The following battles can only be won by completely killing the other side or by KO and no BFR allowed; battles take place in an abandoned New York City...
How far does Depowered Tyrant get?
1) Void...
2) Peak Power Onslaught...
3) Thanos+Thor in full Warriors Madness equipped with Asgardian Battle Armor and Belt of Strength...
4) Uatu...
5) Uatu+Thanos...
6) Odin...
7) Odin+Thor in full Warriors Madness equipped with Asgardian Battle Armor and Belt of Strength...
8) Odin+Thanos...
9) Odin+Thanos+Thor in full Warriors Madness equipped with Asgardian Battle Armor and Belt of Strength...
10) Peak Power Demogorge...
The thing with Tyrant (DP or otherwise) is, there is a some debate over how well he'd fare against people whose power he can't absorb/metabolize.
For example, I can't see Odin doing what DP Tyrant did to a FULLY FED and PREPPED Galactus. DP Tyrant had him dead to rights till Morg showed up with the UN.
However, some people have argued that Galactus was the ideal opponent for DP Tyrant since DP Tyrant absorbs bio-synth energy and is a top class technopath.
Odin, to my knowledge, utilizes high end magic and his innate divinity as the sources of his power. Something DP Tyrant hasn't been shown to have any control over.
__________________
..even the outer hells are indifferent matters for they bow only to potent and archaic Nodens.
Actually that isn't a Thumbs Up. Tyrant beats Odin and it really is as simple as that. You need to look no further than how they fared against a common opponent to see who has more power. The answer is clearly Tyrant.
I dont think so; neither was giving it their all against Thanos...I am certain that Odin wasnt atleast as he has feats of power far beyond what he demostrated against Thanos.
But if you want to use the common foe argument, Odin one-shotted Surfer while Tyrant failed to do so...
He made good points his post was sound and all you can say is nuh uh most people in this thread dont even think he can make it to Odin anyways. zopzop already stated why Tyrant did so well aganist Galactus theor common opponent yet your using Galactus as the deal breaker good grief
I'm not talking about Galactus at all Ice.. I'm talking about Thanos as the common foe. LOM picked up on that. Odin never "fought" Galactus... he was only ONE SHOT WITH EASE when Doom had Galactus's power lol. Again you come back with this... he did so well.. because of this... yet as has been said and proven over and over.. that ISN'T an advantage of Tyrant over Galactus. GALACTUS ALSO HAS THAT SAME ABILITY. Thus, that can't be the deciding factor on why Tyrant did well, when Galactus does the exact same thing. A simple logical fact like that seems to continually go over your head and I'm not sure why.
Surfer was one shot TWICE... The only difference was he stayed down longer when Odin did it. However, both times against Tyrant..Surfer was put down for a period of time constituting a win against Tyrant. If you wanna use the "not trying" as hard argument LOM... Surfer SPECIFICALLY says.. he's going to use his full force on Tyrant and he would pay.. he NEVER expressed such feeling towards Odin. Thus, it could be argued based on on panel narration Surfer was trying against Tyrant and holding back against Odin.... See how that works LOM?
It didnt go over my head the fact that you continually ignore what happen ON PANEL is mind boggling. Tyrant absorbed Galactus' energy blast and was empowered Galactus didnt do the same so the fact that they both could absorb BE is moot in regards to their encounter it really is that simple that fact seems to soar over your head eveytime unless you can show me on panel scans of Galactus being amped by Tyrant during their fight? Again Galactus is the ideal opponent for Tyrant due to synthetic BE and tech Odin on the otherhand would carve Tyrant up like a giant turkey with dreads