So yeah, Hulk's feat utterly eclipses Thanos'... The difference in scale is gargantuan(I'm talking several orders of magnitude here.) We'll see what the final issue brings next month, but as of right *now*, WBH stomps the living shit out of Thanos h2h. Not even debatable.
*cue the inevitable quanchi-troll-post*
"This bold vision of the future requires a vast military dedicated to upholding the enactment of universal laws which are necessary to ensure galactic harmony.
In truth, these actions are taken merely to protect us from those who would invade, enslave, or foment political dissent, and to punish accordingly any who engage in such acts.
Look on our new military not as trespassers or interlopers, but as gatekeepers, here to shore up the Emperor's vision of a pacified and prosperous galaxy."
Last edited by Galan007 on Sep 29th, 2017 at 03:47 AM
Arguing by feats alone is the lowest form of debating tbh. You're ignoring the peer to peer comparisons and critical thinking. It's why feats aren't necessarily needed to determine heirarchy. If you still want to decide these matches by feats alone by all means do so. Just because Celestials show up and don't destroy a galaxy that doesn't mean they can't stomp Odin. Common sense is not as common as I'd like it to be.
That wasn't my point. My point was that the version of the Hulk that was confronted by Annihilhulk wasn't butt raped like Gladiator was. If Anni had run up against WB Hulk he would have likely been smoked. Savage Hulk in comparison to WB Hulk is nearly like comparing Bi-Beast, or Wendigo to WB Hulk.
It's still a bit early for me to make any strong claims, but I definitely can see where Galan is coming from in his recent post on the subject.
I'm also not sure if the power that Thanos currently has is his original power level? I don't even know if he's going to keep this power?