Gender: Male Location: behind there, near here, next to yo
mind your P's and Q's
Is their a solid premise leading to a true conclusion, or are all conclusions, conditional to the premise?
P then Q, the conclusion is P. However, If P then Q, Q then follows P resulting in the conclusion of Q.
With P then Q, is there ever a premise leading to a final undoubted conclusion? I am only questiong something that Lewis Carroll already has. Are conditional premises's a flaw in philosophical logic?
__________________ "If you tell the truth, you never have to remember anything"
-TWAIN
Gender: Unspecified Location: In my own little world...
oh, wait, i sorta see what you're saying....
i'd have to say i think it's the latter, that all conclusions are conditional to the premise. it's sorta like Q and A, it all depends on the question you're asking, which will always effect the answer, or conclusion.
KMC Community Forums
Aug 24th, 2007 09:34 AM
