With all of these "without weakness" threads going around, I decided to make my own.
Thor fans will always argue that thor wins over supes coz of superman's weakness to magic, while superman fans argue for supe's coz of his superior speed.
So for this fight we'll take away supe's weakness to both magic and kryptonite, and we'll give thor superspeed to match supes.
Most likely, imo? Tie: 5/10 for both. Each has their share of insane feats that clearly makes them peers and without any obvious weaknesses to change the odds, I don't see how you can say one would win a dramatic majority over the other.
__________________
Carl - "No, the real point is: I don't give a damn."
Carl - "This line, here? Line of Death. You cross it, and your freedoms no longer exist. Um-kay? Have a good day."
__________________ Quotes from Hia8:
"I claimed that the science is sometimes faulty."
"You don't understand. This is fiction. That means none of this stuff really happened."
"There is no writer to purposely ignore a character's natural ability just because it suits the story."
"in some cases because the writer knows that Character A will dominate Character B easily and refuses to allow this to happen for the sake of the story."
IMO, Superman's "magic" vulnerability isn't really a weakness to be exploited anyway. He's just not as resilent to magical forces as say Thor or Wonder Woman would be.
I think both Superman and Thor have specific advantages over the other, but not so much where one character could get a decisive majority over the other. Anything beyond a 6/10 in either direction is not likely to happen.
Agreed. He's not more susceptible to magic than any other non-magic powered being, he's just vulnerable. So the term "weakness" is a bit of a misnomer.
As for the thread, it really doesn't bring anything new to the match up. Closed.
KMC Community Forums
Jan 3rd, 2010 08:29 PM
