A battle of the top three Sith(Me and many others arrived at this conclusion after many hours of debating many Sith, either way its just an opinion, yours could be different.)
Vs.
Luke, Yoda, and Mace at their known Prime.
overall..i think even these Three powerful sith couldnt take on three of the top Jedi ever seen.
I doubt the battle would be "Lets just take on one person!", knowing Sidious, Revan and Caedus. They may kill off one person to make their opponent's team weaker.
Them same thing could be said for the other team. The jedi have a distinct advantage here. Luke is the most powerful here. Yoda is more powerful than Revan. Mace's shatterpoint and vapaad are going to be extremely affective here. Sith lose but it wont be easy.
Then it is indeed a very good one, but the Jedi win. They have the most powerful being to ever exist in the SW. Not even with DE Sidious on their side will the Sith be able to win.
__________________ Thanks to ScarletSpeed for the sig!
A warrior knows nothing of surrender.
Except the "let's just take one person" route is more likely. This is a three-on-three match. To say that the Sith team would gang up on one person is to say that the other two members of the Jedi team would sit there and allow it to happen. How exactly are they going to "kill off one person" when the other two are there to back that person up?
Now, if this was a three vs. two match, four vs. two/three match, or something else of the sort, then that point would be understandable. If one team has more than another team, then they can gang up on the other team. However, when both teams have three people, sending two Sith against one Jedi will leave one Sith against two Jedi, and sending three Sith against one Jedi will just prompt the other two Jedi to help that individual Jedi, bringing it back to three vs. three.
I will have to offer a slight disagreement. Though one can conclude that the Jedi team, all in all, have a power advantage, it would be a mistake to argue that they are as tactically and strategically capable as their dark side opponents. Luke Skywalker is arguably the most powerful combatant we've ever seen within the Star Wars mythos and yet we have seen circumstances and situations deal him decisive defeats and near-losses. The simple fact is that his mentality doesn't afford him any real strategic capability; all three Sith Lords outclass him in that department. Caedus was on the losing end of his duel with Luke, but he did indeed fight smarter. Likewise, Revan is one of the most capable tactitions ever, and Palpatine's intellectual and fighting mentality speaks for itself.
Strategically speaking, the Sith are leagues more capable than their opponents. What's to stop Sidious from butchering Mace and Yoda with the Force (or at least holding them off) while Revan and Caedus do the same thing with Luke?
It's not as cut and dry as people make it out to be. The Sith Lords' gift for smart and cunning fighting evens the power disparity. However, I am also siding with the Jedi on this one. But they'll be losing one or two people in the process. Mace's Vaapad and shatterpoint charism, Yoda's speed and peerless experience, and Luke's... well... Skywalker power levels will tip the scales.
Nov 13th, 2007 11:01 PM
