassination to the moon landings...doesn't give them any creedence...just gets the news programmes ratings
the only published paper i could find with regards to haarp was
History and applications of HAARP technologies: the High FrequencyActive Auroral Research Program
and its abstract is as follows
still haven't answered my statement that the same atmospheric phenomena has been seen prior to earthquakes before HAARP was built
still haven't provided proof that HAARP was used prior to the earthquake
still haven't proved a link between HAARP and the earthquake
still haven't proven that even if there was a link, some evidence that it wasn't the chinese version of HAARP that done it
KMC Community Forums
Oct 15th, 2008 11:53 AM
anything that has to do with a conspiracy,that perfectly describes him. 
