Thats not actually what the scans showed. It didn't show that he was leagues faster. There are also scans which show Thor being able to handle people with FTL speed.
__________________ Watch what people are cynical about, and one can often discover what they lack.
- General George Patton Jr
Well what is it? He can either stop people who arfe moving at ftl speed, or he Can't hit an agile Wolverine. If either of those is true, than the Other MUST be PIS...
No he wasn't thats an exaggeration. First of all he was holding back, secondly he stated that his durability could resist Wolverines claws. Just because he stated that it wouldn't last forever doesnt mean the fight would be over in seconds.
__________________ Watch what people are cynical about, and one can often discover what they lack.
- General George Patton Jr
just about, thats what i got from the fight, it didnt look like wolverine was giving it his best either and Thor was still had trouble.
again, from the scan i saw wolverine get off -1- good rib slash and lo and behold, at the end of the fight Thor was bleeding from the rib. 1 slash, 1 bleeding wound, and that was through armro, (if thor wears any there, could just be clothing). From that fight, anyone would deduce that one clean eye slash would result in temp blindness for the duration of the fight.
He got slashed...and was bleeding..durability be damned. :/
Wolverine thought he was Creed which means he was trying to kill him. Thor blocked a suprise attack from Wolverine, managed to grab his leg and connected with a hammer blow. That doesn't mean he can't hit Wolverine that means he would have some problems but Wolverine would still get hit.
He might not even decide to do that how many times has he fought bricks and not done that. I could argue that Thor could win via BFR, or that he could have hit harder. Thor was clearly holding back. You notice how one hammer blow had Wolverine on the floor and he didn't get up to dodge the lightning?
Um Thor said it wasn't significant damage.
__________________ Watch what people are cynical about, and one can often discover what they lack.
- General George Patton Jr
obviously it wasnt deep, thats not what i said. How deep does a wound to the eye s have to be to make them usless? Not very..id bet the same type of slash Thor recieved to the side, would have blinded him if it was across the eyes..and then what?
asssuming there's no bfr, wolverine could take majority in both scenarios.
thor would find it hard to put wolverine down, whereas Wolverine could inflict significant damage on thor with slash to the eyes or other sensitive regions
Foolish warrior Pride.
Thor fights like an Warrior, brawling with pride. Wolverin is an martial arts expert. Weapon X was made to take out the Hulk. And he does pretty well in most of their encounters, at least he holds his ground for a while.
Against Red Hulk he did pretty well and even WWH needed some time to beat Logan.
With only his strength, his durability and his fighting skills I wouldn't give Thor the majority.
Strength is in Thors favours but he will need more hits then WWH before logan will go down.
Durability goes also to Thor. His skin and his armor might soften the dmg but not forever and even then not as good as WWH skin.
Speed, i think that Wolverine has the edge in here, sneaky bastard. Thor might fight opponents or tag them even on ftl speed, a lot of people do but still they get owned by enemies who aren't that fast. Except for the Flash, where it is PIS, it's just for the sake of the story.
Fighting Skills, Wolverine hands down. Yeah Thor is a great fighter with thousands years of battle experience but still just a warrior. Wolverine uses another kind of fighting technique, an more advanced one, it's superior to that of Thor. Or doesn anybody really think that an Viking Warrior from the past is an better h2h fighter then the best martial artist?
If Wolverine goes for the eyes and succeeds he will win, like against RULK .
1. Wolverine 6/10 (because Mjolnir can be used to block the attacks)
2 Wolverine 8/10
KMC Community Forums
Nov 3rd, 2009 10:49 AM
.
