Snake Eyes and Solid Snake.. cause they're Snake Eyes and Solid Snake...
NOW THAT'S AN ARGUMENT!
__________________ "damn jinzin, you're a real trooper, you provde fact after fact and pages and pages of proof and these wanton miscreants just keep at it"~MERC
__________________ "I ain't no fraggin' hero. I'm th' main man. I booze.
I womanize. I swear. An' I beat th' living crap outta
anybody I fraggin' feel like."- Lobo
Sorry to keep embarrassing you but you're asking for it.
Fox never punched Snake in the face so no way to take his head off. There are more than enough examples in the game to tell Snake is no mere human with insane damage soak and durability. Him not getting killed by Fox's attack is a retarded argument. Same way Cap doesnt get killed by an attack from Iron Man. There would have to BE an established strength level for you to argue that some particular showing is PIS. But there isnt. So you can only speculate and nobody really cares about your specuations. And im sure as hell not going to disregard the feat if even writers of the game believe he should be that strong just because some kid on a forum disagrees with them.
How does it not fit into continuity? Because Vamp managed to catch Snake off-guard? Seriously? That's your reason? Twin Snakes follow the events of the original MGS version, it feats into continuity perfectly. Its not about the year it came out. They basically retold the exact same story but this time without having to restrict themselvs with PSX's oldfashioned graphycs. Its canon.
CQC is close quarters combat. In twin snakes Snake fights using his fists, kicks and occasionally knees. That doesnt controdict the plot. So fail again. Heck Metal Gear Solid for PSX was not the first game in the series, MG was created long before that and its story is also canon to the series, Snake fighting Big Boss etc was written in 1980s. But if they were to release the exact same 1987 story but for the modern consoles which one would you count as canon? The new game or the 1987 one? Same with Twin Snakes. Same game, same continuity. But better graphycs and special effects.
They did. It wasnt just camera. There was a sound effect of MG shaking and dust from it shaken. They shook the tank. So third fail in one post.
I can post a scan of Deadpool struggling with an ordinary rope and I can post a scan of him ripping metal shackles apart. That's just how it works. Again, we dont know what the cuffs were made of. And its not his only strength showing. Deciding the outcome of the entire battle based on one cuffs instance is plain dumb, especially when he has actual combat feats that matter more here and are pretty damn impressive.
Newsflash, real life =/= video games. In Metal Gear CQC is a whole different story. If you've played Snake Eater you should remember the crazy stuff Boss did with it. Volgin (the guy who can punch through a tank) was scared sh!tless of her because of her training.
I dont see how he's not physically capable when he does things they're yet to accomplish. As for skills.. he's as good as they get in terms of skills. Iron Fist said that Matt fights using kickboxing most of the time anyway.
As for the fights, they do look realistic. That's just how fights go in videos. For the sake of making it more interesting it has to look somewhat realistic. Comicbook characters would've been moving this way as well, look at any tv series or CGI movies. That doesnt change the fact that Snake and Fox were shown dodging bullets and at pointblank range. Not every comicbook character can do that.
And lastly, congratulations on your chicken attempt to "win" the debate by making the last post in a closed thread and sending an insulting PM after restricting access to your prophile. If you're willing to chicken out so fast dont start the debate. Sorry had to embarrass you even further.
__________________
Azula: My mommy didn't love me so I'm going to burn down your village.
Last edited by SamZED on Aug 4th, 2011 at 05:27 PM