Imagine that you're a great and powerful King (or Queen) and you have a vast and skillful military. You've enter many battles and your generals are notorious great warriors. Let's just cut to the chase....
...You can kick major ass!
Well, so happens that there are neighbor lands which remain neutral. It's open for anyone to claim. What would you choose?
Colonization or Conquer?
As usual I reserve my own opinion. But for this one.....I'd say Conquer! The rule of the mighty is greater than the rule of the equal.
__________________
"I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when my fear is gone I will turn and face fears path, and only I will remain."
-Paul Atreides
Colonize, and insight open rebellion in one of those new colonies. Proceed to crush all resistance and punish that colony for its disobedience. The others will fall in line.
__________________ A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals, and you know it.
Is this an era of war? Is someone trying to start wars simply for conquering land elsewhere?
__________________ "i love really really hard but i hold even harder grudges. and i just dont want to have to hurt your pretty little face... ever. haha. okay, but seriously... dont **** with me, okay?"
- Current Girlfriend
"Where ignorance is bliss, 'tis folly to be wise." - Thomas Gray
Take the Roman approach, give them the option of submitting, while allowing them to keep their religions, customs and local laws in place, as long as they accept my law(s) and ruler-ship above all else if/when the two conflict. If they refuse, conquer, then rebuild and do the above. Less likely to have revolts if you appease the people somewhat; outright tyranny never last for long.
There is more to war and expansion than a powerful army. In many cases the loss of life might be greater than the need for land, and could make you unpopular, or whatever. What are the politics involved?
And the two choices ultimately cause the same thing. Colonization of another country will cause war just the same. If you were bent on taking the land, you should use supreme military force.
__________________
Those fought and died these long passed years, the time soon come and shed our last tears..."
Well in that time period I'd suppose I would hope to negotiate it with the people living there giving them a choice. I'd explain the facts that a neighboring Kingdom could be cruel to them. If my strategists were foreseeing my Kingdom threatened, then, and if it wasn't agreed too, I'd be forced to conquerer it only because if another more evil/hostile kingdom got hold of it, they'd be too close for comfort and threaten my Kingdom. I do have to say that I would be a diplomatic and just Queen. I'd even name a holiday after me. Hmm, I suppose Friday would be great! TGIF.
Long Live Queen Debbiejo!
*And the people cheered*
Of course I'd send in my propagandists...lol
Last edited by debbiejo on Aug 15th, 2007 at 12:27 AM
Stir up mistrust and dislike of a more powerful neighbouring state, convince that war between the two is necessary. Offer salvation to the beleaguered lesser nation in exchange for military access and control over martial law. Conspire to shake up said nation's government ruling body, offer yourself up as a reluctant leader in a time of crisis. Declare every second Friday, Casual Dress Day.
__________________ A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals, and you know it.
Gender: Male Location: eating babies like it's 1904
colonize for better trade with that neighboring state and have the military secure trade.and seeing as my generals are neither dead nor dieing i would hide weapons caches and hidden barracks in this neutral state then slow trade by withdrawing my military force and surplussing resources and train men once there trade and economy are at there worst point and then............cheese it !!
Last edited by Atticus on Aug 15th, 2007 at 06:37 PM
I would incite rebellion and mistrust, as any good superpower would. Make allies with the government of the coup, and then secretly betray them, slowly eliminating their elite secretly, whilst the common folk beleive their allies are simply taking a tour of the country.
Saves money AND lives.
__________________
Those fought and died these long passed years, the time soon come and shed our last tears..."
Squash them like bugs show them who is in charge and execute all those that try to stop me. Make the rest so scared that they will surrender. Makes you go down in the history books as a far more known person then people who use politics
Hmm, well first I'll reinstitute public executions. That should be a good deterrent. Oh and the stockades. Everyone needs their sex life spiced up a bit....
The only successful way to invade and stay in a country is to conquer it and get rid of the original occupants otherwise your going to get an uprising eventually. Look at the USA, 60 million native Americans were killed, and those who weren´t became alcoholics or part of the new western society. And its worked so far
KMC Community Forums
Aug 13th, 2007 04:28 PM
A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals, and you know it.
Attachment: 
