Some NBA teams don't have leaders to help them be strong...

Started by ysh2271 pages

Some NBA teams don't have leaders to help them be strong...

Some NBA teams don't have leaders to help them be strong...

Being a leader on a team, you need to be able to post up to score, be a playmaker at critical moment, take tough shots, and make most free throws....

A few NBA teams lack of those qualified leaders I mentioned: Warriors, Sonics, Magic, and a few others....

If you want to be the savior to your team, you must be able to score the easiest way, and the most efficient way, to help your team's offense.

You have to be able to knock down some critical free throws too....

I miss the old time when most NBA teams have qualified leaders who were able to make games look interesting.

Re: Some NBA teams don't have leaders to help them be strong...

Originally posted by ysh227
Some NBA teams don't have leaders to help them be strong...

Being a leader on a team, you need to be able to post up to score, be a playmaker at critical moment, take tough shots, and make most free throws....

A few NBA teams lack of those qualified leaders I mentioned: Warriors, Sonics, Magic, and a few others....

You must be able to post up? So Nash isn't a leader? Grant Hill isn't a leader for the Magic? Duncan and Shaq aren't leaders because they aren't good at free throws? Hmmm, I feel there are definite holes in your theory.

yea and this thread could use another 199 pages of support.. hmm where could it find such a thing? The NBA thread perhaps.

and i agree with myth

Are you saying the NBA isn't interesting now? Basketball popularity has skyrocketed, so I'm not sure what you mean.

I think the thread is all about one player.

And that's Jordan.

Originally posted by Smasandian
I think the thread is all about one player.

And that's Jordan.

I liked Space Jam.