__________________ "Happiness is a lie. Life is horror. The light is always dying all across the universe. The last star will flicker out someday, when it does, all that remains is shadow. And I will be its king!"'-Amahl Farouk
Luke for 'Sabers, and all-out. I'm pretty torn on the Force, though. Luke has more raw power and intrinsic aptitude - but Katarn has a wider range of Force abilities to draw upon such Force Lightning, and Darkshear.
__________________ "Happiness is a lie. Life is horror. The light is always dying all across the universe. The last star will flicker out someday, when it does, all that remains is shadow. And I will be its king!"'-Amahl Farouk
LAL@ Luke being more powerful than Galen and Starkiller. Luke could barely hold up an AT-ST; Starkiller was busting frigates and Galen was redirecting the descent of a falling Imperial Star Destroyer.
Proof TFU was never, ever canon pls. 'Cause by simply opening up a Star Wars novel, and viewing the timeline you can see it's listed in the continuity.
Hmm, so using your logic, Ahsoka isn't canon either? 'Cause I don't recall Anakin having an apprentice/padawan, or Tano being in the movies, or even mentioned there either.
Of course, this is just one of the flaws in your logic.
Except in TFU, Marek is literally the inspiration for the Rebel Alliance :/.
No, scratch that, he is the founder, and the inspiration for the Rebel Alliance, that contradicts the movies because he is never mentioned.
What about the Starkiller clone? Should he be canon too? Because, y'know, Vader getting captured and such, bunch of Starkiller clones. Luke near the middle of TFU should already have been off on his adventure with Ben Kenobi and such.
OH, what about him? Why isn't Ben Kenobi mentioned? Or Yoda? Why only Rahm Kota?
Also, Vader himself says that Luke as of ESB was the greatest opponent he'd ever faced.
Oct 28th, 2015 04:54 AM
Thanks Scribble!
...No wait, neither of those things do that at all.
