Since when can NJO characters "own" the Ancient Sith of which we have no evidence on?
Since when can NJO characters "own" any previous era's with the exception of NJO Luke who could pwn close to anyone in any era.
I'll like to you logically state how someone with no information on them can be "owned" by someone with considerably more sources on them. Sure you can produce wonderful feats, amazing skills and etc. But none of even if placed into context will definitively show that it will beat a character with nothing more than speculation.
For exactly that reason: They have no information on them.
You can't say that they might have been able to do something. We've seen them do things, and that's what we're capable of going by.
Man A (In one book): Throws a rock.
Man B (In six books and a movie): Throws a boulder, shatters a mountain with a single hit, and slings cars around like toys.
The argument "Well we can't be sure that Man B will win because we've never seen Man A do anything better" is ridiculous. Just because it's possible that he could do better doesn't mean it should be accepted that he could. We've seen them in action, they've proved to be less powerful (From what we've seen). A criminal doesn't get off just because you can't prove beyond any doubt whatsoever that he's guilty. A criminal only gets released when you can't prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he/she was responsible (Obviously there are kinks in the system, but that's the intent behind it). Saying that it can't be decided because we haven't seen them do anything impressive isn't a "logical" argument in the least. The simple fact of the matter is they have been shown as more powerful, no matter how many or few sources on them exist.
Sep 29th, 2006 12:29 AM
