Tranformers BIG Succes!!!!!! BUT what did you think???
I thouhgt it was most awesome movie !!!!!! But thats just me whatd yall think!...>>> i was however expecting Optimus Prime to kick butt at the end NOT to get his kicked ! Dissapointing!! But altogethere an AWESOME MOVIE!!!! Reply PLZ
Re: Re: Tranformers BIG Succes!!!!!! BUT what did you think???
I thought they did a fantastic job of it, all of the autobots and the decepticons were great, are you kidding me, did you actually expect them to us a VW bug for bumble bee? that would of totaly sucked.
and i suppose you wanted Megatron to be a gun that is completely useless.
Re: Re: Re: Tranformers BIG Succes!!!!!! BUT what did you think???
Umm yes I wanted MEGATRON as a gun because thats what HE IS !!!!
Yes I wanted BUMBLEBEE to be a VW why ? because thats what he IS !!
My point is that if you call the movie transformers using the names of the originals, then make them as they are supposed to be.
They should have called the movie something else other than TRANSFORMERS.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Tranformers BIG Succes!!!!!! BUT what did you think???
It would of been so goofy having that, it was fine in the 80's, but this is the 21st century and they had to upgrade, i guess if the actually brought soundwave in you would want him as a ruddy tape deck?
It's like the new transformers cartoon, boy does that suck.
The animation is terrible, and it is very very childish
make it a bit more mature like G1, or even more mature than that.
I know what you are going to say, that it is geared for kids, well I say crapola to that, my 3 year old niece watches the batman, justice league, and loves them.
They should of gone along those lines so a parent can watch it with their kid and get enjoyment out of it too.
It's like the new spiderman cartoon, boy does that suck, it's like a 2 year old drew it. the one before that was much better. the new transformers cartoon and spiderman cartoon look like the power puff girls.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Tranformers BIG Succes!!!!!! BUT what did you think???
80's vs 21st century huh?
They did not have to change a thing. The NEW story line is WRONG, the love story is nonexistent and not needed and you still havent explained this "all spark".
Also let me mention that cybertron... LOL... is definetly not a ball of dirt looking like a poor mans version of mad max.
Soundwave sounded cool back then and he would sound cool now.
Nothing for nothing I would have used the mighty Galvatron in lieu of Megatron as he turned in to a MEGA CANNON rather than a hand gun.
And please explain Megatron whipping Prime in a fight.
The movie should have been called Transformers omega or something with a host of new Robots taking place AFTER my beloved generation 1.
Last edited by SMIFF-N-WESSON on Mar 18th, 2008 at 08:04 PM
Don't get me started on that piss poor animated new transformers cartoon. That disgrace of transformers (like the others) is a WB kids gay -a- thon.
Who would have thought that someone would even attempt to mix teen titans with powerpuff girls to re-create a great cartoon.
I really feel sorry for you young-uns because this is the only transformers that you will know of.
I had the same problem with Dan Reed's art in the Marvel run.
Bendy-organic-superdeformedness that fits in the world of the mechanical like blamonge resembles a ICBM missile.
The seem to have been a Clone Wars type animation, but this ain't Clone wars.
And given the superior animated styles of the eighties movie if not the series in the eighties, It does seem to silly to downgrade.
Don't get me wrong, get it tooooooooo mechanical and you can end up like the Bay movie or Energon/Cybertron, but somewhere between that and like the Alternator range's look in anime form or perhaps the like Dreamwave comics would've had 'em looking great.
Just a question of subjectivity, I guess.
"Van Zan is the Pinocchio of feces." - Lestov16
Last edited by Sadako of Girth on Mar 31st, 2008 at 08:56 AM