Batista or Cena, who has more strength.

Started by Gaevus Mesias1 pagesPoll

Batista or Cena, Who has more strength

Batista or Cena, who has more strength.

These guys are both pretty damn strong. Cena's FU on Big Show, Viscera and the double FU, pretty impressive. And Batista in 2005-early 2006 ruled Smackdown will an iron fist, just want to see who you guys think is stronger.

dave

Dave Bautista.

Just look at the guy's physique.

i'd go with cena for the examples above. i've never seen batista lift someone like big show over his shoulders. i've also seen him struggle batista bombing some of the slightly heavier opponents like kane.

seeing as they are both actors in some wrestling pantomime what does it matter, the script decides who is stronger.

the script is very loose, and the script depends on what the wreslters are capable of. i would say its a pretty important factor.

I say they're both pretty "meh" wrestlers. Both are pretty awful on the mic as well but God bless Cena for trying.

To answer your question though, in turns of feats, I'd have to say Cena. I could understand why someone would choose Batista though. His physique looks pretty impressive.

Mick Foley.

the end!

It would always be first Batista, then Cena. It's all so predictable.

Wake up for fooks sake, its all staged. Who wins is decided before the matches.

Like theater.

Batista is physically stronger than Cena. Why is there a debate?

IMO if Batista used the FU move to Big Show, he could also do it.
The Batista Bomb is a move which you can only perform on smaller, lighter opponents.
Lifting the opponent from the shoulders is a lot easier than spinning them around in a powerbomb position.

Originally posted by Bicnarok
Wake up for fooks sake, its all staged. Who wins is decided before the matches.

Like theater.

Pretty much every wrestling fan knows that. Doesn't mean it isn't entertaining to watch anyway. It's like any other TV show, really. So what if the winner is predecided? We as the audience don't know who's going to win until the end of the fight.

Also, Batista. But Cena is generally the more favoured one.

Originally posted by Neo_Version 7
I say they're both pretty "meh" wrestlers. Both are pretty awful on the mic as well but God bless Cena for trying.

To answer your question though, in turns of feats, I'd have to say Cena. I could understand why someone would choose Batista though. His physique looks pretty impressive.

Cena's ok in small doses. Batista is horrible @everything. Cena's had more impressive feats of strength so far.

Originally posted by Bicnarok
Wake up for fooks sake, its all staged. Who wins is decided before the matches.

Like theater.

i didnt say it wasnt. i just said that during a match theres a lot of 'ad lib' and that generally only the end is scripted as to how someone wins. of course its fake, the only people more idiotic than people who think wrestling is real are those that believe that most fans of wrestling think its real.

Bruce Lee would rock them all 😉

Cena's ok in small doses. Batista is horrible @everything. Cena's had more impressive feats of strength so far.

Dave beating Shawn Michaels was by far one of the worst moments in WWE 😠

and i think Cena's stronger. Dave's a body builder so they pay more attention to the muscle sculpting as opposed to strength building. but i could be wrong though.