Alright we have the dark form of Sora (Anti-Form Sora) vs. the dark form of Link (Link's Shadow). Who would win? Oh and for the record this is a straight up melee fight.
Anti-sora is much to fast and he actually chains all his attacks,Link is much to slow.Anti-form teleports as he attacks link would have a hard time getting a win .A light arrow would probably down Sora though so I say a draw.
How do you know if he has any light arrows you don't because when you fight him you can't possibly have the light arrows.Shadow link uses all the weapons you have available at the time...........So it's possible for him to use the light arrow if you have them in your inventory......
Except you only fight him one, and that once he doeas not have the ligth arrows. So its safe to assume he doesnt have the light arrows. Not only that, but light always defeats dark, so why would a dark link use light arrows. He'd be weakening himself.
he has no items he is supossed to mimic link but he can't if you use din's fire ore potions or things like that so no he wouldn't and anti sora is like a wild animal...sorta he praticaly tears opponents apart bear handed
i vote anti-sora
I say Anti-Sora! AntiForm is triggered by an unseen counter and chance that increases as the player uses certain drives more often and the chances increase or decrease in certain situations. Anti Form renders Sora completely black with glowing yellow eyes, similar to those of a Heartless. He is seemingly feral; he runs on all fours and attacks with his claws. While in Anti Form, Sora is unable to use the Keyblade, magic or items. However, Sora's combo potential is drastically increased. Whenever the Anti Form is invoked it always drops the normal drive gauge down to zero and the amount of time you have in the Anti Form depends on the drive gauge level of the form that Sora was trying to transform into. Unlike the regular Drive forms the Anti form possesses no special abilities that can be equipped to Sora. That's my reason how would Link win?
KMC Community Forums
Apr 19th, 2006 02:01 PM
Attachment: 
