Blade wins.Gambit hasn't got sufficient physical skills to stay and fight with Blade.His charging powers wouldn't works on Blade, because Blade can slice in pieces cajun before he notice that he's got killed.
Blade has superhuman strenght, speed(so reflexes and reaction time), agility(probably Gambit agility is equal), stamina and resistance to injury.Gambit can throw him charged things that Blade could dodge without too much troubles and then get in melee range where he can show i own and beat down Gambit.Then he would have to escape from Xavier Institute before Logan reach him, or it would be a problem.
What is this, the fight of the overrated characters lol. Anyway, Blade wins, he's a much better fighter than the red-eyed unshaven mutant.
__________________ The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
umm gambit can blow things up, u all seem to forget that, all he needs to do is touch blades sword, or touch the building they are in, or throw some of his nifty cards at blade, blade has no real superpowers, he is just faster stronger and more durable, gambit would destroy blade
Ehm are you crazy or drunk?
Blade possess Class 1ton Strenght, superhuman senses and healing abilities, superhuman stamina and resistance to injuries, superhuman reflexes and reaction time.
Can Gambit charge a sword before Blade cut off his hands?Or his Gambit immortal so he can survive to a building collapsing on him and Blade?And his Blade so stupid to rest in the building that starts to collapse?NO.And has Blade real superpowers?Yes, so why you say that no sense thing?Even without weapons Blade can dodge Gambit charged cards, and reach him in melee range, and beating the living crap out of him, cause Gambit has human resistance to injury, and Blade with his no real superpower 1Ton Strenght can pass through Gambit's chest with a punch and the go back home with the staff of the X-Men member as a souvenir.
who?-kid you obviously don't know much of Blade if you talk about him like an overrated character.
I'm the first to admit I'm no Blade-expert, but I've seen him around in lots of comics, and I never liked him that much (a bit too cold for me, but hey, that's only my personal opinion).
__________________ The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
I don't contest your personal choices about heroes, they are personal and i respect them.But i know sufficient things about him to say that Gambit wouldn't give too much problems and even he wouldn't stand a chance.
Gambit isn't far too close in a match with Blade.He hasn't got the resistance to injury and most important, the stamina to withstand with the Daywalker.In a comic Blade slice a vampire in pieces but it was shown only one slice, and the guy was dead before he notice that he has got killed.And you think that someone that his that fast could get killed by Gambit?When the fights comes in close range Blade wins.When it's ranged combat, bullets are not explosive cards but Gambit hisn't bulletproof.
Uhm... K3vil... Gambit's cards are like grenades, and he has entire decks he can throw. Blade is fast, but dodging salvos of three grenade sized exploding cards is definitly not going to be easy. If he gets hit with one, he will go down. He may get back up, but he may not. In melee, how can you be sure Blade's sword will cut through Gambit's staff? Gambit has a fairly good chance of winning this.
Gambit will pose no threat to BLade. Blade is the better fighter, stronger, more durable, healing factor, faster so if you really think about it Blade will win. Plus he has vast fighting experience killing all of those Vampires. What has Gambit done?
__________________
The price of fame is high and the Thing cant pay the way.
KMC Community Forums
May 16th, 2004 12:11 AM
