Didn't Odin still end up losing to the Celestials? They just lol'ed the sword off and regenerated.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
I could of sworn individual Celestials were not on the level of Galactus. Best Celestial feats? I don't care about statements.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Wow, So the Destroyer powered by all of Asgard can't beat FP Tyrant.
Isn't the 2000ft Destroyer's visor disintegration blast more powerful than its hand blasts?
Isn't the 2000ft Destroyer's hand blasts significantly more powerful than a normal sized Destroyer hand blast?
Didn't a weaker normal version of the Destroyer slice through Mjolnir with the weaker hand blasts?
Isn't Mjolnir more durable than Galactus by direct comparison?
I'm thinking you are overrating Tyrant. Isn't Odin inside a normal size Destroyer a match for Galactus as shown in the comic (Galactus chose wisely not to fight and flee)?
And
Didn't the Destroyer manage to chop off a Celestials arm with ease?
Yes, also if it is 2000ft tall then that means it is more than 280times taller. Thus it is more than 280 times thicker and hence more than 280 times more durable. So if Galactus would have a hard time damaging a normal size Destroyer powered by Odin then he would have a more than 280 times harder time with a 2000ft Destroyer.
If object increase in size then everything else increase with the same proportion. That means thickness increases too. This rule is broken for 2D objects though (cartoons).
As far as being more powerful. I assume that it is because it would be silly to imbue Destroyer with all the power of Asgard if it's not going to make the Destroyer more powerful.